besada said:After finally getting some sleep, I had another interesting thought about why Denis has gotten such a strong reaction from GAF for so long. He broke the unwritten rule of GAF developers, which is: Thou shalt minimize thy marketing.
GAF doesn't like to be sold to (well, at least no in such an open manner). It's why we frown on guys hyping their websites, and why we frown on viral marketers.
Compare Denis's behavior to other devs on GAF:
Denis only posts about Denis. He virtually never shows up in any topic that isn't about SK or TH.
Denis is always selling TH. He's been hyping the game since he's been here, and it's his primary reason for posting.
Compare that with folks like bishoptl. He was quiet enough about his connection with Turok that some users didn't even know he was connected. I don't recall him making multiple threads wherein he told us all how great and magnificent the game was going to be. In short, he didn't come here to market to us.
Or Gazunta, who, sure, puts in a joking little "Buy Party Animals" pretty frequently, but doesn't feel the need to start his own threads praising his game. More importantly, both Gazunta and bishoptl and a dozen other devs are part of the community, here as gamers, not salesmen.
Denis came to us as a salesman, and he got treated like a salesman. There's a good lesson there for other devs. We're here for our reasons, not yours. If we can help you, that's nice, but it's not our primary function. Our function is to critique, review, rip-apart, laud, abuse, and praise the games we play. Try to market through us, and the results are always going to be unpredictable.
Evonus said:If I didn't enter threads pertaining to Too Human, I wouldn't know that he was a member.
EternalGamer said:Actually, I agree with Ca1amity. The way Dyack carried out his supposed "experiment" should, at the very least raise suspicion. And his constant focus on NeoGaf alone does seem to indicate that this is more of a personal response buried in the guise of some more sophisticated rhetoric. Again, however, I don't think even these possible underlying intentions completely dismiss the points he was making or necessarily invalidate them. It just means his motivation for making the argument isn't exactly intellectually pure. But I wonder if any of us ever make arguments that really are completely lacking in personal affilaition in some way. Most just aren't this transparent...
EternalGamer said:Whoa, since when does moderators demanding civility infringe upon basic human rights? Look, if you come to my house and insult my family or make disparaging racial, sexists, or homophobic remarks, I might (after several warnings), show you the door. That does not in any way mean I am infringing upon your civil rights or your free speech in particular. As was discussed earlier, freedom of speech means freedom from government intervention. The social consequences (such as being excluded from a group, asked to leave a private residence, or being banned from a forum) does not have anything to do with free speech or any other basic human rights.
EternalGamer said:But I do think he has shown a great deal more emotional restraint than most of the people who responded to his posts. He made a few bad judgement calls, but that is no justification for the absurd sense of indignation which many displayed or the perverse amount of ridicule they heaped upon him thereafter.
jinko said:First of all think how you act towards someone face to face, if you met up with Denis to discuss his game, would you say the likes of "Dude you game is shit, it sucks balls so bad" I very much doubt it.
I took N train to airport and stopped at The NeoGAF.impirius said:Do you get there from the google?
Ether_Snake said:A video game is a product, not a life achievement!
sennin said:Fair enough, I can agree with you on this, but I'd take the liberty of not raising specific examples as it runs the risk ............I see is an adult bully who is attempting to over-exert his authority on noisy kids.
I'm not sure I entirely agree, because there are reasons I find Dyack offensive that have nothing to do with his used-car salesman demeanor. But I do think you're mostly right.besada said:After finally getting some sleep, I had another interesting thought about why Denis has gotten such a strong reaction from GAF for so long. He broke the unwritten rule of GAF developers, which is: Thou shalt minimize thy marketing.
GAF doesn't like to be sold to (well, at least no in such an open manner). It's why we frown on guys hyping their websites, and why we frown on viral marketers.
Compare Denis's behavior to other devs on GAF:
Denis only posts about Denis. He virtually never shows up in any topic that isn't about SK or TH.
Denis is always selling TH. He's been hyping the game since he's been here, and it's his primary reason for posting.
Compare that with folks like bishoptl. He was quiet enough about his connection with Turok that some users didn't even know he was connected. I don't recall him making multiple threads wherein he told us all how great and magnificent the game was going to be. In short, he didn't come here to market to us.
Or Gazunta, who, sure, puts in a joking little "Buy Party Animals" pretty frequently, but doesn't feel the need to start his own threads praising his game. More importantly, both Gazunta and bishoptl and a dozen other devs are part of the community, here as gamers, not salesmen.
