Psykodad
Banned
Your interpretation then, because I honestly couldn't care less.you sounded hurt by his action
I even talked about the possibility of me disliking the game too once I get to play it.
Your interpretation then, because I honestly couldn't care less.you sounded hurt by his action
What are you talking about? Why is he suddenly doing a review? The print in the magazine and the tweet came out around the same time. It's got nothing to do with backlash and until the next issue is published, and if he can bring himself to finish the game, then we will know if it is reviewed.Yes, and suddenly he is going to do a review after all the backlash.
Therefor, he discredited hinself. It' s pretty simple really.
All he had to do on twitter was say he might not do a review without ranting like a spoiled child and all would be fine.
Complaining about needing to finish the game before reviewing is the key issue, not the print deadline.What are you talking about? Why is he suddenly doing a review? The print in the magazine and the tweet came out around the same time. It's got nothing to do with backlash and until the next issue is published, and if he can bring himself to finish the game, then we will know if it is reviewed.
No worries, I cry when I give myself handjobs.
Something you like doing?
I dont like doing things I dont like, but thats just me I guess.
Please share impressions.Lucky me, I got the game today. So I am starting my gaming session in few hours.
"Basically if you can't enjoy the gameplay loop...... ."
i dont think he is referring to:Who are you referring to? The vast majority of positive 80+/100 reviews?
Cool, honestly can't be bothered to start a sum of all things discussion with you too.i dont think he is referring to:
"The vast majority of positive 80+/100 reviews SCORES"
I think he is referring to the vast majority of negative rewievs texts... with positive 80+/100 rewievs Scores
So for anyone who want to go as blind as possible, apparently Giant Bomb review reveals or heavily implies the origin of the baby thing.
Can anyone who read it confirm if this is true? i only watched very few no spoiler reviews.
Perhaps the reviewer thought it unfair to review a game as he did not want to finish it, thus sticking to the rules of the embargo.
Yes it spoilers. I tried to read the reviews because I often hear giant bomb is for cool kids and I was interested what bothered him so much.So for anyone who want to go as blind as possible, apparently Giant Bomb review reveals or heavily implies the origin of the baby thing.
Can anyone who read it confirm if this is true? i only watched very few no spoiler reviews.
Those are the people who refused to cover Kingdom Come (for obvious reasons), in spite of requests from their fans.Yes it spoilers. I tried to read the reviews because I often hear giant bomb is for cool kids and I was interested what bothered him so much.
I made it in 3 paragraphs and he did not stop spoiling hard so I stopped reading.
It also didn't help that his style of writing feels to target fans of the game in an aggressive and condescending way. Like he tries to provoke you how shit the game is and how dumb you have to be to like it. He doesn't said it but it was not a good read. Don't know a better way to say it.
Also the fact that he has no regard for spoilers shows he has no respect for the game and his readers...
Then the meta will drop into the 70s. Some people here are going to throw a party!After the backslash he changed to review the game in next issue.
So be it, the guy is clown regardless.Then the meta will drop into the 70s. Some people here are going to throw a party!
The score is the less important thing in his case... the unprofessionalism is in his face.Then the meta will drop into the 70s. Some people here are going to throw a party!
What's unprofessional about the stance that he has played the game for a long time, concluded it is a dreadful experience, but because he is contractually bound not to write review unless he reached the end of the game, to write a critique without a score instead? He said he played the game for fourty hours. If you play a game for fourty hours and feel it is trash all that time, why would you continue playing? How could the game even possibly salvage your opinion of the game afterwards?The score is the less important thing in his case... the unprofessionalism is in his face.
What's unprofessional about the stance that he has played the game for a long time, concluded it is a dreadful experience, but because he is contractually bound not to write review unless he reached the end of the game, to write a critique without a score instead? He said he played the game for fourty hours. If you play a game for fourty hours and feel it is trash all that time, why would you continue playing? How could the game even possibly salvage your opinion of the game afterwards?
I thought he was paid to do the job lolWhat's unprofessional about the stance that he has played the game for a long time, concluded it is a dreadful experience, but because he is contractually bound not to write review unless he reached the end of the game, to write a critique without a score instead? He said he played the game for fourty hours. If you play a game for fourty hours and feel it is trash all that time, why would you continue playing? How could the game even possibly salvage your opinion of the game afterwards?
Oh sorry we thought it was his job.
His job is not to slavishly play to completion every game he reviews. 40 hours are plenty. His job is (in terms of reviews) to give an informed opinion about a game and to explain its strengths and weaknesses in a fair way. If he played a game for 40 hours, he will almost certainly be able to do so.I thought he was paid to do the job lol
If you are alright with unprofessionalism... fine.His job is not to slavishly play to completion every game he reviews. 40 hours are plenty. His job is (in terms of reviews) to give an informed opinion about a game and to explain its strengths and weaknesses in a fair way. If he played a game for 40 hours, he will almost certainly be able to do so.
The Edge dude is a tool.
First he said he won't review because he lost enthusiasm (unprofessional... since when you don't do your paid job due enthusiasm lol)... he said he won't review even in the next issues.
After the backslash he changed to review the game in next issue.
He job is not to be told what to do by a somewhat stupid embargoI thought he was paid to do the job lol
It is not unprofessional, for a critic, to stop consuming a piece of media at one point prior to a formal ending. What do you think how many reviewers have fully beaten the F-Zero GX story mode before writing their review, for instance? Just because Death Stranding is a story-based game does not mean the reviewer has a moral or even formal obligation to finish the game. Afte 40 hours he has absolutely enough experience with the gameplay systems, world design, mission design, tech, tone and direction of the story to write a very competent and professional review. The only one thing he may be missing is some surprise story twist, but if 40 hours of gameplay are trash to him, how would even a clever ending to the story change anything about him thinking it is a bad game?If you are alright with unprofessionalism... fine.
