DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Yes. Always have been.The rewards programs come for free??
Last edited:
Yes. Always have been.The rewards programs come for free??
So you bought a PS4, never spent any more money on anything for it and got a $9 RDR2??Yes. Always have been.
You really need to stop lying.ifffff they put on series s they can on switch 2 for the monies when pc comes digital clowdry didn't even think switch could do dlss ahahahahahahah
2560 x 1152 if his calculation is correct for a rough resolution count.
Possibly using FSR1 / some kind of spatial upscaler.
Are we going to be pedantic?So you bought a PS4, never spent any more money on anything for it and got a $9 RDR2??
So you had to spend money and time to get the discounts. That is not really cheaper.Are we going to be pedantic?
Once again, never paid full price for any PS4 game, ever. When the PS4 launched, Best Buy had GCU, which you could got 2+ years for free when you purchased a $5 prepaid phone card. That was 20%+ off all new games. Thus, games were only $44-$48 instead of $60. You also got rewards points for BB for purchases which converted into rewards coupons $5, $10, $20, etc..
Then you buy the game with the Sony credit card, which gives 5X the points for Sony Electronics or PlayStation purchases. Those points convert very well into PSN currency or physical games in their catalog.
They also had a rewards program tied to it where you get tons of points for unlocking achievements/trophies in games you play. Those were repeatable. Like quests. All those points added up to even more money off for just playing games and doing this you would normally do anyhow. No stress.
They stopped that program because it was insanely easy money and they had to be losing a ton. But now they have their Stars program, which again, gives you points for things you buy, on top of the Sony card points you are using, on top of getting points for just playing games.
All this adds up to where I never payed full price for a game in over 10 years. I've always paid 50% of less for new games, etc.. They have the same sales on games as Steam and the like does, then there's the physical market for consoles that have even deeper sales or second hand.
Once again, the "PC is always cheaper" is an old and tired argument for the past decade. Even the humble bundles and Steam sales are not what they used to be 10+ years ago.
So you had to spend money and time to get the discounts. That is not really cheaper.![]()
What's oof about 1152p, a resolution that will likely be upscaled in any case? The image shown thus far looks pin sharp. You won't be counting the individual pixels onscreen come this game's release, and I also doubt a 60 fps mode will be included; Rockstar never do so for console, as they're trying to maximize fidelity.Oooff. Imagine a 60fps mode. 720p.
And "remaster" revenue streams down the line. The CEO said so as much.What's oof about 1152p, a resolution that will likely be upscaled in any case? The image shown thus far looks pin sharp. You won't be counting the individual pixels onscreen come this game's release, and I also doubt a 60 fps mode will be included; Rockstar never do so for console, as they're trying to maximize fidelity.
The shot of Jason riding on the motorcycle was very likely gameplay as well.Probably not, since the naysayers on here were saying it only looks that good because it was all "cinematic cut-scenes."
![]()
I bet him shooting out the window was gameplay, with the camera moved since you can do that in GTAV. An improvement to shooting out a car window too since the previous game only the arm stuck out, now you have full body over the shoulder camera adjustment.
likely bottom gif
How so?Very sobering video for players on the Sony consoles.
It is a shit resolution even for DLSS. Combine that with 30fps shit show...What's oof about 1152p, a resolution that will likely be upscaled in any case? The image shown thus far looks pin sharp. You won't be counting the individual pixels onscreen come this game's release, and I also doubt a 60 fps mode will be included; Rockstar never do so for console, as they're trying to maximize fidelity.
Have you ever played GTA? Guess its the Style
Sounds like your problem.30fps is horrible on OLED TV's. Very underwhelming this GTA6 game.
It's certainly not ideal, but I can accept 30fps with that kind of visual fidelity. I'd hope for at least a 40fps mode on the pro, but rockstar doesn't have the best track record when it comes to pro modes. We'll see.
How so?
So you want worse graphics then?It is a shit resolution even for DLSS. Combine that with 30fps shit show...
What is the point of better graphics if it's all blurry/full of artifacts??? Take screenshots in photo mode??So you want worse graphics then?
who says it is blurry and full of artifacts, the game isnt out yetWhat is the point of better graphics if it's all blurry/full of artifacts??? Take screenshots in photo mode??
