Xenoblade X is on it's way...
And how is this better looking than watch dogs again?
Xenoblade X is on it's way...
They sure will. Looks like a gorgeous game and will more than likely be RPG of 2015 (only real comp being FFXV*)**
*if it ships
*if it's any good
I don't understand why there isn't some sort of a bottom FPS limit for console games. A game shouldn't be considered as finished if driving around town causes drops to 20 FPS
So .. this is exactly the same case as Black Flag on WiiU.
When the games released we had individual posters claiming how it was such a huge improvement over PS3/360, but then the face/off's came out....
I can see that it's nice and sharp, but I wouldn't have said beautiful. Perhaps I've been spoilt by other games I've been playing lately.I don't know what you're seeing Dave, but that game looks beautiful.
They sure will. Looks like a gorgeous game and will more than likely be RPG of 2015 (only real comp being FFXV*)**
*if it ships
*if it's any good
I don't know what you're seeing Dave, but that game looks beautiful.
Yeah, I wonder what happened to Nintendo quality control. This should not be allowed to ship, that is worse than AC Unity. Ubisoft making the PS3 look like a multiplatform beast.
And how is this better looking than watch dogs again?
Pssshhh. Yeah right.Sure, if Bloodborne and The Witcher 3 didn't exist.
I thought the same about FFXIII too. And then...We'll know when the demo releases this March but I'm already convinced it will be good because of all the interview and snippets of the game coming out recently. Add that to the darker story that Nomura wants then it will probably be my GOTY once it comes out. If not then Xenoblade wins automatically since I'm a mecha fan.
QC doesn't make those kind of judgments anymore.
You know nothing! >OPssshhh. Yeah right.
This is a shame. All 1st parties should have a locked 30fps minimum with only rare dips allowed.
Nintendo just designed a console for themselves again, not for any 3rd parties
I doubt that one's going to be city-based. Just look at that low poly car, nasty ...
Xenoblade X is on it's way...
When poor hardware meets a poor port, hilarity arises!
Coming soon to a Wii U near you.
Eh, that does look kinda rough. Especially the car on the right hand side and the flat background in the distance. Still, it's early in development isn't it?
Is there a link to the video that gif is taken from?
I can see that it's nice and sharp, but I wouldn't have said beautiful. Perhaps I've been spoilt by other games I've been playing lately.
so you are sure X is good?
Xenoblade X is on it's way...
M°°nblade;140486083 said:I doubt that one's going to be city-based. Just look at that low poly car, nasty ...
Ontopic:
Did people really expect the Wii U version to be in-between generations or something? It's visually on par with the PS3/X360 version with a variable framerate, just like most other multiplatform games already released.
It is poor hardware (talking in terms of raw power, the efficiency is impressive). It is a poor port (no enhancements whatsoever, 6 months late, fps in the teens). That X gif does look rough to me (the blob of a car, the weird 2Dish background, everything looks so flat).It's cool Dave, ninjablade has got this.
My fellow Ninja Gaiden Black lover has stepped in your shoes with the anti-Wii U agenda. Admittedly, he's not as witty as you but you know, it's early doors.
I have, but it's probably best if I don't give my opinion on foliage, textures and geometry. I will say that the sheer scale of the outdoor areas is impressive. Mountains look mountainous (which isn't as easy to achieve as it seems).Have you seen other parts of the game? Because the city is by far the least impressive part.
Just like I thought it was a crap port even with a six month delay(collecting dust for the most part). Don't know what more poeple expected knowing Ubisoft's stance with the Wii U. Luckily, I remembered to cancel my preorder in time.
Sounds like the game just shouldn't have been a 360/PS3/WiiU title at all. Looks mediocre even by last-gen standards and it has performance issues on all last-gen platforms.
The game is not out yet for another six months... nobody has played it. But going from their previous (Wii) game, it should be. It's an RPG though, but it will have a large open-world. There has been plenty of footage of gameplay, i don't think any large framerate drops were noticed... but other than not sure what you mean or how someone could possibly state to be "sure" a game that is yet to release will be good.
man that looks like shit
And how is this better looking than watch dogs again?
That looks really bad.
This doesn't look better than Watchdogs at all.
I'd say it looks considerably worse.
I also don't think the city in Xenoblade will be anywhere near Watchdogs chicago in size.
Xenoblade X is on it's way...
All I can say is that Xenoblade gif backfired because people missed the point of why it was posted, and the type of game Xenoblade is.
I have, but it's probably best if I don't give my opinion on foliage, textures and geometry. I will say that the sheer scale of the outdoor areas is impressive. Mountains look mountainous (which isn't as easy to achieve as it seems).
Being Ubisoft, maybe 30fps is locked behind a micro transaction.
I wish I was joking
Most likely, anyway with all those huge monsters traversing the environment in Xenonlade X, I'd say the game is holding up well.This doesn't look better than Watchdogs at all.
I'd say it looks considerably worse.
I also don't think the city in Xenoblade will be anywhere near Watchdogs chicago in size.
What do you mean no tearing?Well it has NO TEARING which instantly makes it a hell of a lot better looking than the ps360 versions
Every damn opportunity.http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-vs-watch-dogs-on-wii-u
The wiiu continues the trend of having inferior multiplatform games compared to 360/ps3, and as usual Wiiu owners claim it's a great port, till the DF article comes out.
Bayonetta 1 port is pretty good, thank you.The wiiu continues the trend of having inferior multiplatform games compared to 360/ps3, and as usual Wiiu owners claim it's a great port, till the DF article comes out.
Well it has NO TEARING which instantly makes it a hell of a lot better looking than the ps360 versions
Triple bufferingM°°nblade;140487232 said:What do you mean no tearing?
I'm not an expert on this but even if you use vsync, when the framerate drops to 20-25fps, there's going to be tearing or other artifacts because your framrate doesn't sync with your monitor refresh rate.
Probably due to the shitty CPU. I still don't understand why sacrificed so much just to be ISA-compatible to their last two consoles.
Nintendo hasn't made any large, city based open world games for the WiiU and probably never will. I'm not going to blame lazy devs on this one. Frankly I'm surprised the WiiU version wasn't cancelled altogether.
Uhm.. Come again? Read the original post and you will actually know what you're talking about.dude this thread is about graphics, performance and hardware. the only point of that gif was to show off the graphics, other wise it just doesn't belong here.
I wouldn't be too sure. The Wii U has a much slower CPU than the PS3/360.lol. That's quite a shit port.
I also don't think the city in Xenoblade will be anywhere near Watchdogs chicago in size.
I'm going to pick on you here.Garbage port to a dead console. Nobody should be surprised that Ubisoft mailed this one in.
***** - and what is just dirt cheap.Knowing that we'll likely have to support this console almost independently, maybe we should stick to a design that our teams are comfortable with, and our tools are optmized for, right?*****
Thanks, I'll look it up.Triple buffering
i'd rather have good looking billboard foliage all over the place, than have "actual" 3D foliage in patches here and there (as even PS4 games have to do it).
Dat GTA5 PS4 grass though.
I'm going to pick on you here.
Wii U isn't a dead console. It's very much alive. If anything this year it was reborn. Now it's finding its niche and is living in its own bubble, per the Nintendo usual.
As for Watch Dogs, nobody cares including Ubisoft. This was to be expected.
it boggles my mind why people find this impressive graphically, must be that exclusive factor.
***** - and what is just dirt cheap.