NinjamicWZ
Banned
Please port away. I don't have a WiiU and all the physical copies are going up in price too much for me to even try getting one. That started happening before the price ever went down on the system, really.
wow that is lame as fuck
Yeah. I have a WiiU why should I upgrade to this for the same games?
i hope they call it Mario Kart 8.8
You shouldn't, I won't be either. Mario Kart and Smash are already iterative enough, don't need the same games again. Will get Zelda on WiiU and wait.Yeah. I have a WiiU why should I upgrade to this for the same games?
I think I know the answer to this, but...
My Wii U came with a digital version of Wind Waker.
Is this copy forever tied to that console and will just be gone forever if I sell the Wii U?
I haven't kept up, but am pretty confident that Nintendo hasn't provided a real solution yet for tying digital games to any kind of account system.
lolI'm betting they just showed off a retro course since it was the furthest a along.
Yeah. I have a WiiU why should I upgrade to this for the same games?
You shouldn't, I won't be either. Mario Kart and Smash are already iterative enough, don't need the same games again. Will get Zelda on WiiU and wait.
Because they weren't showing off the new Mario Kart game; they wanted to show off the system with showing as little about the games as possible. We don't even know what it's called. So including a retro track or something we have already seen before would be a good way to "show it without showing it".lol
It is literally the same course as MK8.
Why would they show an old track of all things to introduce their new Mario Kart game? Doesn't even make sense.
Insider Emily Rogers confirms that Splatoon is an enhanced port, like Zelda, but not a sequel to the original game.
She's saying that Splatoon, Mario Kart, Zelda and Smash Bros will all be enhanced ports.
Source: https://twitter.com/ArcadeGirl64/status/789468839033483264
Was it preinstalled or was it a code? A code should be tied to your account. Preinstalled copies are gone forever.
Well now, this changes everything. How awful.
Switch has gone to a sale/price drop purchase at best, pretty unacceptable given how long they've had. I was excited for new games they've been talking up but clearly those are not happening.
Genuinely surprised at how many are supporting this decision by Nintendo (but maybe that's exactly why they are?), I'd not say it's consumer friendly especially given their already premium price on retail games.
Well now, this changes everything. How awful.
Switch has gone to a sale/price drop purchase at best, pretty unacceptable given how long they've had. I was excited for new games they've been talking up but clearly those are not happening.
Genuinely surprised at how many are supporting this decision by Nintendo (but maybe that's exactly why they are?), I'd not say it's consumer friendly especially given their already premium price on retail games.
Yes, of course if this turns out to be total nonsense and we get those new titles then it does change things again... But haven't most been saying the source has been completely vindicated now ergo this is likely to also be bang on the money?/snip
So basically charging full price for what would be considered DLC in the majority of other games? 'Games as services' is automatically good thing now too? For games with a heavy online presence, sure, but how many of those are we expected to see or have seen on Ninty platforms? One thing a lot of people praise Nintendo for is their firm stance on the opposite of these trends; strong retail presence, complete games upon launch, no nickle and diming, offline functionality, etc.Those updates will probably add meaningful new content like new courses and new maps. Maybe over Switch's lifespan too, "games as services".
Plus there's Zelda at launch. And probably a brand new IP, similar to Splatoon.
Hold a button to overlay the map on the screen, then press a hotkey to select who you warp too. This really isn't rocket science.
lol
It is literally the same course as MK8.
Why would they show an old track of all things to introduce their new Mario Kart game? Doesn't even make sense.
The problem here lies in the language. I think we all see that Nintendo has an idea of producing updated and expanded editions of Mario Kart, Splatoon, and Smash Bros. Some people are using the word "port" and "remaster" which are open to interpretation, but those usually mean - same game on different machine. We may need to look at these games the same way we look at updated versions of sports games, or arcade games that have featured smaller updates and were given a subtitle to indicate they were "different games".
All three are work-in-progress (assuming Smash), and we will have to wait for official confirmation on how much the content and visuals are being upgraded.
Well now, this changes everything. How awful.
Switch has gone to a sale/price drop purchase at best, pretty unacceptable given how long they've had. I was excited for new games they've been talking up but clearly those are not happening.
Genuinely surprised at how many are supporting this decision by Nintendo (but maybe that's exactly why they are?), I'd not say it's consumer friendly especially given their already premium price on retail games.
Mario Kart doesnt change all that much between iterations so I don't see the point of a port.
Smash I could see considering all the DLC and there's a good chance there won't be other Smash in a good while.
As for Splatoon, it could go either way.
I say good because Nintendo devoted a lot of time and resources to those games, and the Wii U sold like shit. This will justify that time and those resources, allow for a swifter release, and get the teams working on proper sequels while potentially millions more people are enjoying these games for the first time.
The problem here lies in the language. I think we all see that Nintendo has an idea of producing updated and expanded editions of Mario Kart, Splatoon, and Smash Bros. Some people are using the word "port" and "remaster" which are open to interpretation, but those usually mean - same game on different machine. We may need to look at these games the same way we look at updated versions of sports games, or arcade games that have featured smaller updates and were given a subtitle to indicate they were "different games".
All three are work-in-progress (assuming Smash), and we will have to wait for official confirmation on how much the content and visuals are being upgraded.
Sure, as soon as this doesn't mean actual sequels are being held back because of these when likely the majority of people who will first get the Switch likely owned a Wii U and those games with it...
I am sure those people will be happy with Zelda and Mario and Metroid. Nintendo is not going to say "hey, those Wii U owners already played these games. We owe them sequels asap, whether or not we can turn these enhanced ports over in an eighth of the time and sell millions of copies."
Edit: Ok maybe not Metroid, but Retro's game at least![]()
Double edit: The Wii U has some amazing games that deserve to be played by more people, and I see no problem with mixing those games, in an enhanced fashion, into the lineup along with the new games.
Mario will take a while more likely, Zelda got to see if what are the benefits of Zelda on Switch compared to Zelda on Wii U, and who knows what the hell Retro is doing or when it's coming out even. So yeah so far only Zelda in terms of games and even that's even coming out on Wii U.
Like I said before, at first likely the majority of people getting this will also be people that got a Wii U and even more likely has those games already.
For the others upcoming games that won't be port and that aren't currently announced (like theses ports aren't announced yet).