It's not enough to promise change. You have to convince people that change would be appealing.
Don't be fooled by Hillary stans on Gaf. Trump has a real big chance of winning. He'll win florida and Ohio.
When he'll change his rhetoric in the next few months and the attack ads on Hillary will start, you'll see how strong of a candidate he is. He's almost the perfect storm, like obama in 08'.
He'll run his campaign exclusively as an anti-establishement candidate and Hillary embodies the establishment. People always want " change ". They don't care who brings it. No one ever won an election by promising to keep the status quo.
Don't be fooled by Hillary stans on Gaf. Trump has a real big chance of winning. He'll win florida and Ohio.
When he'll change his rhetoric in the next few months and the attack ads on Hillary will start, you'll see how strong of a candidate he is. He's almost the perfect storm, like obama in 08'.
He'll run his campaign exclusively as an anti-establishement candidate and Hillary embodies the establishment. People always want " change ". They don't care who brings it. No one ever won an election by promising to keep the status quo.
This is silly. Obama was consistent throughout his entire campaign.
Explain to me how people who supported him BECAUSE he came to the dance with inflammatory rhetoric are going to continue to do so if he becomes a "moderate" in the GE. Additionally, you think moderate/independent voters and liberals aren't going to see right through that?
"Read my lips: 'Fuck you.'"What about George HW Bush?
This is America. You don't have to be consistent. You only have to be the lesser of two evils. Attack the opposition until you are.
And that's why we have a President Mitt Romney right now. Because the American people really are that stupid and trying to flip-flop from the primary to the general works that well. Wait...This is America. You don't have to be consistent. You only have to be the lesser of two evils. Attack the opposition until you are.
Ironically, Mitt didn't flip in the general. He stuck to most of his conservative positions.And that's why we have a President Mitt Romney right now. Because the American people really are that stupid and trying to flip-flop from the primary to the general works that well. Wait...
Where do people get this from? Honestly, it's like we're thinking of two completely different people.Eh they're both pretty Unlikable compared to Clinton or Reagan. Obama is super arrogant but Hillary is slightly more corrupt so it's a toss up which I don't like more
George W. Bush was re-elected.
Never forget.
He makes a point of doing his job in an election year. Dick!Where do people get this from? Honestly, it's like we're thinking of two completely different people.
So, if I buy into this line of thought, you don't think that the Democrats can't and won't sink him for being a flip-flopping, pandering liar?
You can't scorch the earth and the come back and try to fix it. I think Donald Trump has a path to the Presidency, but I don't think it comes from being inconsistent; I think he continues gaining momentum by going even harder with the rhetoric and attitude that brought him this far to begin with.
This idea that he wins by somehow becoming a super moderate and getting people who hated him previously on board while also keeping his far right base doesn't wash for me.
I think enough people will disregard the pandering flip-flopper claims when he can rightfully throw that grenade right back. The rhetoric and attitude that have gotten him this far is anti-establishment and character assassination. What makes you think he needs to change anything?
I think enough people will disregard the pandering flip-flopper claims when he can rightfully throw that grenade right back. The rhetoric and attitude that have gotten him this far is anti-establishment and character assassination. What makes you think he needs to change anything?
I think enough people will disregard the pandering flip-flopper claims when he can rightfully throw that grenade right back. The rhetoric and attitude that have gotten him this far is anti-establishment and character assassination. What makes you think he needs to change anything?
Because what helps you in a Republican primary doesn't necessarily help you in a general election.
Not always, but this tactic sure sank Kerry.
Not always, but this tactic sure sank Kerry.
Incumbent presidential election after an eventful first term. Admittedly weak Democratic candidate. It was a lot more than just swiftboating that kept W. in office for another term.
Don't be fooled by Hillary stans on Gaf. Trump has a real big chance of winning. He'll win florida and Ohio.
When he'll change his rhetoric in the next few months and the attack ads on Hillary will start, you'll see how strong of a candidate he is. He's almost the perfect storm, like obama in 08'.
He'll run his campaign exclusively as an anti-establishement candidate and Hillary embodies the establishment. People always want " change ". They don't care who brings it. No one ever won an election by promising to keep the status qu
Bernie's core supporters are 18-29 year olds, that normally dont even vote on elections and couldn't propel Bernie to victory anywhere outside NH. This is a hugely unreliable voting bloc and makes up a tiny percentage of the total GE electorate.I predict he will end up our next President. Hardcore Bernie fans have been totally driven away from Hillary, thanks to the negative narratives about her. Some people were already scared of her.
If Bernie were to get the nomination, he'd surely scare away swing voters and anyone against Trump, looking for an alternative. Trump is scary but Sanders is worse.
Plus, the main factor is that the Republicans are motivated to go out and vote, similar to us in 2008. They're tired of not having a Repub leader for almost a decade. Look at the swell of support Trump has gotten so quickly. He is already started to lean more center and will probably end up scaring people less and less. Hell, I'm not even as scared of him as I used to be. He is a giant gimmick and may not even try to keep up with his promises, if elected. Democrat voters are lazy as hell and turnout might be pretty bad and will cost us everything, I think. If HIllary can't motivate Bernie supporters to her side, she is screwed.
Trump would have a chance of winning if the Republican electorate was the general electorate - unfortunately for him, in most of America, we still let black and brown people vote.
![]()
So, that's a thing...
For that big of a turnout, you'd expect a Trump landslide. Can't ignore that people might be coming out to make sure he doesn't win.
Both the Republicans and the Democrats seem to be facing major schisms within their party. I suppose the issue is largely about how many pro-establishment or anti-establishment voters will turn out to vote for their party's nominee. Will Christian evangelicals that love Cruz end up voting for Trump? Will socialist Sanders fans put aside their ideals to vote for Hilary? Exactly how bitter and spiteful will members of these groups be when their chosen candidate doesn't win?
I'm a Sanders supporter, my general belief is that Sanders can repel Trumps BS, since Sanders next to never flip flops (of course Trump still has his communism rant), Hillary is just doomed against Trump.
My plan is to not vote in the general election if it comes down to HvT, as I do not believe Hillary has a snowballs chance in hell against a pig like Trump, and I refuse to support either side. I do not believe Hillary is a progressive and I do not like the idea of that orange chicken shit being embedded in American history as someone my children would need to memorize in their history class (Trump),I also do not like the idea of white supremacists coming out of their holes in the dirt acting like everything will be ok for them.
However, my opinion may change as time gets closer and may vote.
I am a little late to the party on this.
By not voting you are actually making this more likely to happen. You may think not voting will keep you hands clean but you are doing Trump's handy work.
Why are they idiots? Their vote wouldn't have changed that result.I agree with you. It is so idiotic to take this stance. Here is how I always picture it going for those who sit out.
Step 1: "Oh I just won't vote if my favored canidate doesn't get the nom...doot doot."
Step 2: "Oh shit! That asshole won?!?! Who the fuck would vote for them? Bunch of morons!"
Idiots.
Why are they idiots? Their vote wouldn't have changed that result.
But won't you be doing that in the general?Because I find the idea of voting only for your one candidate to be an absolute shit mindset.
But won't you be doing that in the general?
But you'll only be voting for your one general election candidate.If Bernie doesn't get the nom, I am most definitely voting for another candidate.
Why are they idiots? Their vote wouldn't have changed that result.
I'm terribly afraid that he does. There's just this really thick feeling in the air that scares the shit out of me. Like I'm watching the rise of fucking Hitler or something.