Because they lowered the price? Read the OP. The software is also a lot cheaper than from when it was in disc form.Jamesfrom818 said:What makes you think they'll really pass the savings onto the consumers?
Because they lowered the price? Read the OP. The software is also a lot cheaper than from when it was in disc form.Jamesfrom818 said:What makes you think they'll really pass the savings onto the consumers?
outunderthestars said:Apple users are used to getting less for their money.
This is just another step in their AOL styled "walled garden" philosophy.
Wow, you agreed with the joke character?Jangocube said:Ya basically.
Still don't get why people support a company so heavily when they seem to be very anti-customer. Least from what I've seen.
numble said:Because they lowered the price? Read the OP. The software is also a lot cheaper than from when it was in disc form.
Jangocube said:Ya basically.
Still don't get why people support a company so heavily when they seem to be very anti-customer. Least from what I've seen.
It's $100 cheaper.Jamesfrom818 said:Was it bolded? I guess I missed it. Playing Tales of Vesperia at the same time.
Cheap and plentiful!planar1280 said:what about external drives
dream said:The Joanna Stern just reviewed the MacBook Air and doesn't seem too bothered by the lack of an optical drive.
I'm not talking about console warz nor saying anything has happened ... yet.numble said:No, why would Apple care about stuff, thats too much console warz stuff. They made $7.3 billion in the last 3 months with minimal marketshare gains (outside of iPad) but strong growth in their already high-margin products. They don't care about losing the market to cheap HTPCs when those guys are not making any money from it, they only care about negative absolute growth, which has not happened.
dallow_bg said:Wow, you agreed with the joke character?
People who want a desktop Mac (and it's been growing at a good rate and is a healthy business for Apple, the Mac business brings about $5 billion in revenue per quarter and growing), are not going to buy a new $1200-$2000 iMac every 4-5 years. They'll plunk down a one time cost for a Thunderbolt Display and swap out a Mac Mini every 4-5 years.Raistlin said:I'm not talking about console warz nor saying anything has happened ... yet.
My premise is HTPC / media streaming may make up a large user-base of the Mini. If that is the case, sales of this particular product may, long-term, erode.
If it makes it easier for this discussion, let's not even consider external competition at all. In many ways it may be the internal cannibalization that does it. With portable devices becoming cheaper and cheaper, and iTV or a combination of iTV and iPad will ultimately serve a large segment better. And since screen prices have come down enough ... for those that want a functioning computer as well, an Air or MacBook may be the better overall solution.
It's not that I think the entire market will drop out from underneath the Mini, but as you said, it's more about growth. If there is negative growth for this long-term ... because their other products are actually picking up the slack ... will Apple see a reason to continue the line if they feel their customers are already being served in other lines?
Do we actually have sales data that supports this?numble said:People who want a desktop Mac (and it's been growing at a good rate and is a healthy business for Apple, the OS X business brings about $5 billion in revenue per quarter and growing), are not going to buy a new $1200-$2000 iMac every 4-5 years. They'll plunk down a one time cost for a Thunderbolt Display and swap out a Mac Mini every 4-5 years.
Where is your data regarding it being mostly used for HTPCs? The total Mac revenue line is available in their earnings releases.Raistlin said:Do we actually have sales data that supports this?
outunderthestars said:Excuse me, did you just call me a joke?
DO you honestly believe that Apple doesn't have a walled garden approach to business?
or that they don't charge more for less with their machines?
then again you are both a NIntendo AND an Apple fan. You're used to getting the shaft from companies...
mrkgoo said:I honestly believe that they don't charge more for less. It's just that I feel that I'm getting out of it might just be more than someone like you would.
There's nothing wrong with that, but you gotta see it from others' point of view too.
And yes, Engadget kinda sucks now. Not because of this piece, but I used to got there a lot, and increasingly, the comments are unfunny and a bit too 'try-hard'.
outunderthestars said:Excuse me, did you just call me a joke?
DO you honestly believe that Apple doesn't have a walled garden approach to business?
or that they don't charge more for less with their machines?
then again you are both a NIntendo AND an Apple fan. You're used to getting the shaft from companies...
