• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Engadget: Apple is over the optical drive.

Status
Not open for further replies.

numble

Member
Jamesfrom818 said:
What makes you think they'll really pass the savings onto the consumers?
Because they lowered the price? Read the OP. The software is also a lot cheaper than from when it was in disc form.
 

Jangocube

Banned
outunderthestars said:
Apple users are used to getting less for their money.

This is just another step in their AOL styled "walled garden" philosophy.

Ya basically.

Still don't get why people support a company so heavily when they seem to be very anti-customer. Least from what I've seen.
 

dallow_bg

nods at old men
Jangocube said:
Ya basically.

Still don't get why people support a company so heavily when they seem to be very anti-customer. Least from what I've seen.
Wow, you agreed with the joke character?
 
numble said:
Because they lowered the price? Read the OP. The software is also a lot cheaper than from when it was in disc form.

Was it bolded? I guess I missed it. Playing Tales of Vesperia at the same time.
 

The Lamp

Member
dream said:
The Joanna Stern just reviewed the MacBook Air and doesn't seem too bothered by the lack of an optical drive.

For a Macbook Air...which serves an obviously different function to a home desktop.

Where the hell is my blu-ray, Apple?
 

Raistlin

Post Count: 9999
numble said:
No, why would Apple care about stuff, thats too much console warz stuff. They made $7.3 billion in the last 3 months with minimal marketshare gains (outside of iPad) but strong growth in their already high-margin products. They don't care about losing the market to cheap HTPCs when those guys are not making any money from it, they only care about negative absolute growth, which has not happened.
I'm not talking about console warz nor saying anything has happened ... yet.


My premise is HTPC / media streaming may make up a large user-base of the Mini. If that is the case, sales of this particular product may, long-term, erode.

If it makes it easier for this discussion, let's not even consider external competition at all. In many ways it may be the internal cannibalization that does it. With portable devices becoming more and more powerful, an iTV or a combination of iTV and iPad will ultimately serve a large segment better. And since screen prices have come down enough ... for those that want a functioning computer as well, an Air or MacBook may be the better overall solution.

It's not that I think the entire market will drop out from underneath the Mini, but as you said, it's more about growth. If there is negative growth for this long-term ... because their other products are actually picking up the slack ... will Apple see a reason to continue the line if they feel their customers are already being served in other lines?
 
dallow_bg said:
Wow, you agreed with the joke character?


Excuse me, did you just call me a joke?

DO you honestly believe that Apple doesn't have a walled garden approach to business?

or that they don't charge more for less with their machines?

then again you are both a NIntendo AND an Apple fan. You're used to getting the shaft from companies...
 

bionic77

Member
I am done second guessing Apple after I predicted that the iPad would remain a niche product.

This smells like like the floppy situation. I mean honestly how often do most people use their dvd drives and burners anymore? It just seems like such a pain in the ass most of the times and usually I try to use drop box or email for sharing something and Netflix for watching movies.

It is strange that every single Apple makes gets so much discussion from people who never have any intention of ever buying an Apple product.

I really wonder which direction Apple is going to go with the Pro when they eventually ditch the optical drive. Will they give us a bigger battery? Second HD? Or will they slim it down? Very interesting to see which direction they go in.
 

numble

Member
Raistlin said:
I'm not talking about console warz nor saying anything has happened ... yet.


My premise is HTPC / media streaming may make up a large user-base of the Mini. If that is the case, sales of this particular product may, long-term, erode.

If it makes it easier for this discussion, let's not even consider external competition at all. In many ways it may be the internal cannibalization that does it. With portable devices becoming cheaper and cheaper, and iTV or a combination of iTV and iPad will ultimately serve a large segment better. And since screen prices have come down enough ... for those that want a functioning computer as well, an Air or MacBook may be the better overall solution.

It's not that I think the entire market will drop out from underneath the Mini, but as you said, it's more about growth. If there is negative growth for this long-term ... because their other products are actually picking up the slack ... will Apple see a reason to continue the line if they feel their customers are already being served in other lines?
People who want a desktop Mac (and it's been growing at a good rate and is a healthy business for Apple, the Mac business brings about $5 billion in revenue per quarter and growing), are not going to buy a new $1200-$2000 iMac every 4-5 years. They'll plunk down a one time cost for a Thunderbolt Display and swap out a Mac Mini every 4-5 years.
 

