You were?
Still worse than vodafone in italy.wind status?
Wrong. PC CPUs have the capacity to hit 100fps+ in the open world. Consoles are struggling to hit a roody poo 40fps there. Not even the Pro console will fix that. This game needs mega beefy CPUs to run smoothly, which will be a reality in a couple years. The advanced AI calculations are a little ahead of its time. The first truly next gen game.I think my boy Kacho was laughing with me because I was right!
Take it up with capcom. i didnt make the game lolSo 20 npcs attacking a dragon is what make the game run like a turd all the time?
Doesn't dying light 2 not only looks better but also has way more than 20 models on screen at any given time fighting each other and shit?
What about the largest battles in horizon between dinobots and npcs? Pretty sure you get close to 20 models on screens, pretty sure that a lot of games have 20+ models on screen without going into the 20s.
Sorry, i'm not impressed.
You think i was mad at you?Take it up with capcom. i didnt make the game lol
PC CPUs have the capacity to hit 100fps+
He for sure is CPU bound even on open areas. DLSS cant be this broken.there could be CPU bound settings. I don't like the "max" settings term I'm seeing there
But framerate *is* gameplay.Spot on- im here to talk and read about the gameplay and reviews. Fuck all this other shit.
Maybe someone so go make a thread about framerates
Is there anyone you're not fighting on this board?Peak perf is irrelevant if it’s not sustained, which it’s not.
Wouldn’t expect a neckbeard to really understand this concept well tho, so I forgive u
Peak perf might be relevant when you are hitting it 90% of the time, which (according to that Eurogamer reveiw) is anytime you are not in a city, even if fighting against a big monster and aided by multiple NPCs.Peak perf is irrelevant if it’s not sustained, which it’s not.
Well 1) maybe it’s because console fanboys don’t go into every discussion trying to act superiorI love how the console fanboys ignore that the game runs even worse on consoles...
Let’s wait and see how much Capcom can improve things on PC before NASA tier CPUs hit the consumer market.Peak perf is irrelevant if it’s not sustained, which it’s not.
Wouldn’t expect a neckbeard to really understand this concept well tho, so I forgive u
Game Journalists know who butters their bread.I’m not sure how we keep getting great scores that across the board run like complete shit to the point of being unplayable in some cases.
Yeah? Game is what we expected, poorly optimized
Don't they say there was no frame drops on that scene?So 20 npcs attacking a dragon is what make the game run like a turd all the time?
Doesn't dying light 2 not only looks better but also has way more than 20 models on screen at any given time fighting each other and shit?
What about the largest battles in horizon between dinobots and npcs? Pretty sure you get close to 20 models on screens, pretty sure that a lot of games have 20+ models on screen without going into the 20s.
Sorry, i'm not impressed.
Peak perf is irrelevant if it’s not sustained, which it’s not.
Wouldn’t expect a neckbeard to really understand this concept well tho, so I forgive u
That’s my boy. We went to high school together. Don’t take it seriously.Is there anyone you're not fighting on this board?
Game Journalists know who butters their bread.
There’s simply no chance of any mainline Sony, Nintendo, Capcom or From game getting fairly judged. Fortunately, the games are typically great, but they are the titles that make the whole industry exist.
Don’t bite the hand that feeds.
Is there anyone you're not fighting on this board?
Except that higher powered PCs are going to have better performance. So saying "Ass is Ass, my friend. And it will always be Ass. You can't brute force your way out of it" isnt' really you being right at all.
isnt' really you being right at all.
That is always the case, tell me something new.
Dude is angry at PC gamers, maybe one fucked his wife or somethingIs there anyone you're not fighting on this board?
So saying "Ass is Ass, my friend. And it will always be Ass.
It's always the guy who can't spell somehow.Is there anyone you're not fighting on this board?
So 20 npcs attacking a dragon is what make the game run like a turd all the time?
Doesn't dying light 2 not only looks better but also has way more than 20 models on screen at any given time fighting each other and shit?
What about the largest battles in horizon between dinobots and npcs? Pretty sure you get close to 20 models on screens, pretty sure that a lot of games have 20+ models on screen without going into the 20s.
Sorry, i'm not impressed.
I'm just going to leave it there.
The only thing I was wrong about is the game’s quality, apparently it is good.
But the performance across everything? Not great. Don’t know how that’s questionable at all
Most people when they see 90+ metacritic:Other people: arguing about stuff
Gigachad me: opening the thread, looking at scores, sees 91 and walks away satisfied
Comparing CapGods to Dying Light and Horizon....
You spend more time dicking around with settings than playing the actual game, but let their OCD consume them and their time.This game is an example of why I had to stop PC gaming. The chase for performance/visuals just got too much. Being a console peasant is a much easier and more enjoyable experience for me.
Also, sorry, i'm not a capcom nut hugger and dying light 1 was a better zombie game than all the latest re games combined.
Does he understand that the limit isn’t the CPU, but the software engineers writing some horribly inefficient code?
Why do you keep having to make such obvious statements, cmon gaf give your head a shake!Both of those statements can be true at the same time.
Both can be true.Does he understand that the limit isn’t the CPU, but the software engineers writing some horribly inefficient code?
This guy’s takes are so clueless
Both of those statements can be true at the same time.