LCfiner said:they charge more because they actually pay attention to design and thats worth the premium. laptops that come close to the battery life, screens and build quality of the Macbook Pro and macbook air cost approx the same. (and none actually match the build quality. and non have the superior Mac OS)
their design chops may not mean anything to you, personally, but if you cant recognize what they do well, then, yes, you are a joke. sorry
sarcastor said:![]()
just get an external usb dvd writer if you need it. Just someone make me a 17" laptop that's as thin as the Macbook Air pleaaaseeeeee.....
outunderthestars said:You can buy laptops with better procesors, ram, hdd, and videocards for MUCH less than their machines.
As to the premium aspect there are three people in this thread and a whole topic about on the front page about shoddy mac drives and laptops. The argument of "well it's a mac so it is better" is the same marketing spiels used by Monster Cables and Bose to overcharge for their products.
No amount of personal insults change the fact that you pay a hefty premium for the Apple name.
Not that I expect a serious discussion on PC vs Mac (one of the dumbest debates), but you didn't address one of the advantages he listed for Macs.outunderthestars said:You can buy laptops with better procesors, ram, hdd, and videocards for MUCH less than their machines.
I've been able to walk in and get my Apple products serviced (even when I personally was responsible or when my laptop was out of warranty) in Beijing, Hong Kong, Los Angeles, and New York. It's a nice premium.outunderthestars said:You can buy laptops with better procesors, ram, hdd, and videocards for MUCH less than their machines.
As to the premium aspect there are three people in this thread and a whole topic about on the front page about shoddy mac drives and laptops. The argument of "well it's a mac so it is better" is the same marketing spiels used by Monster Cables and Bose to overcharge for their products.
No amount of personal insults change the fact that you pay a hefty premium for the Apple name.
SnakeXs said:Which is why arguing with people like you is useless. You obviously care nothing for design and hardware beyond raw horsepower. You don't get it. That's fine. Move along.
outunderthestars said:yea, damn us people who actually think that the case is secondary to the utility of the device.
Anyhow, this is derailing the tread, let's agree to disagree.![]()
SnakeXs said:I for one care more about size, weight, battery life, a backlit keyboard, a fantastic screen, the world's greatest trackpad, and software to leverage at all, and heck even pure aesthetics over a few more 3DMark or Geekbench points, or saving 3 minutes when encoding a movie.
But that's just me.
bionic77 said:The truth is that there is no single computer or laptop that is for everyone.
outunderthestars said:You can buy laptops with better procesors, ram, hdd, and videocards for MUCH less than their machines.
As to the premium aspect there are three people in this thread and a whole topic about on the front page about shoddy mac drives and laptops. The argument of "well it's a mac so it is better" is the same marketing spiels used by Monster Cables and Bose to overcharge for their products.
No amount of personal insults change the fact that you pay a hefty premium for the Apple name.
LyleLanley said:App store to install a new os, internet recovery if you have a problem with it or if you have no internet you can get Lion on a memory stick. Also, who uses a CD or DVD to upgrade an OS?
But basically 0% of Mac Lion users though.Jin34 said:LOL, almost everyone.
Jin34 said:LOL, almost everyone.
outunderthestars said:You can buy laptops with better procesors, ram, hdd, and videocards for MUCH less than their machines.
As to the premium aspect there are three people in this thread and a whole topic about on the front page about shoddy mac drives and laptops. The argument of "well it's a mac so it is better" is the same marketing spiels used by Monster Cables and Bose to overcharge for their products.
No amount of personal insults change the fact that you pay a hefty premium for the Apple name.
SeanR1221 said:The thing that gets me more than the optical drive is the SSD. I get it, they're expensive, but 1,000.00 only gets me 64GB? I can't live off of that. At least make it easy to upgrade.
LyleLanley said:64GB for $1000? Where are you seeing this?
LCfiner said:1K gets you a macbook air with 64 GB.
SeanR1221 said:The lowest tier Air. It only has 64GB of storage.
Unless I'm missing something, it's pretty much impossible to upgrade without voiding your warranty, right?
LyleLanley said:Oh, Ok. Yeah it's fairly expensive and you can't upgrade it but it's not like they're just putting a stock ssd in there.
I never said mostly, or at least didn't intend to imply it. What I suspect is a sufficiently significant percentage use it in that manner such that if they left to other solutions, it could lead to sufficient negative growth to bring the line's relevance into question. Particularly if Apple sees a fair amount moving to their other offerings.numble said:Where is your data regarding it being mostly used for HTPCs? The total Mac revenue line is available in their earnings releases.