I don't mind the Havok speech but the way it was presented kind of makes it seem more cowardly than progressive. I guess it depends on the person reading it.
Just because he addresses Mutant-Human relations peacefully doesn't make it cowardly. He could have done it aggressively like Cyclops but that would have defeated the purpose of him proposing peace.
It's like Havok took on the role of Professor X, while Cyclops is steadily becoming Magneto.
Just because he addresses Mutant-Human relations peacefully doesn't make it cowardly. He could have done it aggressively like Cyclops but that would have defeated the purpose of him proposing peace.
It's like Havok took on the role of Professor X, while Cyclops is steadily becoming Magneto.
Yeah. But the equation is completly wrong. Religion and religious persecution is in no way compareable to idea of resenting someone because of his or her physiology.
There are parallels, both are huge issues and should not happen, but they analogy does not work. I find both the statements of Pryde and Alex interesting, but probematic. Interestingly for me the Summers brothers are not different from each other. Scott is fighting for equality too, he too will protect mankind, but he sees it as his duty to do more for a minority without the power to help itself.
For example, here was an average mutant in the 2000s. His name is Beak.
Beak's mutant powers? He's a human-chicken. Could glide a little, had hollow bones, tougher muscle to a degree, but in the end an average human of standard training could still beat him up rather easily.
In the 90's when comic books were all the rage I never cared for X-Men. Or any other super hero outside of Iron Man/War Machine. I read an issue of X-men since all my friends were into it, tried Spider Man and the like but they were never interesting to me.