Denis came to us as a salesman, and he got treated like a salesman. There's a good lesson there for other devs. We're here for our reasons, not yours. If we can help you, that's nice, but it's not our primary function. Our function is to critique, review, rip-apart, laud, abuse, and praise the games we play. Try to market through us, and the results are always going to be unpredictable.
Stuneseht said:Correct me if I'm wrong, but i don't think that the majority of NeoGaf are children.
I think Denis calls it "the GAF" because he's looking it as "the gaming-age forums" and not GAF as a single name.impirius said:Do you get there from the google?
Ether_Snake said:A video game is a product, not a life achievement!
Fallout-NL said:Bullshit. I would've been so goddamn proud and content had I been responsible for creating Doom or Half-Life.
NullPointer said:Theres no reason it can't be both.
Duck said:I think Denis calls it "the GAF" because he's looking it as "the gaming-age forums" and not GAF as a single name.
besada said:After finally getting some sleep, I had another interesting thought about why Denis has gotten such a strong reaction from GAF for so long. He broke the unwritten rule of GAF developers, which is: Thou shalt minimize thy marketing.
GAF doesn't like to be sold to (well, at least no in such an open manner). It's why we frown on guys hyping their websites, and why we frown on viral marketers.
Compare Denis's behavior to other devs on GAF:
Denis only posts about Denis. He virtually never shows up in any topic that isn't about SK or TH.
Denis is always selling TH. He's been hyping the game since he's been here, and it's his primary reason for posting.
Compare that with folks like bishoptl. He was quiet enough about his connection with Turok that some users didn't even know he was connected. I don't recall him making multiple threads wherein he told us all how great and magnificent the game was going to be. In short, he didn't come here to market to us.
Or Gazunta, who, sure, puts in a joking little "Buy Party Animals" pretty frequently, but doesn't feel the need to start his own threads praising his game. More importantly, both Gazunta and bishoptl and a dozen other devs are part of the community, here as gamers, not salesmen.
Denis came to us as a salesman, and he got treated like a salesman. There's a good lesson there for other devs. We're here for our reasons, not yours. If we can help you, that's nice, but it's not our primary function. Our function is to critique, review, rip-apart, laud, abuse, and praise the games we play. Try to market through us, and the results are always going to be unpredictable.
Y2Kev said:I took N train to airport and stopped at The NeoGAF.
GAF doesn't like to be sold to (well, at least no in such an open manner). It's why we frown on guys hyping their websites, and why we frown on viral marketers.
seattle6418 said:I only read the first post, and i can already say that this is the biggest piece of crap i've ever read here.
So now he's pulling for censorship? Can't stand freedom?
What do you think Peter Jackson considers Lord of the Rings to be?Ether_Snake said:So? You can be proud of something and yet accept that if it's not perfect or even enjoyed, it doesn't mean your a piece of trash and have to ask your maker for a second chance at life!
Sure, but don't make it a life achievement if it will push you to the brink and get in a war with some random internet forum, losing sleep on the issue, etc.
Come on.
It's like Kojima foretold Denis Dyack's actions on GAF through MGS.Spoo said:I'm telling you man, it's the La Li Lu Le Lo. I don't even know why, but something in my brain is telling me to buy this game.
I don't want to buy this game, but already I feel a need inside. Deep inside.
Iaido Sword said:What do you think Peter Jackson considers Lord of the Rings to be?
Stuneseht said:Can someone make a progress report thread on how NeoGaf is treating them? In other words, a thread where members can express their opinions on how NeoGaf is treating them so far.
I truly want to know how damaging NeoGaf really is or even if it is.
Elbrain said:So I wonder one thing how come Denis thinks tags are currency? Seriously can we trade tags or something and give them out when we want, are people really offended once they get tagged with a horrible one?
Wasn't it you who went nuts in that Ubisoft threadEther_Snake said:The question: Would he spend hours and hours thinking about what people are writing on some forum about his work, for months and months, post replies, argue, and then go and bitch to Ain't It Cool News about one specific forum?
Seriously. Dyack is not being professional here. He could have focused on his game instead, stop worrying, they do play tests at their studio and all, they have feed back from journalists too, etc. Why can't he do like everyone else? It's not making his fucking game better to bitch about NeoGAF!
