Also El Topo, I'll look at your vote next, but it's 2am here so there is a slight chance I might not be able to post about it until tomorrow. I'll try to post now though!
It's 1am over here, so I likely won't read it anyway before I go to bed.
Also El Topo, I'll look at your vote next, but it's 2am here so there is a slight chance I might not be able to post about it until tomorrow. I'll try to post now though!
Stuff and a vote.
I'm curious though cabot, something I thought about, what would your power have done if there was a tie?
The first one was a bit late, but if you read carefully I was the first to point out the "obvious" in said posts. I was the first to point out list of reads are stupid, then everyone followed, since everyone has such a list boner.
Its silly to say I am just pointing the obvious, because pretty much is all I can do right now, since I don´t have any other information besides my own role. Do you any information the rest of town is not aware of?
just like old days, corn
anyways I'm a bit busy at the moment but while I'm here for a sec, when's a good time to role claim?
1 hour before the deadline? 30 mins? 15? This is assuming I get bangwagoned by the deadline.
okay, so Burbeting, if you were to put a vote on someone, would it be one of your three? or would it be somebody else entirely?
I'd say 15 mins or less, so that nobody has time to react properly and the whole thread ends up in chaos.
Dudeinteresting
if we can get a consensus "yea" to this idea, that's what I'll do
And then there is that just weird game with *Splinter. What was the point of that?
The first contributions to the game were talking about Cabot breadcrumping with Palmer, and then voting for him later. There was some thoughts before it, but I do think that kingkittys reasoning for voting Cabot was kind of weak.
After that kitty posts after Fireblend and me have voiced some mild concerns about him. I mentioned that I felt he got overly aggressive about those mild suspicions. He gets does downplay that as humor, but I dont know it seemed bit overblown for some reason.
In Kittys later votes one thing struck really odd, it was the oh I had a legit idea in my mind why Cabot was not scum but eh I voted anyway. Oh really now? This could easily be scum trying to justify himself in hindsight Well I did think you were possibly a good guy after all!
Dude
Two hours at least, whether you're bs'ing or not
Anything less is a policy lynch
?lol what the fuck is this shit
Fuck I don't see anything. :/
Seems alright to meFor that matter, anyone who is around, thoughts on Master Splinter?
Seems alright to me
Honestly though every time I go to post something today I just feel like I'm repeating myself.
"Low content bad, low activity bad but not really, vague scum feeling from someone based on almost nothing" etc.
I regret focusing early on poorly contributing players, it seems we're all going round and round on that point with nothing interesting coming from it. The worst part being that it's such an easy thing to blend in on.
Eh, day 1 sucks.
Burbeting does have interesting posts I guess. I'll go through them again when it isn't 2am. For now though my vote is still on Kalor, I guess that's a good a place as any.
He's invisible. He was invisible all last game too (no offence Kal). I'd like to find a better reason to vote someone but I'm not there yet.Why Kalor?
He's invisible. He was invisible all last game too (no offence Kal). I'd like to find a better reason to vote someone but I'm not there yet.
I could probably share a list of people I'm less willing to vote for, is that beneficial?
Salva: yes so far. I'm divided on him though. As I think we already mentioned he is quite hard to manipulate which is good if he's town. On the other hand I've just remembered he can be quite frustrating in his reads, just putting people up on "gut feeling" and rarely giving deeper analysis.You don't feel the same way about SalvaPot? Hyperactivity? kingkitty?
Salva: yes so far. I'm divided on him though. As I think we already mentioned he is quite hard to manipulate which is good if he's town. On the other hand I've just remembered he can be quite frustrating in his reads, just putting people up on "gut feeling" and rarely giving deeper analysis.
Hyperactivity: ehh a bit. I feel he's said more than Kal/Salva though. However my only experience of Hyper is Beagle/Corgi in the Blargohunt, so I'm surprised we haven't seen more from him. In fairness Blargohunt wasn't (anywhere close to) a normal game so I shouldn't take too much from it.
Kitty: He hasn't done much until very recently. I like his playstyle though, he'll create an unusual situation purely to see people's reactions (a technique I try to borrow). I guess he's hard to read, so a good candidate for today.
If anyone has anything compelling to say in Kalor's defense my vote would probably move to Hyperactivity.
For that matter, anyone who is around, thoughts on Master Splinter?
If Corn is scum I'd love to see him try to hide it.
It's mostly him not matching up with my expectations. Plus I can't remember any original ideas coming from him which makes me think he's blending, though I'd have to double check his history before I try to argue that.So, what exactly are you looking for in your vote? For Kalor, it's a lack of presence; but if you move your vote to Hyper, I'm not sure what you're basing it off of since he's made his opinions known recently.
Any reason you didn't include fireblend?You don't feel the same way about SalvaPot? Hyperactivity? kingkitty?