-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Early 'The Mummy' reviews, "Dark Universe is dead on arrival"
- Thread starter LordOfLore
- Start date
Jeffolation
Banned
Aww, I was looking forward to some monster mashing. I must have missed or had forgotten that Alex Kurtzman was directing this though, expectations tempered further.
Best Mummy movie is still the Karloff film.
Best Mummy movie is still the Karloff film.
buttery fistful
Member
I'm aware my nostalgia might alter how I see certain things but I've watched The Mummy since adulthood and it's still entertaining
morningbus
Serious Sam is a wicked gahbidge series for chowdaheads.
The real appeal of these universes is to the studio heads, who realized that a "cinematic universe" allows them to sell sequels that aren't sequels.
The hardcore obsessive knows the difference between these things, even down to how Deadpool isn't actually a Marvel movie like how Dr. Stranger is a Marvel movie, but the average movie-goer mostly can't tell the difference.
I saw Batman v. Superman with a group of friends, explained to them the difference between Marvel and DC, and still had to field questions about whether Spiderman could be in it. These people aren't dumb: they just don't care about it.
The biggest effect it has is that you can generally build marketing off the back of the previous project. Marvel can advertise that they're the studio that brought you Iron-Man when selling you Ant-Man. DC, for example, didn't really say, "You loved her in Batman v. Superman, a movie you probably didn't like, now see her again!" because, you know, that's pretty weak. It didn't stop Wonder Woman being advertised as its own movie and doing really well on its own, like most movies not set in interconnected universes.
Inferno313
Banned
Eh. I think that "halo effect" is something that needs to be built up. If you feel it pretty strongly for Marvel films, that's because that franchise has had almost a decade to get to this point.
Pre-Avengers, I would argue that that effect didn't really exist at all outside of pre-established Marvel fans. I certainly didn't feel compelled to see Thor or The Incredible Hulk because of Iron Man or Captain America. I did go back and check them out later because of The Avengers though.
The first had sme genuinely creepy moments, especially in the first half.
The thing with the Godzilla/King Kong stuff is it has already worked for decades with how much cross-pollination Toho did with their movies, and we already have a proven "kaiju Wrestlemania" in Destroy All Monsters, but the danger there is that Toho never really fussed over having those team-ups make much sense beyond saving a few bucks by reusing costumes and props.
More_Badass
Member
The original was 1930s classic horror in the vein of Dracula
Fraiser's films were action-adventure/comedy loose remakes
brianjones
Member
Yup.. I rolled my eyes when I saw how "dark and gritty" this new one was
squallheart
Member
This. Enjoyed the first one and when they added the kid I'm like why? I'm still going to see this film. It would of been awesome if cruise turned into the mummy and Fraser has an extra cut scene being recruited. XD.
Lord Panda
The Sea is Always Right
Kurtzmann ... guy keeps getting gigs despite the crap he produces
BocoDragon
or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Realize This Assgrab is Delicious
Ironically, I remember rolling my eyes that they turned a classic horror franchise into a comedic adventure movie back in 1999.
Movie turned out alright, though.
Fuck no, I watched the first Fraser Mummy as an adult and really enjoyed it. Didn't see the second. Walked out midway through the movie for the third.
I rewatched Space Jam as an adult and it definitely wasn't as good as I remembered but still entertaining. And the theme song is still primo.
I still want to see this but my expectations of always been low, and this whole universe thing is the new version of everything has to be a trilogy. More often than not does ambitious cart before the horse plans mean the individual movie suffers in some form.
Still, I'm crushing on Sofia Boutella and find her very charismatic and entertaining to watch in my opinion, so besides the Cruise Missile I'd see it for her anyway.
Still, I'm crushing on Sofia Boutella and find her very charismatic and entertaining to watch in my opinion, so besides the Cruise Missile I'd see it for her anyway.
Transformers was atleast nuts. Mummy looked like been here, done that.
Demoncarnotaur
Member
I expected more apathy, and less scathing, but that said.... I'm not surprised.
broncobuster
Banned
I'm not sure I understand the sense in giving Kurtzman this big blockbuster. But maybe it scares Fox away from letting Kinberg direct X-Men. Heck, wasn't Orci lined up to direct Star Trek Beyond at a point?
Hollywood never fucking learns with this shit.
Razgriz-Specter
Member
Its a pure adventure film with a "unique" setting and action,
even at the worst levels it works in a niche way like Pirates of the Caribbean.
Thats why the modern setting worried me so much about this.
I'd argue Crystal Skull in there as well but it is harder to derive default enjoyment from just because it so heavily shits on the incredible franchise.
Triggerhappytel
Member
If this is enough of a bomb I can see the whole lot being cancelled. Provided production on nothing else has been started it's probably not too late.
This is already the third attempt. Wolfman > Dracula Untold > The Mummy
Yes, I believe that was always the plan. It's a big part of the reason why Disney bought them. Although the universe building in Iron Man was minor enough that had it been a bomb and the others got cancelled I don't think anyone would have really cared.
Rapscallion
Member
To be fair, the originals aren't exactly classics. They at least had some semblance of fun and humor...This movie looks void of both.
Bring back Brendon Fraser.
Bring back Brendon Fraser.
Razgriz-Specter
Member
morningbus
Serious Sam is a wicked gahbidge series for chowdaheads.
Rapscallion
Member
My mistake, I was referring to the Fraser vehicles of the 90s and 00s. I think it's safe to say that this film has more in common with those than the original universal flicks.
Grizzlyjin
Supersonic, idiotic, disconnecting, not respecting, who would really ever wanna go and top that
Razgriz-Specter
Member
Fuck it, let's make the '99 Mummy film a classic, yeah?
Yeah?
It already is
Eppy Thatcher
God's had his chance.
I had kind of convinced my brain that this movie was going to pull a tricky dick on me and halfway through the flick make Tom the bad guy and I was gonna be super happy about it...
sucks that this sucks. But that first trailer/teaser that released without Fx audio was like a bad omen... maybe... you could say... a curse.
sucks that this sucks. But that first trailer/teaser that released without Fx audio was like a bad omen... maybe... you could say... a curse.
Not even slightly surprised. Taking a concept like a Mummy, which is kind of campy by contemporary standards, and making it (seemingly) a serious monster action movie was just a very poor decision.
The Brendan Fraser movies got it right by not taking themselves too seriously.
Maybe they'll get it right when they remake The Mummy again in another 20 years.
The Brendan Fraser movies got it right by not taking themselves too seriously.
Maybe they'll get it right when they remake The Mummy again in another 20 years.
The Mummy (first Frasier vehicle) was awesome though! Like the Guardians of the Galaxy of monster movies, at the time.
If the reviews are anything go by, the mummy gets barely anything to do. So it doesn't seem like much of a monster movie.
Jack Scofield
Member
Seriously. The Mummy with Brendan Frasier is a really fun film.
ForsakenLotus
Member
I just got back from Universals Studios a few days ago and The Mummy ride got me excited to see the movie despite low expectations. I'm finally going to go see Wonder Woman Friday and I was planning on seeing The Mummy as well, but now I don't know.
Sgt. Kabukiman
Banned
That's my main hope, honestly.
Rapscallion
Member
I think it's okay; closer to National Treasure than Raiders of The Lost Ark in terms of quality.
What's the difference between THE Mummy and A Mummy? What defines The Mummy that's shared between the old classics, the Fraser series, and this new one? Like if Warner Bros wanted to make a movie about a mummy monster what would they have to stay away from to not encroach on THE Mummy?
michaelius
Banned
Why not? They were cheesy comedies with nice humor similar in spirit of Indiana Jones.