Yeah and tbh I don’t need professional reviews either. I can watch a gameplay video and quickly see if a game is for me or not. When I’m not quite sure I wishlist and buy cheap later.Personally I put zero stock in metacritic reviews. No accountability whatsoever on whether any of the people leaving a "review" actually played the game.
Metacritic is worthless crap from both the "professional" and user angle.
Why people still put any stock in that relic is beyond me. The fact that publishers still seem to care about it is equally confusing.
What you inferred isn't what he said. Your outrage is your own fault. You decided that he means anyone who doesn't like it. Even without any further context for the tweet it makes more sense that he's talking about a specific subset of people, most likely review bombers or people who only focus on the Taash shit.Holy shit at Schrier on Twitter
'i dont actually like the game but I like seeing you chuds owned'
Holy shit, so if you dont like this game your a chud?
Whats wrong with these people?
Metacritic is worthless crap from both the "professional" and user angle.
Why people still put any stock in that relic is beyond me. The fact that publishers still seem to care about it is equally confusing.
If you actually look at my pullet points you will see that the negative points are primarily related to dialogue and characters. I do not need to press any buttons to see that, watching several hour long Playthroughs conveys that quite well.‘Seen’? Not even played?
My word
Yeah and tbh I don’t need professional reviews either. I can watch a gameplay video and quickly see if a game is for me or not. When I’m not quite sure I wishlist and buy cheap later.
And on Steam you can filter out low playtime. Go with 5 hours or more. Then filter so you only see the negative reviews and go through the top 10-20 reviews and see if the complaints are something you actually care about.
Its one of the best games I've played this year.
Imagine being a kid at Christmas, You're trying to sleep on Christmas eve, the tension of opening a great game such as Elden ring, or your parents buying you Baldurs 3
Morning comes, you rush downstairs, and it's this pile of shit
You know this will happen somewhere
In that case he can call me Bigot Smalls.Greg Miller says if you don't like this game because of the forced woke it's because you're a bigot.
Mostly positive Steam
Mid 80’s PSN
Mid 80’s XBL
Mid 80’s meta
The pearl clutching mob took an L on this one. At least they still killed Concord.
They'll be pulling Barvs all through boxing dayBe like "WOW Morine, he doesn't fucking want a old game, kidz theses days want the latest and greatest, this game JUST came out, he will love it and say its phat, with a PH Morine"
Like...why would Eurogamer give a 5/5 if it wasn't the tits Morine? Be FOR REAL! lol
Dragon Age: The Veilguard review - the best BioWare game I've ever played
A fantasy role-playing game of astonishing spectacle. This is the best Dragon Age, and perhaps BioWare, has ever been. Eurogamer's review.www.eurogamer.net
the deep lolz, I didn't know they really gave this a perfect score, to say this is the BEST bioware game, not even Dragon Age, BEST Bioware game is a wild claim
Glad I read your post as I was thinking about replying, but that’s good advice… I’ve still only played the Dragon Age intro because I need to finish up a couple of other things first (Outlaws and COD campaign), but I can already tell I’m going to enjoy it.Edit: not even worth putting the bigots on blast.
This is the least surprising news of the week.
Greg Miller moans when he wipes.Greg Miller says if you don't like this game because of the forced woke it's because you're a bigot.
eurogamer really gave this 5/5? At least i know to no longer take any of their reviews seriously.There are polarized views among professional reviewers as well, even within the same networks.
Eurogamer Poland 7/10.
Eurogamer UK 5/5.
IGN Brasil 7.5/10.
IGN US 9/10.
And the lowest I’ve seen, FZ Sweden 2/5.
If the story is so intentionally bad that the game itself is unplayable, a 0/10 is actually descriptive. It’s only a needed score in exceedingly rare situations like this one. The dialog is so bad that it cancels out the rest of the game. It cannot be played.I think the game looks like hot shit, as in the act of pressing buttons results in boredom... let alone the terrible writing and self insterts.
But I can also see this is just silly review bombing when majority of the reviews are 0/10
none of what is in the game was hidden before launch, if a bunch of turkeys bought the game and then felt it was a 0 then i gotta say they deserve it.
This sort of play is just ammunition for the kotakus and doesn't reach the developers/publishers, men in suits.
You can even tell the cultural point curves based on region.There are polarized views among professional reviewers as well, even within the same networks.
Eurogamer Poland 7/10.
Eurogamer UK 5/5.
IGN Brasil 7.5/10.
IGN US 9/10.
And the lowest I’ve seen, FZ Sweden 2/5.
0/10 means bottom of the barrel in all ways. A story you don't like does not make all gameplay, visuals, and audio bad, that's just being overly dramatic. No one cares about the opinion of someone being that dramatic.If the story is so intentionally bad that the game itself is unplayable, a 0/10 is actually descriptive. It’s only a needed score in exceedingly rare situations like this one. The dialog is so bad that it cancels out the rest of the game. It cannot be played.
I'm fairly certain 9/10 of the 'total trash dumpster fire, unplayable woke shit' crowd haven't played a second of it.
I think the worst this could fairly get is a 7/10, its' so polished, lore/world building is mint, it's simplistic made for total gimp brains though: but tbh, I'm here for that at the moment, it's my drop in, drop out popcorn game - Rogue Trader and Metaphor on Steamdeck use up all my frontal lobe capacity.
They refused to review Hogwarts Legacy, so yeah.eurogamer really gave this 5/5? At least i know to no longer take any of their reviews seriously.
Yeah even without counting all the nasty stuff in it, from the videos I've seen. The writing is absolutely horrible and bad. And it's not even the so bad that it's good type from most of the B movies of the 80s and 90s that does turned out to be pretty entertaining at the end. But for this game it's just bad bad.Regardless of all the drama surrounding this game...the writing is embarrassingly bad from what I've seen of it.
It sounds like it was written by a 6th grader.
I think 30 hours is the Apex of RPG length tbh - Mass Effect 2 with all DLC and mad exploring clocks in around 30 hours total: perfection.From what I’m seeing if they cut 15-20 hours of filler and repetitive fluff from the 50 hr play time it would be a very solid 30 hour game
Could be that there are no politically driven bonus points in some regions. If the writing is bad there it’ll lower the scores no matter how much it speaks to a modern audience.You can even tell the cultural point curves based on region.
It works both ways. There are clowns leaving 10s. Review bombing isn't really effective.I'm struggling to think of anything more pathetic than leaving a review for a game you've never played, just to annoy people on the other side of a fucking stupid political argument than you.