Raistlin

Post Count: 9999
numble said:
People who want a desktop Mac (and it's been growing at a good rate and is a healthy business for Apple, the OS X business brings about $5 billion in revenue per quarter and growing), are not going to buy a new $1200-$2000 iMac every 4-5 years. They'll plunk down a one time cost for a Thunderbolt Display and swap out a Mac Mini every 4-5 years.
Do we actually have sales data that supports this?
 

numble

Member
Raistlin said:
Do we actually have sales data that supports this?
Where is your data regarding it being mostly used for HTPCs? The total Mac revenue line is available in their earnings releases.
 

sarcastor

Member
USB2_0_External_dvd_rw_burner_writer.jpg


just get an external usb dvd writer if you need it. Just someone make me a 17" laptop that's as thin as the Macbook Air pleaaaseeeeee.....
 

mrkgoo

Member
outunderthestars said:
Excuse me, did you just call me a joke?

DO you honestly believe that Apple doesn't have a walled garden approach to business?

or that they don't charge more for less with their machines?

then again you are both a NIntendo AND an Apple fan. You're used to getting the shaft from companies...


I honestly believe that they don't charge more for less. It's just that I feel that I'm getting out of it might just be more than someone like you would.

There's nothing wrong with that, but you gotta see it from others' point of view too.


And yes, Engadget kinda sucks now. Not because of this piece, but I used to got there a lot, and increasingly, the comments are unfunny and a bit too 'try-hard'.
 
mrkgoo said:
I honestly believe that they don't charge more for less. It's just that I feel that I'm getting out of it might just be more than someone like you would.

There's nothing wrong with that, but you gotta see it from others' point of view too.


And yes, Engadget kinda sucks now. Not because of this piece, but I used to got there a lot, and increasingly, the comments are unfunny and a bit too 'try-hard'.

Yup, I'm pretty sure everyone who owns a mac, myself included, knows we could get a a similarly priced computer with better internals but we pay the premium for the other parts of the computer/software.

As for Engadget, that place really is crap now. Hey, great job figuring out that Apple is slowly getting rid of optical drives, what tipped you off? Was it the release of the original Macbook Air over three years ago?
 

LCfiner

Member
outunderthestars said:
Excuse me, did you just call me a joke?

DO you honestly believe that Apple doesn't have a walled garden approach to business?

or that they don't charge more for less with their machines?

then again you are both a NIntendo AND an Apple fan. You're used to getting the shaft from companies...

they charge more because they actually pay attention to design and that’s worth the premium. laptops that come close to the battery life, screens and build quality of the Macbook Pro and macbook air cost approx the same. (and none actually match the build quality. and non have the superior Mac OS)

their design chops may not mean anything to you, personally, but if you can’t recognize what they do well, then, yes, you are a joke. sorry
 
LCfiner said:
they charge more because they actually pay attention to design and that’s worth the premium. laptops that come close to the battery life, screens and build quality of the Macbook Pro and macbook air cost approx the same. (and none actually match the build quality. and non have the superior Mac OS)

their design chops may not mean anything to you, personally, but if you can’t recognize what they do well, then, yes, you are a joke. sorry

You can buy laptops with better procesors, ram, hdd, and videocards for MUCH less than their machines.

As to the premium aspect there are three people in this thread and a whole topic about on the front page about shoddy mac drives and laptops. The argument of "well it's a mac so it is better" is the same marketing spiels used by Monster Cables and Bose to overcharge for their products.

No amount of personal insults change the fact that you pay a hefty premium for the Apple name.
 
The main uneasiness from me comes from the fact that it feels like Apple is trying to seal off all their computers into their own "walled garden" of itunes, mac app store, etc. just like all the ios devices.

I still think that while no optical drives on laptops is a smart move, removing them from desktops is a bit overkill.
 

SnakeXs

about the same metal capacity as a cucumber
outunderthestars said:
You can buy laptops with better procesors, ram, hdd, and videocards for MUCH less than their machines.

As to the premium aspect there are three people in this thread and a whole topic about on the front page about shoddy mac drives and laptops. The argument of "well it's a mac so it is better" is the same marketing spiels used by Monster Cables and Bose to overcharge for their products.

No amount of personal insults change the fact that you pay a hefty premium for the Apple name.

