He's not wrong. I don't understand the uproar.
Sure he is, unless you mean to say that this headline they've created isn't reporting on the official comment by Bungie but just an unrelated speculation cloaked in invulnerability by the word "may."
Unexpected problems may cause Destiny's servers to shut down forever on Thursday, May 14th, 2015. What, I'm not wrong.
No he isn't reporting facts, he's reporting a possibility based on the limited information in the update, which indicated new details for the deployment schedule.
He's not "reporting on a possibility."
That would be this:
Deej: "The issue we've identified with Patch 1.2.0 may result in the release of House of Wolves being delayed."
Headline: "Bungie Finds Problem With Destiny Update, House Of Wolves Release May Be Affected"
Note how now, the headline reports on a possibility that was mentioned by Bungie.
This possibility was not mentioned in reality. You can make the case that it should have been, I guess, because if the issue
does wind up delaying the release of the expansion, they will not have specified that possibility as early as they could have.
I don't see the problem either. If there are last minute problems isn't it possible that it could affect the timing of the DLC release?
Anything's
possible, but are you telling me that the layman will understand that the author of the headline is just speculating, rather than reporting on what was said by the developer? Or is it fair to say that headline seems to imply that Bungie mentioned the release might be affected?
So you can only talk about any possible delay after there is official word of a delay?
As they've demonstrated, you can talk about whatever you want, regardless of journalistic value.
Its a fair point to at least inform the audience that changes might be afoot.
It would be a fair point if that was what they're doing, but they're including more information- information they don't have- than was provided by the source they purport to be reporting on.