Here is the link to Swedish Gamereactors review. I wrote it and I'm a huge Dead or Alive fan. At least normally. This one got a rock solid 6 from me though. We've grabbed the screens ourselves b t w, the character models are gorgeous but the backgrounds is way to simple. Also, no anti alias at all. Really bad picture quality.
http://www.gamereactor.se/recensioner/70551/Dead+or+Alive+5/
Here is the link to Swedish Gamereactors review. I wrote it and I'm a huge Dead or Alive fan. At least normally. This one got a rock solid 6 from me though. We've grabbed the screens ourselves b t w, the character models are gorgeous but the backgrounds is way to simple. Also, no anti alias at all. Really bad picture quality.
http://www.gamereactor.se/recensioner/70551/Dead+or+Alive+5/
Is my english really that bad? I was just trying to explain the quality of the pictures.If it had more AA would it have gotten more points?
Is my english really that bad? I was just trying to explain the quality of the pictures.
$5 for 4 sounds about right for DLC costumes, but I think they'll be single character packs with a few out every few weeks. So like Christie pack/Tina pack/Lisa pack one month, Kasumi pack/Ayane pack/Kokoro pack the next month, etc etc.
EDIT: Bundles would be cool too. So like "Get all three packs for $12!" That'd be great.
I can't imagine them dropping multiple costumes for a character at once. I dunno, I guess we'll have to wait and see.
EDIT: Also, whilst I understand why you'd want to pimp your review for a game on a popular forum (Particularly one which is potentially controversial), most people here won't know Swedish. Just sayin'.
I wonder why only Lisa / Tina / Christie got unlockable swimsuits. Big breasted characters only?
Here is the link to Swedish Gamereactors review. I wrote it and I'm a huge Dead or Alive fan. At least normally. This one got a rock solid 6 from me though. We've grabbed the screens ourselves b t w, the character models are gorgeous but the backgrounds is way to simple. Also, no anti alias at all. Really bad picture quality.
http://www.gamereactor.se/recensioner/70551/Dead+or+Alive+5/
Its not as fast /smooth as DOA4 I think its probably for the better.
It's not as smooth as DOA4?
It's more smooth and just as fast. They added more frames in the animations. Hence why some people feel it's slower.
It's not as smooth as DOA4?
So have said most of the people I have seen with the game.It's more smooth and just as fast. They added more frames in the animations. Hence why some people feel it's slower.
Here is the link to Swedish Gamereactors review. I wrote it and I'm a huge Dead or Alive fan. At least normally. This one got a rock solid 6 from me though. We've grabbed the screens ourselves b t w, the character models are gorgeous but the backgrounds is way to simple. Also, no anti alias at all. Really bad picture quality.
http://www.gamereactor.se/recensioner/70551/Dead+or+Alive+5/
Yeah, my thoughts exactly. If the game will get bashed by reviews like this one (well, at least as this one sounds if read through Google Translate ) I'm gonna be so sad and disappointed. I don't want to believe we still live in a gaming-world where there is room for just one big fighting game at time, and in order to push the other one down - I wouldn't call a 6/10 'rock solid'... That feels pretty lame. An 8, a 9: that's what I mean by 'rock solid' - we have to be picky about backgrounds (btw... They look gorgeous to me! ^^).I see things are not detailed on the review and not explaining the changes of the game between 4-5. Gameplay is similar but then again its part of the territory of fighting games. Change the whole fighting system and you'll be alienating your fanbase and shooting yourself in the foot. Its not as fast /smooth as DOA4 I think its probably for the better. I didnt see explanations or clear explanations of the new mechanics at it (critical burst, power blow, Sidestep)
The major complainment seems to be aimed torwards the simplistic backgrounds and lack of AA and I think that shouldnt be the major factor into the game if said game plays well and its fun.
Obviously I'm reading it from Google Translate so I might not be completely understanding everything at it since some things are obviously lost in translation but most of the complainments at least on the pros and cons area are torwards visual aspects and not gameplay related.
six hours, get hype
Wait a bit more for confirmations.so this game has no AA?
so this game has no AA?
But that was the Alpha demo which was a way too early version of the game. I think someone confirmed the final version was 720 but I dont remember anything about AA mentioned.The alpha demo didn't. I think it's also sub-hd, but can't be sure.
Are reviews embargoed until tomorrow or something? Metacritic is empty.
Are reviews embargoed until tomorrow or something? Metacritic is empty.
Tomorrow, 6AM, but I'm not sure if it's PDT or EDT.
The alpha demo didn't. I think it's also sub-hd, but can't be sure.
"It's more smooth and just as fast. They added more frames in the animations. Hence why some people feel it's slower."
They added more frames in the animations? Is there a comparison somewhere? Not sure I understand what you mean.
Damn that sucks if true. Itagaki would not have let this happen.
Did you review it on PS3 or XBOX?
"It's more smooth and just as fast. They added more frames in the animations. Hence why some people feel it's slower."
They added more frames in the animations? Is there a comparison somewhere? Not sure I understand what you mean.
Damn that sucks if true. Itagaki would not have let this happen.
"Lets see if watching that kinda works."
I don't think there are "more frames in the animations" though, unless they made the animations longer which would definitely make the game slower, not just as fast.
Wasn't 6 am for streams?
Damn that sucks if true. Itagaki would not have let this happen.
It's the best looking game Team Ninja has ever made.. the graphics are fine.
This. They're more than fine.
For me, it's the best looking fighter this generation. Although SC4/5's IQ brings it to a close second.
Eurogamer Spain - 7/10
The same reviewer gave TTT2 8/10
I don't know if I'm gonna be flamed for this, but I might say Mortal Kombat is one of the best looking fighters this generation. I always thought it was really slick the way the story stuff went seamlessly into the fight during story mode. Plus I really think it's cool the way the losing fighter just gets up in between rounds, and it doesn't cut away.
Making it short and in english
+Its a good fighting game that is accessible and can be addictive
+Visuals are outstanding.
+Story mode that works as a tutorial and its kinda like MK9.
-Game plays the same
-Brings nothing new to the table.
-Lacks game modes.