Which is why arguing with people like you is useless. You obviously care nothing for design and hardware beyond raw horsepower. You don't get it. That's fine. Move along.
 

bionic77

Member
outunderthestars said:
You can buy laptops with better procesors, ram, hdd, and videocards for MUCH less than their machines.
Not that I expect a serious discussion on PC vs Mac (one of the dumbest debates), but you didn't address one of the advantages he listed for Macs.

The truth is that there is no single computer or laptop that is for everyone.
 

numble

Member
outunderthestars said:
You can buy laptops with better procesors, ram, hdd, and videocards for MUCH less than their machines.

As to the premium aspect there are three people in this thread and a whole topic about on the front page about shoddy mac drives and laptops. The argument of "well it's a mac so it is better" is the same marketing spiels used by Monster Cables and Bose to overcharge for their products.

No amount of personal insults change the fact that you pay a hefty premium for the Apple name.
I've been able to walk in and get my Apple products serviced (even when I personally was responsible or when my laptop was out of warranty) in Beijing, Hong Kong, Los Angeles, and New York. It's a nice premium.
 
SnakeXs said:
Which is why arguing with people like you is useless. You obviously care nothing for design and hardware beyond raw horsepower. You don't get it. That's fine. Move along.


yea, damn us people who actually think that the case is secondary to the utility of the device.

;)

Anyhow, this is derailing the tread, let's agree to disagree. :)
 

SnakeXs

about the same metal capacity as a cucumber
outunderthestars said:
yea, damn us people who actually think that the case is secondary to the utility of the device.

;)

Anyhow, this is derailing the tread, let's agree to disagree. :)

I for one care more about size, weight, battery life, a backlit keyboard, a fantastic screen, the world's greatest trackpad, and software to leverage at all, and heck even pure aesthetics over a few more 3DMark or Geekbench points, or saving 3 minutes when encoding a movie.

But that's just me.
 

twofold

Member
SnakeXs said:
I for one care more about size, weight, battery life, a backlit keyboard, a fantastic screen, the world's greatest trackpad, and software to leverage at all, and heck even pure aesthetics over a few more 3DMark or Geekbench points, or saving 3 minutes when encoding a movie.

But that's just me.

You forgot to mention the magsafe connector, too. I lost a Sony Vaio laptop because the cord was wrapped around my leg when I stood up. My magsafe has already saved me two MBPs.

Disagree on the screen, though. Where's my matte option for the 13", Apple?!
 

LCfiner

Member
outunderthestars said:
You can buy laptops with better procesors, ram, hdd, and videocards for MUCH less than their machines.

As to the premium aspect there are three people in this thread and a whole topic about on the front page about shoddy mac drives and laptops. The argument of "well it's a mac so it is better" is the same marketing spiels used by Monster Cables and Bose to overcharge for their products.

No amount of personal insults change the fact that you pay a hefty premium for the Apple name.

if that’s all you think a computer is about, then you will never understand why people would prefer a Mac.

there is a unique design to the oversized trackpad that works with the customized software to make navigation easier. there is the battery that lasts 10 hours in a machine that weighs 5 pounds and is one inch thick. there’s the sleep mode that lasts 30 days on the macbook air and every laptop wakes from sleep in an instant.

see where I’m going? if you don’t give a shit about actually interacting with your computer and software, then you’ll never understand why someone would find value in those things over raw CPU speed.

and using anecdotal evidence from this forum to talk about reliability? lol. check the actual stats. top of the charts year after year for least amount of failures. They’re not worse than other premium sellers. plus there’s the bonus of the apple stores for easy service if things do wrong

the comparison to Monster and Bose is wrong headed and only makes sense to you as you seemingly don’t understand the other design aspects that add actual utility and value for people who buy a Mac. Monster HDMI cable adds no improvement to signal over a monoprice cable. that is not the case with running OS X or having a huge battery life in a light frame.


A Mac is not for everyone but it’s foolish to assume that it offers nothing special for anyone
 

Jin34

Member
LyleLanley said:
App store to install a new os, internet recovery if you have a problem with it or if you have no internet you can get Lion on a memory stick. Also, who uses a CD or DVD to upgrade an OS?

LOL, almost everyone.
 

teh_pwn

"Saturated fat causes heart disease as much as Brawndo is what plants crave."
Wow. No disc drive with a desktop is impossible for me. I use it to install OSes, large software apps (like office), PC games outside of steam (rather not spend a day downloading 20 GB), movies (HTPC), burnt media, and ghost boot discs.

