The poster will be funny.
From the writers of post book Game of Thrones and X-Men Origins: Wolverine.
Disney’s gonna drain every last ounce of worth out of that husk formerly known as “Star Wars”, isn’t it? George Lucas might catch shit for the prequels, but the man was damned smart for selling the franchise to Disney and letting them tarnish and ruin it so much that his highly ridiculed prequels look like Citizen Kane by comparison.
It’s spite, and it must feel pretty good to get some retribution.
“You thought the prequels were shitty? Look what Disney is doing and get back to me on that while I wipe my ass with hundred-dollar bills.”
As far as I remember the only problem we had with ROTJ was final seeing Vaders face and realising he is kinda chubby and looks like a school bus driver who has seen some shit! Kinda like the Master Blaster effect from Beyond Thunderdome.So true.
It's completely fair. Both are established universes with their own lore and sets of rules that the writers have to play within. The question isn't whether or not it'll be good, but whether or not it'll be believable. This is where TLJ failed horrendously despite being a decent standalone film and from what I hear from ASOIAF fans, it's where D&D have been failing for the last 2 years with GoT.I don't think it's fair to compare this to the last 2 series of Game Of Thrones.
Nah I feel sorry for Georgie boy. For all the hate he gets you have to remember he let the EU do whatever they want and it's still the best thing about Star Wars (insert joke about Star Wars only being good when Lucas has little to no involvement). There's no way he could have known Disney would have shat on the EU and the SW lore though in hindsight JJ should have been huge red flag. I remember when the ST was announced everyone was hyped as fuck about the books possibly being adapted and it really did seem like they were gonna make SW great again.Nah, shame on Lucas for enabling this, he's ruined Star War's long term legacy with this.
Good job on completely turbo fucking Star Wars in every way, Disney.
Who in their right mind is not sick of Star Wars?
I don't know about Star Trek, but according to him, he was the reason why Casino Royale happened because he really wanted to do a James Bond film. And as much as James Bond ain't Tarantinos style, I think he would have been able to have pulled it off. Tarantino has a very specific style, but we have not seen him do stuff like a bond film or star trek. He might be able to stay "on brand" more than people give him credit for. His films are after all- almost universally a homage to films he himself loves, and he is committed to them.
Time and time again he has shown that he understands genre films. Everything he has tackled, he has done well. Perhaps with the exception of grindhouse, which felt more like he wasn't even trying because it was so pulpy and silly. Stupid for stupid sakes.
I am more interested in why he would want to do Star Trek. Star Treks character and dialogue is the opposite of what Tarantino does best, so I wonder what he sees in that is redeemable. Maybe I just think that because I find Star Treks character and dialogue to be more dry a than sand in Sahara.
I imagine it is one thing to be difficult and the other to butcher it. I get you are trying to be reasonable and fair but as a fan of both franchises. I cannot help but feel disappointed by this move. The previous season was a little hard to watch too but most people were easily dismissive. Now the writing is so bad that the willfully blind are starting to see.Let's see what the writers can do with their own story though.
I don't think it's fair to compare this to the last 2 series of Game Of Thrones.
It must be do difficult to finish off another writers story.
Give them the chance to do their own story from start to finish and see how they get on.
Especially by the time the last movie of the new trilogy comes out in what 2026?