You guys have no idea what games I've worked on or what I'm currently working on, and heck you probably can't name one person who works on it either, but it's an extremely well known title here. I can tell you that the top five people in charge of the team read Gaf (and other forums) when a thread about game is made, they take the comments and react accordingly (bring adjustments to the games or not), the team talks about the feedback they read also, but they don't post here wasting their breaths. Why here and not at another random forum? Plus, all forum posters = a pin sized portion of all gamers who will play the game.
Waste.of.time.
nestea said:I'm doing good, holding up well. Nice of you to ask.
drohne said:an aversion to dyack's lecturing style is not 'anti-intellectual' -- his parody of scholarship poses more of a threat to the intellect than stupid gaf one-liners. he gleans a shallow idea or two from each of several books he's recently read -- this drucker seems to yield the idea that organizations must do good -- and applies them in some questionable way to his ongoing apology for himself. and he does this with indecent volubility. this method doesn't inspire thought or assent or dissent; it inspires stupefaction. i haven't read the books he's got his hands on now, so i can't evaluate his grasp of them, but in the past he's revealed a poor acquaintance with the names he drops.
after listening to that podcast, though, i'm unsure whether he behaves this way out of a desire to impress or just an eccentric kind of enthusiasm -- reading his interviews, i was sure it was entirely the former
ShockingAlberto said:Wasn't it you who went nuts in that Ubisoft thread
IMO, people with no shame deserves to be humbled and ridicule.heliosRAzi said:GAF can affect a person's life. There was a user on the OT who got embarrassed because of the internet detectives going too far. That is when EviLore made that announcement.
Before that was aztrex who decided to make a thread stating that he would like to try sucking dick once. He ended up doing it and thanked his partner for the hospitality and napkins. A few months after that, aztrex was talking about his girl or some such and we found out that he likes the big ones, a miniscule kind of thing. But then it blew up, got dugg, and the OT managed to bring all of the NEOGAF down to its knees with 500 errors.
This is the thread: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=246732&page=11&highlight=aztrex
Apparently, he sent a folder of shemale porn to a girl he likes by accident... and then hilarity ensued.
The internet can affect people in real life, but it's rare because most people have to sense to leave.
Elbrain said:So I wonder one thing how come Denis thinks tags are currency? Seriously can we trade tags or something and give them out when we want, are people really offended once they get tagged with a horrible one?
Atrophis said:Dennis Dyack...the new Derek Smart?
Perhaps a tad too harsh :lol
heliosRAzi said:GAF can affect a person's life. There was a user on the OT who got embarrassed because of the internet detectives going too far. That is when EviLore made that announcement.
Before that was aztrex who decided to make a thread stating that he would like to try sucking dick once. He ended up doing it and thanked his partner for the hospitality and napkins. A few months after that, aztrex was talking about his girl or some such and we found out that he likes the big ones, a miniscule kind of thing. But then it blew up, got dugg, and the OT managed to bring all of the NEOGAF down to its knees with 500 errors.
This is the thread: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=246732&page=11&highlight=aztrex
Apparently, he sent a folder of shemale porn to a girl he likes by accident... and then hilarity ensued.
The internet can affect people in real life, but it's rare because most people have to sense to leave.
Ether_Snake said:A video game is a product, not a life achievement!
heliosRAzi said:GAF can affect a person's life. There was a user on the OT who got embarrassed because of the internet detectives going too far. That is when EviLore made that announcement.
Before that was aztrex who decided to make a thread stating that he would like to try sucking dick once. He ended up doing it and thanked his partner for the hospitality and napkins. A few months after that, aztrex was talking about his girl or some such and we found out that he likes the big ones, a miniscule kind of thing. But then it blew up, got dugg, and the OT managed to bring all of the NEOGAF down to its knees with 500 errors.
This is the thread: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=246732&page=11&highlight=aztrex
Apparently, he sent a folder of shemale porn to a girl he likes by accident... and then hilarity ensued.
The internet can affect people in real life, but it's rare because most people have to sense to leave.
Ether_Snake said:Seriously. Dyack is not being professional here. He could have focused on his game instead, stop worrying, they do play tests at their studio and all, they have feed back from journalists too, etc. Why can't he do like everyone else? It's not making his fucking game better to bitch about NeoGAF!
heliosRAzi said:GAF can affect a person's life.
PuppetMaster said:He affected his own life! He had no one to blame for his embarassment but himself.
Just like Denis has no one else to blame but himself if his game is an embarassment.
Blaming GAF for thier social suicides is like blaming the ground for someones death when they intentionally jump off a building.