texhnolyze
Banned
Thanks ! It would be superior to PS4 you think ?
Remember that PS4 is 30fps, ao if you're aiming for that you can easily surpass PS4 IQ. If you're aiming for 60fps, however, IQ might be a bit worse than PS4.
Thanks ! It would be superior to PS4 you think ?
Never got mine from Simply Games but I'm beside Glasgow so that's probably why.I got mine this morning at 9:30.
They ship from Northampton so I can see it taking a bit longer but if they shipped it yesterday morning then you should have had it by this evening.Never got mine from Simply Games but I'm beside Glasgow so that's probably why.
THEY REMOVED THIS !!
![]()
Never got mine from Simply Games but I'm beside Glasgow so that's probably why.
Whenever I've had that happen with games, I tried reinstalling while disconnected from the internet and it would work.I got my Xbox copy this morning. But the installation keeps failing at 63%. Any ideas people?
THEY REMOVED THIS !!
![]()
They ship from Northampton so I can see it taking a bit longer but if they shipped it yesterday morning then you should have had it by this evening.
What time did it get dispatched?
why were there reports of excellent performance early on (from a NeoGaf member)??...I think the guy said you can get close to 60fps with a GTX 770...
Some dips and stuttering in the hub city at least, not sure how frequent that issue is during mission areas.Is ps4 a solid 30fps or are there dips?
why so few impressions from gaffers? or is everyone in the spoiler thread?
I'd like to know what GAF thinks
Was shipped at 8:17 am yesterday - no luck and we don't get a second post up here anymore.
Weird though because I got NMS the day after ordering it the other week.
Edited in the correct shipping time
PS4 is most definitely a mix of high and medium. It has things like SSS, SSR and cloth physics which are absent in PC's medium but present in high, the texture resolution is higher than PC equivalent of medium as well. The AF is most likely 2x or 4x..no more. The LOD distance for objects would be probably be medium (although this is one thing that could be individually tweaked for consoles to be around low). The POM looks like a 1:1 match to PC's high than medium (where it is just..on)...but it looks weird due to low AF and sharpening. On the other hand shadows are definitely medium and motion blur of any sorts seems to be absent in PS4 version.To be fair Ultra Settings seem to kill performance. Switching from Ultra to High nearly doubles performance. And Medium settings (maybe PS4 level...) should run good on most 'gaming' PCs (hopefully).
https://youtu.be/02uxM3vyClY
Intel Core i7 6700K 4.00 GHz
16 GB DDR4 RAM
Palit GeForce GTX 980 Ti Super Jetstream 6GB
MSI Z170A PC Mate Mainboard
Windows 10 Pro 64bit
![]()
![]()
I'll skip MSAA and go for their temporal AA solution on my 980. A mix between high and ultra could be doable.
I'll skip MSAA and go for their temporal AA solution on my 980. A mix between high and ultra could be doable.
To be fair Ultra Settings seem to kill performance. Switching from Ultra to High nearly doubles performance. And Medium settings (maybe PS4 level...) should run good on most 'gaming' PCs (hopefully).
![]()
![]()
After reading some of the reviews, it sounds like Eidos M may be planning to follow up on the ending with DLC. We already know there is a $30 season pass, and they've previously done The Missing Link which bridged a gap in Human Revolution's story.
So, I reckon this isn't really the ending, and that one of the future DLC packs will rectify the issue.
It's not an ideal solution, but frankly I'd rather pay $30 and get my ending DLC in a few months rather wait another 5 years for the next game.if true that is some bull shit
if they want to make extra content, fine.. but not at the expense of the game's climax
THEY REMOVED THIS !!
![]()
It's not an ideal solution, but frankly I'd rather pay $30 and get my ending DLC in a few months rather wait another 5 years for the next game.
if true that is some bull shit
if they want to make extra content, fine.. but not at the expense of the game's climax
It's not an ideal solution, but frankly I'd rather pay $30 and get my ending DLC in a few months rather wait another 5 years for the next game.
That makes two of us. I was theorizing on the reason behind the ending being lackluster, and I think the $30 season pass has to do with it. I don't like it, but it would make sense if that was the plan.I'd rather pay 60 bucks and get a complete game, but perhaps that's just old-fashioned of me.
Yeah, but that rarely happens these days.I think I would have been fine with the idea if this was said from the start, and if the content of both the game and the story dlc justified both of their respective costs. Obviously a completely unsatisfactory end to the game without the dlc and no explanation that this would be happening, is ridiculous.
I'd rather pay 60 bucks and get a complete game, but perhaps that's just old-fashioned of me.
Not that I've seen, but you should play Human Revolution anyway. It's a great gem in its own right.Have never played a DE game before, is there any word on how accessible this one is to newcomers? Both from a story and a gameplay perspective.
Have never played a DE game before, is there any word on how accessible this one is to newcomers? Both from a story and a gameplay perspective.
The author of that AreaJugones review is translated as "launching date".
May be you want to change it.
Jeff said all versions are fine. You have your usual fps drops on consoles.Have there been any impressions from the Xbox version's performance? From the IGN video the resolution looks slightly lower, so probably 900p or above, but nothing about performance.
I got the game this morning
So far:
-Art direction is top. Atmosphere is great as always. I've seen the gameplay videos in the past but playing Prague yourself is really cool. Seems like such a massive area to explore. Very atmospheric and nice to explore somewhere set in the day time.
-Music seems great so far
-Frame rate is pretty smooth, noticeable drops during some conversations though
-Graphics seem decent, some character models are pretty low compared to others
- Hacking is better, it doesn't look as good as HR but its easier to do. No weird holding the left stick forward and releasing the button.
- I've noticed the voice syncing is off some time
- I had some serious pop in during a scene in the second mission / area. It was kinda funny actually.
- The HUD is so cluttered with icons I wish I could make them smaller or something. Maybe I should look into the settings (I did and you can turn off alot of options and scale the HUD which is great)
- Shooting doesn't feel that good. I played HR as stealth, but when I used weapons they seemed better than this game
Hmm, hopefully the fps drops occur less on S.Jeff said all versions are fine. You have your usual fps drops on consoles.
It's not an ideal solution, but frankly I'd rather pay $30 and get my ending DLC in a few months rather wait another 5 years for the next game.
Hence why I said it's not ideal. It's just a situation where I have to pick between bad or worse. YMMV but I wouldn't want to wait another 5 years for something that should have been in the game to begin with.Or they could just finish the game like everyone else.
How people bend over for these BS tactics, jesus...
Hmm, hopefully the fps drops occur less on S.
It could be a mixture of several things such high precision AO, full resolution SSR, and full resolution volumetric lights and shadows (especially with contact hardening shadows) they require lots of computational grunt. Ultra LOD could also be one of the reasons seeing how dense the environments are it could lead to drop in performance if the game renders objects at full detail even at distance.I bet it's something like volumetric lighting on ultra that butchers performance.
It's most likely full resolution volumetric lights and shadows (especially with contact hardening shadows) they require lots of computational grunt. Ultra LOD could also be one of the reasons seeing how dense the environments are it could lead to drop in performance if the game renders objects at full detail even at distance. And maybe fully resolution SSR as well.
I only see high and ultra..when benchmarks say v high they probably just mean ultra.Isn't there Very High between High and Ultra? Possible that V. High is full res and Ultra is 2x.
Isn't S just slimmed down XBO with same HW / performance?
Ultra will leave your Framerate Divided... I'll be here all week folks.
The S GPU has an extra 7% overclock, in games like Batman Arkham Knight for example the performance sticks to 30fps better.Isn't S just slimmed down XBO with same HW / performance?