I'm not.
I hope you never had to deal with guys like him that only do part of their jobs in real life.
The embargo is fine and all story-driven games needs to have it... exceptions are games that have no ending.You are making this up, unless you can point me to the source?
He job is not to be told what to do by a somewhat stupid embargo
Fun excuses! what next, a good video game isn't supposed to have a good gameplay?
The embargo is fine and all story-driven games needs to have it... exceptions are games that have no ending.
Source: his tweets (I won't do the reviews in next issues) and the Edge's article (I will do the review in next issue).
It is not unprofessional, for a critic, to stop consuming a piece of media at one point prior to a formal ending. What do you think how many reviewers have fully beaten the F-Zero GX story mode before writing their review, for instance? Just because Death Stranding is a story-based game does not mean the reviewer has a moral or even formal obligation to finish the game. Afte 40 hours he has absolutely enough experience with the gameplay systems, world design, mission design, tech, tone and direction of the story to write a very competent and professional review. The only one thing he may be missing is some surprise story twist, but if 40 hours of gameplay are trash to him, how would even a clever ending to the story change anything about him thinking it is a bad game?
After 40 hours, you"d imagine he would've almost completed the game.The embargo in my view is not fine, there are plenty of variables and being forced to finish a 40-60 hour game before you are able to publish a review is insane. I accept that sometimes the ending makes the film (Blair Witch springs to mind) but your looking at 2 hours in length.
The article was written before the tweet. Which if taken literally means there won't be a review.
How is a reviewer not suited for the game just because he decides, after 40 hours, it is trash and not worth continuing? It's not like he is complaining it is too difficult, he is complaining it is too boring. Which is a pretty significant criticism of a game. I also do not see what is childish about his tweet. He explained why there will not formally be a review, but an extended preview. It is only fair he explains it to potential buyers of the magazine.Then why the childish tweet? Just stop and give the game to a more suited reviewer? Write a second opinion about how you couldn't finish the game and are married.
So you want him to finish and give his inevitable bad score? You prob will be happier with a none scoreIf you are alright with unprofessionalism... fine.
I'm not.
I hope you never had to deal with guys like him that only do part of their jobs in real life.
It is not unprofessional, for a critic, to stop consuming a piece of media at one point prior to a formal ending. What do you think how many reviewers have fully beaten the F-Zero GX story mode before writing their review, for instance? Just because Death Stranding is a story-based game does not mean the reviewer has a moral or even formal obligation to finish the game. Afte 40 hours he has absolutely enough experience with the gameplay systems, world design, mission design, tech, tone and direction of the story to write a very competent and professional review. The only one thing he may be missing is some surprise story twist, but if 40 hours of gameplay are trash to him, how would even a clever ending to the story change anything about him thinking it is a bad game?
who else is a fan of Kojima's other games but is skipping this one?
People are mad because Kojima's name is attached to this whole mess.How is a reviewer not suited for the game just because he decides, after 40 hours, it is trash and not worth continuing? It's not like he is complaining it is too difficult, he is complaining it is too boring. Which is a pretty significant criticism of a game. I also do not see what is childish about his tweet. He explained why there will not formally be a review, but an extended preview. It is only fair he explains it to potential buyers of the magazine.
No one can be so cruel as to hate Super Mario World 2.
I prefer to have all reviews scores on Meta no matter the score... like I said the score is not important... his attitude is.So you want him to finish and give his inevitable bad score? You prob will be happier with a none score
People complain that the game is easy?We don't know if his 40hours was full of struggling on the first chapters, although i believe that if you have a project to complete, a review, a site to construct, whatever that is you should be responcible enought to inform your boss that you aren't good enough to finish it and give it to someone else. I mean if you don't like something you don't need 40hours to realize it. I can understand that for gaming reviews that's hard because the reviewer redeems the code on his account. That's easily fixable if the publications have a commong account for the reviews so everyone can use it.
Something like that happened when gamespot reviewed Skyward Sword and the first sentence of the reviewer was i don't like motion control in games. I don't see the reason to pick someone that is already biased towards something.
Fun excuses! what next, a good video game isn't supposed to have a good gameplay?
People complain that the game is easy?
How come he has been struggling for 40 hours and not be able to finish the game?
You know, the game is certainly not for me, because I am a gameplay first kind of person and if the gameplay is tedious, then I think the game is junk. But it is fine to think that also a game that is mechanically not fun is a quality product. Similar to how a book need not be fun to be meaningful, in principle a game could have artistic qualities that go beyond the entertainment value. I do not think that product reviews are a good way to reflect on such artistic merit and it stands to question whether Death Stranding does have strong artistic merit beyond its entertainment value (and I do not know that, so no opinion from me here), but considering the character cult that some exhibit in terms of Kojima, it is of course a distinct possibility that the game is just being overinflated by some strong reviews. Time will tell.People are mad because Kojima's name is attached to this whole mess.
I'm having a blast watching people redefine the English language in order to justify this boring piece of software.
"Oh, the game is not 'fun' but it's worth it."
"What is 'fun'?"
"This game is really hard to define. It's not 'fun' in the traditional sense."
That doesn't explain why he didn't beat the game after 40 hours.Struggling in the sense that if you don't like something you are barely doing what the game requires. The game is indeed very easy even on hard.
Actually he had 3 weeks like every other reviewers.That doesn't explain why he didn't beat the game after 40 hours.
If it's easy even on hard and you're being paid to review the game, the most logical thing to do is rush through it.
Best of all, he had two weeks to do so.
Makes no sense whatsoever.