Cosmonaut X
Member
Aaron Strife said:He's such a fucking douchefaggot.
Uhhh...
Aaron Strife said:He's such a fucking douchefaggot.
Reminds me of an aged version of the Matthew Goode, the guy that played Ozymandias in the Watchmen movie -AzureNightmareXE said:is it just me or does he look like an evil mastermind?
Yasae said:You cannot prevent trademark filings of the same name or symbol, etc. in different industries. That's against the law.
He has no global trademark on anything.
Yeah, this is kind of the issue. Langdell is definitely taking advantage of trademark law to the maximum, but shitheads like him are symptoms, not the cause, of the real problem. US trademark, patent, copyright, fuck, the entire goddam legal system needs a re-write.BluWacky said:So it is. But note the numerous classes he has his trademarks registered in - things like comic books, mugs, etc. He can only contest registrations in those classes, which Mobigame's EDGE, Mirror's Edge etc. all fall into - of course he's got the computer games class registered.
Langdell's defence of his trademark is perfectly legal - indeed, if he didn't protect it he'd lose it under US law. The reasons why everyone was butthurt at first were:
i) No-one's ever heard of him and he hasn't released a game in years
ii) He was sticking it to an indie developer with a genuinely decent game
What he did was perfectly within his rights as the holder of the EDGE trademark in relation to games. Of course, it's turned out that his registrations are based on fabricated evidence, that he's a vexatious litigant and just downright unpleasant to deal with - but if he'd been legit he'd have been acting in the appropriate way.
I don't think anyone's disputed that. But he does hold the EDGE trademark in a variety of classes in the US and I THINK the Community (Europe), hence why he is able to contest these various registrations.
Sounds like EA was lazy.BluWacky said:So it is. But note the numerous classes he has his trademarks registered in - things like comic books, mugs, etc. He can only contest registrations in those classes, which Mobigame's EDGE, Mirror's Edge etc. all fall into - of course he's got the computer games class registered.
Langdell's defence of his trademark is perfectly legal - indeed, if he didn't protect it he'd lose it under US law. The reasons why everyone was butthurt at first were:
i) No-one's ever heard of him and he hasn't released a game in years
ii) He was sticking it to an indie developer with a genuinely decent game
What he did was perfectly within his rights as the holder of the EDGE trademark in relation to games. Of course, it's turned out that his registrations are based on fabricated evidence, that he's a vexatious litigant and just downright unpleasant to deal with - but if he'd been legit he'd have been acting in the appropriate way.
Who would have thought thatAniHawk said:Probably my favorite thing this gen has been EA's turnaround.
Segata Sanshiro said:The whole situation with all of this tomfoolery reminds me of the Batman comic, "Joker Fish", where Joker gives fish a toxin to make them look like him and thus wants royalties on all fish sold. The hinge of the story was how ridiculous it was for someone to try and patent something like fish.
As odd as it sounds I was thinking the exact same thing. Yahtzee!Monroeski said:Reminds me of an aged version of the Matthew Goode, the guy that played Ozymandias in the Watchmen movie -
Evil mastermind, indeed!
What does this mean?Yasae said:Mark Drawing Code (4) STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
Serial Number 77222986
Filing Date July 5, 2007
Current Filing Basis 1B
Original Filing Basis 1B
Published for Opposition January 15, 2008
Owner (APPLICANT) Electronic Arts Inc. CORPORATION DELAWARE 209 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood City CALIFORNIA 94065
Type of Mark TRADEMARK. SERVICE MARK
Register PRINCIPAL
Live/Dead Indicator DEAD
Abandonment Date September 8, 2009
Cosmo Clock 21 said:What does this mean?
lochnesssnowman said:This site is a pretty good log of his activities: http://chaosedge.wordpress.com/
But this is exactly the point. If an apostrophe is enough for Langdell to get away, then the basis for most of his threats is nullified.OgTheClever said:Mirror's Edge requires an apostrophe. Edge's 'Mirrors' appears to be referring to the plural of Mirror. That looks like plenty of difference to me even though this is all just bullshit anyway.
