EDGE: "Power struggle: the real differences between PS4 and Xbox One performance"

If you want some guys fired for breaking NDAs, sure.
Go ahead and demand EDGE for it.

Or better yet, ask some GAFers who are in-the-know to spill the names.

Don't say stupid things when you know full well why these guys are anonymous.
true.

that said you totally missed his point.
 
If true, this really speaks to all my issues of Microsoft of late. which is telling people what they want, versus listening to them.

Kudos to Sony (and Cerny) for humbling up and listening to what devs and customers wanted.
 
Last-gen the 360 pretty much only supported Dolby Digital output, while multiplatform games on the PS3 had DTS, 5.1 LPCM and 7.1 LPCM support. Nobody gave a shit. :lol Now it's all about the mythical ultra-powerful, does-everything audio processor on the xbone huh? I'll laugh my ass off if Digital Foundry starts bringing that shit up in their next-gen face-offs.
 
I am questuoining Edge's article specifically. Not what we've heard in general. If they say 50% faster in an article they need something concrete to back it up.

I edited in the quotes from anandtech, just for reference. Sony's GPU is significantly more powerful than microsoft's. Sony has an advantage also in that they have much more ram running at higher bandwidths. (i.e. All 8 gigs at 176 GB/s, not just 32 megs.) It's also easier to program, as we've seen from developer comments in this thread and others.

somewhere between 40%-50% more powerful has been concluded by many third party outlets and developer comments, not just edge.
 
Based on nothing but illogical, opinionated, biased grade-a bullshit. Does that bullshit come in honey flavor?
I could say the same about the giant PS4 circlejerk going on around here.

Yeah, I suppose using computers in a server farm to free up (low-end) AI logic from the host hardware is something only Microsoft can do. Guess IBM's never done it, except they have for decades. Guess Google isn't doing it, except they are. Guess Apple can't do it, except they have been. Nope, server tech is patented to Microsoft :rollseyes
Microsoft's implementation is much more focused and designed specifically for gaming applications. It builds off of technology that was originally developed to support Halo 4. The innovation here isn't just the Windows Azure infrastructure (which is only really rivaled by Google's cloud infrastructure), but also in the tools that let developers use it with a minimum of fuss.

And...."software architecture"? You're just jesting at this point, surely...
Actually no. The triple-OS architecture is quite significant; it is what makes Xbox One's multitasking as seamless and fast as it is. We haven't seen anything on PS4 that compares (yet.)

Your "experience" has and always will come down to the games you're playing. You doing this fanboy console trip is doing yourself zero favors and shows how badly you've been damaged by that thinking. If you came out and said XBO is going to be better b/c it has more of the games you want, okay. At least that's an opinion that can be respected. Trying to turn biased opinions into outright facts however is shameless.
Neither PS4 nor Xbox One are merely "games" machines. They are expected to serve as fully-fledged entertainment hubs for several years. From what I've seen, Xbox One is better-designed for that.
 
So some devs are actually going to try and downgrade the ps4 version for "political" reasons. Bullshit.

Not political so much as business-related. Third parties learned long ago that making one half of your most expensive games obviously lesser (in a way that goes way beyond pixel-counting and a sub-15% frame advantage) than another hurts them and their sales as well as the view on that particular franchise or series in the longer term. Not one of these publishers can afford to lose as much a 35-50% of their addressable userbase to some widely-perceived gap in quality when their games are going to struggle to make money on both launching platforms as is. PC sales don't make a dent in the numbers they are dealing in with these major titles and franchise-starting hopefuls. This last gen, there was plenty of talk about titles on both platforms being pulled back to meet in the middle. They cannot afford to send versions of new big stuff to die just to sate the desires of one part of that overall userbase.
 
Based on this and other articles, it seems clear to me that the PS4 will have better graphics than Xbox One going into the next generation. And that’s fine.

But it also seems clear that Xbox One will have better everything else than PS4. Specifically, better audio, better multiplayer, better gameplay, and an all-around better gaming experience.

It will have better audio thanks to a dedicated APU (audio processing unit), better multiplayer and gameplay thanks to cloud-based AI, and an all-around better gaming experience thanks to the software architecture and Kinect.

Sony can have the “better graphics” bragging rights. I’m fine with having a better experience all-around, even if it means slightly inferior graphics.

dat post history
 
I could say the same about the giant PS4 circlejerk going on around here.

