One interesting thing was that it seems like he's starting to backpedal on the demo he promised over a year ago. At the time he was so adamant about it, but now he says "I'm FOR a demo," intimating that Microsoft might be pushing them not to release one. Which would lead to the next question -- why doesn't Microsoft want them to release a demo? Garnett calls him on that ever so slightly, but as in the rest of the podcast, he bows the floor to Dyack and fails to follow up.
There is a whole veil over the Microsoft-SK angle on this game that we only catch faint glimpses of in the Microsoft-Epic complaint. From what Dyack has said, it's pretty obvious that he did not want TH on the floor at that fateful 2006 E3 (I wish to god one of the 1Up'ers would ask about this). It wouldn't be apropos for him to lash out at his publisher for making him put a bad build on the floor, so instead he lashed out at the community of journalists. Now this attack has expanded to include the evil journalists that put negative semi-evaluative statements in their recent previews, as well as the gamers that have reacted to those previews.
It will be interesting to see whether Microsoft gives the game a "good faith" marketing push with lots of TV/internet/print ads, or whether they simply cut their losses and send it to die like they did with Shadowrun. Right now it's kind of hard to glean where they stand on the game, whereas with Shadowrun the $60 pricetag immediately told you that they were done with it.
Denis Dyack said:
What I have found with companies, if they're unethical, eventually if they continue to be unethical, they make mistakes, they hurt everyone, and they will eventually go down.
That's kinda funny considering the name of the company on his paychecks.
DCharlie said:
as we said at the time - use gaf, everyone who plays the game says what they think.
Huh? How can you expect GAF posters to be honest about their opinion of the game when they're the ones that made the bet? Presumably everyone will just voice whatever opinion doesn't get them a humiliating tag. At that point it just becomes a numbers game of how many supporters there are versus how many detractors there are. That makes it an election rather than a wager.