Hair has pretty horrible artifacts in motion both trailers, plenty time to fix it, especially on ps5pr0 with its pssr ai upscaling, which would be logical choice from rockstar, we will know closer to or at launch 4sure.FSR1?
Please no...
If even 4k + DLSS quality is still a little blurry what do you think 1152p FSR1 is???who says it is blurry and full of artifacts, the game isnt out yet
When did 1440p equivalent pixel density become shit resolution? It's 1152p because they added black bars for the trailer, which won't be in the final game. At that pixel density, it looks pretty good even without AI upscaling.It is a shit resolution even for DLSS. Combine that with 30fps shit show...
If even 4k + DLSS quality is still a little blurry what do you think 1152p FSR1 is???
Since it was combined with 30fps and FSR1.When did 1440p equivalent pixel density become shit resolution? It's 1152p because they added black bars for the trailer, which won't be in the final game. At that pixel density, it looks pretty good even without AI upscaling.
I didn't say it is 4k native. I meant to set your resolution to 4k and enable DLSS quality. That is how it works on PC.4k + DLSS quality is not 4k. It's 1440p. Same as the trailer. A little blurry, sure. Not shit.
If even 4k + DLSS quality is still a little blurry what do you think 1152p FSR1 is???
Since GTA6 is not coming out on consoles and pc at the same time, some are trying to push the narrative that the console version will be pointless due to hardware limitations. I guess that's a way to cope
Ok. I won't argue with that. For consoles, I wasn't expecting more, given what's happening in terms of effects. Seems like a worthy tradeoff for this type of game.Since it was combined with 30fps and FSR1.
Did I say DLSS quality is not up to my standards??If 4k + DLSS quality is not up to your visual standards then I don't know what to tell you, the game was always going to be a let down for you so why bother whining about it.
This type of game makes everything blurry with artifacts ok how? Because afaik, not a single type of game is ok like this. Maybe F2P games.Seems like a worthy tradeoff for this type of game.
You said it is "a little blurry"Did I say DLSS quality is not up to my standards??
This is 100% what's happening these days.because DF came down from the mountain with a proclamation of the pixel counts the whining starts.
Where is this "everything blurry with artifacts" happening? Some screenshots would be useful.This type of game makes everything blurry with artifacts ok how? Because afaik, not a single type of game is ok like this. Maybe F2P games.
you gonna repeat this same shit in every GTA thread?30fps is horrible on OLED TV's. Very underwhelming this GTA6 game.
I said but I never said anything about where I draw the line. And I was not raving anything yesterday.You said it is "a little blurry"
this is a high-end game with the highest production values ever. It's running on a fixed piece of hardware. It's annoying to see people whine about numbers without a finished game and with no context. Just yesterday everyone was raving about how good it looked and Rockstar said it's captured off a Ps5. But today because DF came down from the mountain with a proclamation of the pixel counts the whining starts. I really don't understand what people want and expect and why the DF pixel count matters so much.
In every game before with that kind of resolution + FSR1. If this is the first game that IQ don't suck in the end, good.Where is this "everything blurry with artifacts" happening? Some screenshots would be useful.
The irony is that it didn't even matter to DF so much. They were drooling all over it.I really don't understand what people want and expect and why the DF pixel count matters so much.
this is why I asked you if you wanted worse graphics. Because those are the only two options.I said but I never said anything about where I draw the line. And I was not raving anything yesterday.
30fps is horrible on OLED TV's. Very underwhelming this GTA6 game.
What if the game supports the pro and gives you 4k DLSS quality level IQ via updated PSSR next year? Would you still find it unacceptable because of 30 FPS?In every game before with that kind of resolution + FSR1. If this is the first game that IQ don't suck in the end, good.
Well, none then.this is why I asked you if you wanted worse graphics. Because those are the only two options.
Yes. 30fps only option is never acceptable. Maybe for free.What if the game supports the pro and gives you 4k DLSS quality level IQ via updated PSSR next year? Would you still find it unacceptable because of 30 FPS?