Microsoft's implementation is much more focused and designed specifically for gaming applications. It builds off of technology that was originally developed to support Halo 4. The innovation here isn't just the Windows Azure infrastructure (which is only really rivaled by Google's cloud infrastructure), but also in the tools that let developers use it with a minimum of fuss.

Actually no. The triple-OS architecture is quite significant; it is what makes Xbox One's multitasking as seamless and fast as it is. We haven't seen anything on PS4 that compares (yet.)

Neither PS4 nor Xbox One are merely "games" machines. They are expected to serve as fully-fledged entertainment hubs for several years. From what I've seen, Xbox One is better-designed for that.

How does that let the xbone have better gameplay
 
Don't write an article when you don't have one concrete source that I know.

What's wrong with questioning Edge?

Nothing wrong with questioning Edge. But if I were a dev commenting on something like this, the last thing I'd want is my name out there. Would you want a 100 page thread on a comment you made, broken down into incredibly overzealous detail, followed by the mocking, witch-hunting, emailing and sometimes threats that come with any of this these days?
 
I'm just excited that developers such as Naughty Dog, SSM, Sucker Punch, and Guerrilla all now have access to the PS4 specs. Given what they accomplished with the limitations of the PS3 hardware; the potential for the games they make this generation is through the roof, and they are leagues ahead of MS first parties. That's the real difference for me.
 
Except we're not talking that monumental of a power difference, a generational one. It's a difference, but both systems will look "next-gen" whereas Wii U looks on par (maybe a bit better) than current gen.

Woah now, I was just pointing out that it was a similar speech to Reggie's. I wasn't trying to make some kind of comparison between the WiiU's situation and Xbox One. There was no hidden intention behind my comment.
 
Not really concerned about Sony in the hardware stakes, it's the software especially the OS. I hope it's a lot better than PS3's. Only seen glimpses, would like them to do a proper demonstration video
 
Hmm, most accurate? I don't think that's quite true. Also I think you took my point as me going against EDGE in this case, I don't think they are wrong here I was just giving the reason I dislike anonymous sources for big articles like this.

I was just looking through the article about Edge's 'Next Xbox always online and blocks used games' article. I couldn't help noticing that you dismissed it as a rumour, how did that work out again?

I'm still fine with the used games thing, although I don't think it's true. Always online is fine by me too.

Rumor still.

I'd also still buy both as intended.
 
I am questuoining Edge's article specifically. Not what we've heard in general. If they say 50% faster in an article they need something concrete to back it up.
Concrete is in the specs - there is nothing more to showcase in terms of how the architectures differ. Real world performance will tell the complete story but I don't understand why you are asking for clarity to something that cannot be clarified. If you don't understand that the larger number is better in a direct architecture comparison that has more to do with your ability to understand than it does lack of explanation.
 

As I recall, it was all concerning versions of EA, Ubisoft, and Acitivision titles of all kinds. Can't remember if it was major differences in the larger view, but it was about devs talking about dialing down effects that worked much better on one versus the other as well as general IQ issues.
 
"without optimisation for either console"

Of course the console with the greater raw power will do better without optimisation. That's why optimisation exists...

I have no doubt that the PS4 will outperform the Xbox One, the numbers don't lie. I think we need to tone down the hype meter a bit though. I think once developers get a better handle on the ESRAM and overall XB1 architecture, the Xbox One will be the equivalent of the PS4's little brother instead of the 'gimped' little brother that sensational articles lead us to believe.

We'll just have to wait and see though.
 
Last-gen the 360 pretty much only supported Dolby Digital output, while multiplatform games on the PS3 had DTS, 5.1 LPCM and 7.1 LPCM support. Nobody gave a shit. :lol Now it's all about the mythical ultra-powerful, does-everything audio processor on the xbone huh? I'll laugh my ass off if Digital Foundry starts bringing that shit up in their next-gen face-offs.

I dunno about you, but I always appreciated the PS3's audio as compared to Xbox 360. PS3 games and movies sound fuller and richer that Xbox 360 counterparts. Even on my $120 five-year-old HTIB system.

I feel the reverse will likely be true in the next generation (ie. Xbox One will sound better than PS4.)
 
I'm laughing like Ray Liotta right now.

goodfellas-henry-hill-shower-o.gif
 
Oh wow hahaha. Exposed!

