DF basically exists so people can avoid bad ports. If they ignore shit like this I don't know why they should bother covering anything.
That's why they exist at all actually, it's an over critical hyper examination of our preferred choice of entertainment. Yes we live in an era of hyper scrutiny. But there were poor performing games since the dawn of gaming, but there is too much focus on raw performance, and not whether a game is actually good.
Idk, maybe because I have been here from the start looking at things that were barely discernible as to what they were supposed to be, but I just don't get it.
Watch Dogs was a critical turd, and not well liked in general, I just don't see the need for this examination of what's already known as a fairly poor piece of software.