Cosmo Clock 21 said:What does this mean?
Keyser Soze said:From Wikipedia:
As of June 1, 2009, Edge Games applied for a US trademark for the phrase, "Edge of Twilight."[17] This is the name of an upcoming steampunk fantasy game that has been in development by Fuzzyeyes Studios for at least two years.[18][19]
http://tmportal.uspto.gov/external/...e&details=&SELECT=US+Serial+No&TEXT=77748665#
Bastard!
Jax said:what rubbish. You can't trademark a phrase. EA should sue the asshole at somepoint in time. EA is on a role.
charlequin said:
- Copyright is legal protection of creative works. It is automatically granted to all such works at the moment of creation. It lasts the creator's lifetime plus seventy years. It isn't lost if you don't protect it.
Jax said:what rubbish. You can't trademark a phrase. EA should sue the asshole at somepoint in time. EA is on a role.
Jax said:You can't trademark a phrase.
you're firedJax said:what rubbish. You can't trademark a phrase. EA should sue the asshole at somepoint in time. EA is on a role.
At last people will stop pimping cutting edge graphics. About time, really.kaizoku said:so ridiculous.
![]()
Segata Sanshiro said:The whole situation with all of this tomfoolery reminds me of the Batman comic, "Joker Fish", where Joker gives fish a toxin to make them look like him and thus wants royalties on all fish sold. The hinge of the story was how ridiculous it was for someone to try and patent something like fish.
You're gonna love this:grandjedi6 said:My favorite part of this is that Langdell is claiming to have released a game called "Racers" 3 weeks ago. Anyone ever see this alleged game anywhere? :lol
Langdell would just end up using it as evidence that his games existchubigans said:You're gonna love this:
http://chaosedge.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/hedge-your-bets/
:lol :lol :lol
I would LOVE to see IGN put up a mock-review of RACERS with a bad score to see what would happen. :lol
DeuceMojo said:When I read the snippet about him collecting on trademark settlements, I thought "nothing new in the US, same old schtick: making a living off of lawsuits."
Then I read about his other stuff -- stiffing people after services rendered, refusing to pay wages, etc. etc. and that's when I stopped liking him. I have a serious problem with people that don't settle up. If you get rich, you get rich with your partners. If the company goes broke, you go broke along with everyone else. Anyone who plays it any other way is a loser and deserves whatever he gets. Hopefully EA will bankrupt him.
chubigans said:You're gonna love this:
http://chaosedge.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/hedge-your-bets/
:lol :lol :lol
I would LOVE to see IGN put up a mock-review of RACERS with a bad score to see what would happen. :lol
Ok, that shit is hilarious. The store, the order numbers, the "sell out" all gold.chubigans said:You're gonna love this:
http://chaosedge.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/hedge-your-bets/
:lol :lol :lol
I would LOVE to see IGN put up a mock-review of RACERS with a bad score to see what would happen. :lol
kaizoku said:so ridiculous.
![]()
ixix said:More accurately, it lasts the creator's lifetime plus however many years Walt Disney has been dead (with a few extra for wiggle room).
chubigans said:You're gonna love this:
http://chaosedge.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/hedge-your-bets/
:lol :lol :lol
I would LOVE to see IGN put up a mock-review of RACERS with a bad score to see what would happen. :lol
DigitalDevil said:what a DOUCHE
These guys are so awesome.chubigans said:You're gonna love this:
http://chaosedge.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/hedge-your-bets/
:lol :lol :lol
I would LOVE to see IGN put up a mock-review of RACERS with a bad score to see what would happen. :lol
mrkgoo said:You probably can trademark a phrase.
The point of trademark is to prevent other companies from using your trademark in such a way as to gain benefits by misrepresenting yourself in the guise of something else.