UnDunn said:
I'd just like to remind everyone that we do not know what CPU or GPU is in either console. We simply don't. There has been lots of unsourced speculation, and somewhere along the line the speculation somehow became fact.

But neither console manufacturer has actually given any real performance specs. The best we have is Microsoft confirming the clock speeds of their CPU and GPU, and a broad overview of their system architecture from the Hot Chips talk. Beyond that, we know almost nothing. (And no, CBOAT's nonsensical rants don't count as evidence either.)

I think a lot of people are going to be surprised at the performance delta between the two consoles when all is said and done.

from about a week ago. I'm dying. MY SIDES
 
As I recall, it was all concerning versions of EA, Ubisoft, and Acitivision titles of all kinds. Can't remember if it was major differences in the larger view, but it was about devs talking about dialing down effects that worked much better on one versus the other as well as general IQ issues.

Madden, Assassin's Creed and COD games all ran signficantly better on the 360 at various points in time.
 
Hmm, most accurate? I don't think that's quite true. Also I think you took my point as me going against EDGE in this case, I don't think they are wrong here I was just giving the reason I dislike anonymous sources for big articles like this.
Yes, most accurate. I'd even say better than VGleaks.

Never really trusted them to begin with.
I can see why.

I was just looking through the article about Edge's 'Next Xbox always online and blocks used games' article. I couldn't help noticing that you dismissed it as a rumour, how did that work out again?
Oops!
 
Not really concerned about Sony in the hardware stakes, it's the software especially the OS. I hope it's a lot better than PS3's. Only seen glimpses, would like them to do a proper demonstration video

The Gamescom presentation was a proper demonstration video, and very impressive.
 
Neither PS4 nor Xbox One are merely "games" machines. They are expected to serve as fully-fledged entertainment hubs for several years. From what I've seen, Xbox One is better-designed for that.

You expect them to be entertainment hubs. And that's your opinion, it doesn't mean everybody else should have the same as yours.
 
Don't write an article when you don't have one concrete source that I know.

What's wrong with questioning Edge?

Every important piece of investigative journalism ever written was invalid in your eyes, I suppose. Woodward and Bernstein should have just packed it up when Deep Throat didn't want to reveal himself.

What you seem to want is PR, not journalism.
 
suggested that without optimisation for either console, a platform-agnostic development build can run at around 30FPS in 1920×1080 on PS4, but it’ll run at “20-something” FPS in 1600×900 on Xbox One

I don't think anybody actually ships games like that.

Hopefully they will build games for X1 at 1080p and a solid 30 or 60fps. If they decide then to add more to the PS4 version because they can so be it. Porting from PS4 to X1 will probably be more of an issue, but nobody is not going to then not optimise the X1 version.
 
I dunno about you, but I always appreciated the PS3's audio as compared to Xbox 360. PS3 games and movies sound fuller and richer that Xbox 360 counterparts. Even on my $120 five-year-old HTIB system.

I feel the reverse will likely be true in the next generation (ie. Xbox One will sound better than PS4.)

And you are basing this on what ? Developers won't make different sound system if one console has better hardware chip. They will just do the same and they will deliver in various sound outputs like 5.1 7.1

If you are thinking that all Xbone games will have BF3 like sound system in place then you are mistaken.
 
I was just looking through the article about Edge's 'Next Xbox always online and blocks used games' article. I couldn't help noticing that you dismissed it as a rumour, how did that work out again?

You win some you lose some. At the end of the day I can only go based on what information is available. Anonymous sources still bother me. Not sure how that older article changes anything. Also, if you notice, it was said that EDGE is the "most accurate source" which is what I was referring to. Also, was I wrong? No, it was a rumor at the time.

Thanks for doing some digging though, I feel so appreciated!
 
IIRC, something similar was said of the PS3 in it's infancy, developers would throw unoptimized code and while the 360 was already doing pretty good, the PS3 was leagues behind and needed a ton of optimization before getting them to par.

We kind of knew eSram would be a bitch, hopefully it won't be too hard to get up to speed, but the difference in raw power is pretty clear, although not as big as most are expecting, we could be looking at PS4 games at 30fps with 1920 x 1080 vs XBO games also locked at 30fps with the same visual flair but instead running at 1600 x 900. It's better than dumbed down visuals. I bet most people won't even tell the difference unless put under a lens (of truth).

Digital Foundry and Lens of Truth will have their work cut out for them, it's going to be hell... or they may enjoy the hits.
 
Top Bottom