Mr Moose
Member
Look at Elden Ring, runs like dog shit and is 96.I like how the game has a 91 on metacritic and gaf is just talking about PC performance lmao
Look at Elden Ring, runs like dog shit and is 96.I like how the game has a 91 on metacritic and gaf is just talking about PC performance lmao
It's pathetic, I'm genuinely convinced PC players don't actually play games they just get them for benchmarks to stroke their tiny dick egos that their 5000$ rig can run a game at 400fps but I guess they have to do something with their time in these threads now that most console games come to PC and they don't have to beg for them at every turn like they used to.
Bitching seems to be the PC master race creed
Some guy in here was even complaining that the reviews are unfair to give the game a 9/10 because the game is unplayable and broken...lmao he's probably complaining about real life being a slideshow after doing a 120fps playthrough of the Nvidia benchmark.
Its fucking 30 fps people... we've lived with it for generations, it's not crashing your PC for goodness sake.
I don't remember it being such a CPU bound game, more like very GPU heavy. At the time I was playing on a GTX 980 and it was an abysmal experience. What this whole situation reminds of is Baldur's Gate 3s third act and Dying Light performance issues at launch related to insane LOD and view distance, which were extremely heavy on the CPU.This reminds me of 2014's Dragon Age Inquisition. A touted release that years later nobody cares about.
Pc bros can turn down settings to reach 60 frames, consoles bros can only play the bullet time version without any option.
Absolutely lovely to see, yes.
Enjoy your N64 textures then.Pc bros can turn down settings to reach 60 frames, consoles bros can only play the bullet time version without any option.
Absolutely lovely to see, yes.
I like how the game has a 91 on metacritic and gaf is just talking about PC performance lmao
I had lasik operation 20 years ago, my sight is 13\10 (or 23\20 for americans)30 frames a day keeps the opticians away
There's no shortage of open world games that let you cut out travel using menus. DD does something different and tries to make travel meaningful.
Game ain't for you, go play something else
Cry harder.Enjoy your N64 textures then.
Did he enjoyed the n64 textures tho?so an italian reviewer said that with a mid/high range build they managed to get 60 fps everytime in combat and open world, the only poblem is the human capital city, even the beastren capital city runs fine
I’m sitting happy baby. 30 fps is more than fine for me. Enjoying the show of PC gamers losing their minds.Cry harder.
Enjoy your N64 textures then.
Commenting on dogshit performance in an enthusiast forum is not crying, just stating facts.I’m sitting happy baby. 30 fps is more than fine for me. Enjoying the show of PC gamers losing their minds.
That looks like upscaling is entirely broken
Something is off with those upscaling numbers I think. Also, max settings? Best thing to do would be to tweak settings and find a good sweet spot. Max settings is not really realistic for the majority of players, better off doing more broad tests as there could be something in the settings that just fucks the framerate.
Hoping there are some optimised drivers this week too.
Did he enjoyed the n64 textures tho?
Do we even know if there is a day one patch? Did they announced it?Gamespot included that in one of the only 2 bullet points for "The Bad" part. "Optimization is poor on PC"
Who knows...maybe that day one patch does some work
Upscaling works fine, game is just so CPU limited that changing resolution won't change performance at all.
And I’ll be here to enjoy the show.Commenting on dogshit performance in an enthusiast forum is not crying, just stating facts.
I'm sure that my 4080\13600k are gonna be A-ok.
is there a digital foundry yet?
I guess PC is the clear stand out winner. Are the consoles as bad as they looked?
Sure you can even play Bloodborne on your PC at much higher frameratesPc bros can turn down settings to reach 60 frames, consoles bros can only play the bullet time version without any option.
Absolutely lovely to see, yes.
But resolution does affect performance.....
Edit: Not so much in cities though. That seems to be where CPU is most demanding.
All I see are PlayStation fans celebrating because the PS5 version is less inferior than they were expecting. Congrats, I guess!
You got console gamers talking about the PC version more than they are the console version here
Okay I will just come out and admit it: i was wrong. i figured it was going to be horrible with ray tracing, and it kinda is true for consoles but pc seems to be a different beastThese results are fucking abysmal, drops to 19FPS on 5600X?
This game is officially the worst PC version of the last decade, I don't think we ever had game this much CPU limited.
A dev obviously fucked up and released half broken code with shit performance on all platforms and you guys have nothing better to do than make this about which platform has a slightly less shitty version than the other instead of kicking Capcom in the nuts.....I’m sitting happy baby. 30 fps is more than fine for me. Enjoying the show of PC gamers losing their minds.
People shit on 30fps and they forgot they played all their fav games at that framerate just fine.Sure you can even play Bloodborne on your PC at much higher framerates
Here's the PS4 version at 30 fps
Here's the PC master race version with settings dialed down to run at masterful 120fps.
I'd rather play the PS4 bullet time version thanks
Okay I will just come out and admit it: i was wrong. i figured it was going to be horrible with ray tracing, and it kinda is true for consoles but pc seems to be a different beast
Sure you can even play Bloodborne on your PC at much higher framerates
Here's the PS4 version at 30 fps
Here's the PC master race version with settings dialed down to run at masterful 120fps.
I'd rather play the PS4 bullet time version thanks
Nice of you to share a pic of your PC bros after a session of benchmarking.
These results are fucking abysmal, drops to 19FPS on 5600X?
This game is officially the worst PC version of the last decade, I don't think we ever had game this much CPU limited.
All I see are PlayStation fans celebrating because the PS5 version is less inferior than they were expecting. Congrats, I guess!
Don't be crazy.If my 4070 runs it at 30fps with lows in the 20s, might as well just grab the ps5 version. I don't even have that great of a cpu.
Take this PoS out of here. Guy used to blatantly steal the script of smaller channels for his videos. But I won't derail the thread for this more than am already doing.
Was this your gatcha moment? I have all the consoles to play console exclusives, but nice try.Sure you can even play Bloodborne on your PC at much higher framerates
Here's the PS4 version at 30 fps
Here's the PC master race version with settings dialed down to run at masterful 120fps.
I'd rather play the PS4 bullet time version thanks
Buggy Loop shared a pic of your session with your bros after benchmarking GaiffWas about to agree thinking you were talking about FeralEcho