The game would break with 4 human players i think, enemies are not that smart\fast\hard imo.
No games have quests that accumulate in your journal if you don't actually reach a place and accept them from an npc or mission board, even the most dog piled open worlds like horizon or ac.
Maybe on hard mode where enemies oneshot you even after 15 hours, but for normal mode coop would be too easy.
No games have quests that accumulate in your journal if you don't actually reach a place and accept them from an npc or mission board, even the most dog piled open worlds like horizon or ac.
Not sure what open world games you people play tbh
What? no idea what are you trying to say, maybe i forgot how latest ac works
That's a pretty shitty attitude, do you also want "get a console" replies every time you get an unoptimised port with stuttering? 90%+ of console releases have had 60fps modes these past 3 years, nothing wrong with people wanting or expecting that. It's not like the games has RT or visuals that set the world on fire.
Get a PC. You get what you pay for.
The only thing i can think of, is that they have a very robust ia\physics system and interaction for npcs\monsters etc. that really suck a lot of resources from the cpu.
No, it's all boring by the numbers shit, i haven't been invested in the writing of this game at all.
I'd say in gta6's case we can rule out 60fps (at least on the base machines) because of the RTGI solution. It's hard to say anything about CPU bottlenecks without benchmarks. I remember people also saying that plague tale requiem couldn't be 60fps on consoles because of the cpu and rats, but it got patched anyway and ran great.
That's still pretty small.
Pretty sure that handling all those npcs with physics, ia and shit is even more heavy than any light system solution, what we saw is way more advanced than the more advanced open world in the market by a generation basically.
I don't think there always needs to be a specific tech reason why it can't be done. We have cases of games that released at 30 and got patched later because of popular demand, some times it's just not a focus during development. All I'm saying is, let's wait and see instead of people already starting the usual "Well you got a console, don't have any expectations whatsoever or get a PC" song and dance.
I clear a camp in ac origins and i see that huge piramid close to me and i decide to explore without a quest assigned, the fact that when i get close to the piramid i get an icon in the map change absolute nothing in term of exploration enjoyment or awe inducing factor, the icon doesn't tell me what enemies or loot i'm gonna find inside, same for the other 489589340589340834905 open world game i played, my exploration is always dictated by my curiosity and not because an icon tell me to explore.
Well, to be perfectly fair, that's kinda how it goes.
We can guess tho, and since no other game has the npcs density\variety we saw in the trailer, it's probably safe to say that that is one of the reasons why we don't get 60 fps, not the only one of course.
No, it's not. Unless you are also fine with broken PC ports with stuttering. "Well, that comes with the PC territory, what can ya do" As a customer you should have expectations regardless of where you play your games and developers should always do better, anything else is just the usual condescending forum attitude and the US vs THEM mentality.
Yes it is, and i'm not fine with bad ports but i know how the real world work and that i'm not living in a fable, i never said that it was how it should go, i said that it's how it actually goes.
You claim you have high standards, but then you are also fine with shitty PC ports? That dosn't even make sense my man. Nobody expects a console to compete with a 2k PC, if you have one of those then you're probably looking at native 4k or 120fps. The car analogy is also off. Nobody expects the sun and all the stars in the sky, a 60fps mode is not an unrealistic expectation when 90% of games have had a 60fps mode. It's basically standard on consoles at this point.
I edited my post multiple times because i realized that being fine with numeros wink wink was too subtle for some people to understand....
I disagree. There have been many shitty ports on both console and PC that have been fixed because people complained. Acknowledging and discussing issues is the first step towards getting them resolved.
We are in a forum so discussing this stuff is ok, i just don't think it's very useful because like i said, bad performance in gaming is a thing since forever, like really forever.
You can disengage.
Thats really cool they allow it but theres gotta be some sweet spot between 2-20mins.
But why the empathy emoticon reaction tho
I used the eye as "I hear ya" sometimes. This time it was in reference that they allow you to fight outside your level which is always the right design choose for these games.But why the empathy emoticon reaction tho
You decide how long the battle is based on skill and equipment, they are not 20 min fixed, and knowing how ign dudes play games it's probably half the time if you have at least one hand without severe cramps (light cramps are ok).
Finding pyramids in AC Origins is absolutely highlight of the game and is worth exploring immediately when you get close. They dont put many more such situations though.
It's among the WORST in the entire genre. Bland, unengaging, unchallenging and diluted by the randomization/level scaling that made pretty much any achievement in the game fundamentally pointless.
Well, it was.
Just to be clear, I'm not a hater. I want this game to be great, and I want it to sell 8 million copies.
Latest 2 or 3 ac games have a mode where you can disable indications and make exploration more organic, it doesn't become elden ring all of a sudden but many people are unaware of this.
It's not the consoles my man. There are plenty of gorgeous open world games running at 60FPS.
Sound like a casual…The Gryphon is a boss-type enemy,high level. It taking 20 mins to kill has nothing to do with pacing and everything to do with that players choices. They chose to travel through the open area which the Gryphon hunts in, they chose to camp, and chose to fight etc etc….Also worth noting if this game has the same level of interaction as the first,chances are you could have just thrown a Goblin to feed the Gryphon,or set it on fire to make it flee, likely this game will have more ways to interact…
Different folks have different presences in games. Things you find interesting others do not. So don’t make these generalizations.
Theres people that say that DmC reboot has better gameplay than dmc3/4...
Oh I agree 100%. Skyrim is by far the worst. You need to install a bunch of mods to liven things up and turn it into a more fun game instead of a slog where you just follow the blinking arrow at the top of the screen.
He used the those games as examples when discussing exploration, not fast travel.
People in here also use those games as examples because they are games that have good exploration and the point of was that fast travel doesn't really ruin exploration so it is all related.
You'd love Blackpool.