And slow down the kernel? A device driver for a disc drive? Is your computer using punch cards or something? Linux distributions support plug & play for all sorts of media and run faster than Windows and OSX.
 

Polari

Member
I just built a new computer without an optical drive. I don't get what Engadget are all so butthurt about. The vast majority of consumers Apple are targeting with the Mini aren't going to care.
 

SeanR1221

Member
The thing that gets me more than the optical drive is the SSD. I get it, they're expensive, but 1,000.00 only gets me 64GB? I can't live off of that. At least make it easy to upgrade.
 

mrkgoo

Member
outunderthestars said:
You can buy laptops with better procesors, ram, hdd, and videocards for MUCH less than their machines.

As to the premium aspect there are three people in this thread and a whole topic about on the front page about shoddy mac drives and laptops. The argument of "well it's a mac so it is better" is the same marketing spiels used by Monster Cables and Bose to overcharge for their products.

No amount of personal insults change the fact that you pay a hefty premium for the Apple name.

Since when was a computer just about the specs? Does software, aesthetics, was and comfort of use ever come into it? I'm not saying YOU have to appreciate things beyond the raw ingredients of something, but can you not see that others might?

It's like, say, you put a pile of ingredients to make a meal in front different cooks. One makes a perfectly cooked steak with a side of mashed potatoes, served with a knife and fork and charges $20, the other makes a hamburger and fries in a paper bag, charges $10. Hell, maybe a third puts them all in a blender and charges $5. You're completely entitled to choose the meat smoothie if you want, but even though all three give you the same sustenance, can you not see that the experience could be different depending on what you value? Likewise, there's nothing wrong with going for the burger. MMmm. Delicious. But does that mean the people who go for the steak are insane or bad consumers?

Crap, I would probably go for the hidden 4th option and make it myself for cheaper - but again, not everyone is willing or wants that.


Ok weird analogy.



It's a weird argument, this PC vs Mac debate - the debate is always the same (on both sides, admittedly), but Apple fans hardly ever say that "well it's a mac, therefore it's better". In actuality, it's more often the detractors that put that in our mouths. And we never damned people who consider specs above all else.

We're not putting the aesthetics ahead of utility. We're putting pleasure and enjoyment ahead of it. Damn us for enjoying our machines/devices? And even that said, there is PLENTY of utility you get for getting a Mac.
 
SeanR1221 said:
The thing that gets me more than the optical drive is the SSD. I get it, they're expensive, but 1,000.00 only gets me 64GB? I can't live off of that. At least make it easy to upgrade.

64GB for $1000? Where are you seeing this?
 

SeanR1221

Member
The lowest tier Air. It only has 64GB of storage.

Unless I'm missing something, it's pretty much impossible to upgrade without voiding your warranty, right?
 
LCfiner said:
1K gets you a macbook air with 64 GB.

SeanR1221 said:
The lowest tier Air. It only has 64GB of storage.

Unless I'm missing something, it's pretty much impossible to upgrade without voiding your warranty, right?

Oh, Ok. Yeah it's fairly expensive and you can't upgrade it but it's not like they're just putting a stock ssd in there.
 

eastmen

Banned
LyleLanley said:
Oh, Ok. Yeah it's fairly expensive and you can't upgrade it but it's not like they're just putting a stock ssd in there.


wht ssd is it ? I've seen ssd's go for $70 bucks for 64GB .
 

SeanR1221

Member
Yeah, it's the one thing holding me back. I was inches away from buying an Air until I realized my research alone takes up 90GB on my MacBook.
 

Raistlin

Post Count: 9999
numble said:
Where is your data regarding it being mostly used for HTPCs? The total Mac revenue line is available in their earnings releases.
I never said mostly, or at least didn't intend to imply it. What I suspect is a sufficiently significant percentage use it in that manner such that if they left to other solutions, it could lead to sufficient negative growth to bring the line's relevance into question. Particularly if Apple sees a fair amount moving to their other offerings.

As for HTPC usage data, no I haven't seen hard data - it isn't released to my knowledge. So it's primarily anectodal, though not simply from peers. I've been heavily involved in computing, home theater, and CE for better than two decades. While pouring through articles, magazines, forums, conferences, etc ... I've seen significant usage of the the Mini primarily for media from many users. That isn't to say people don't use if for other things as well, but it certainly seems to not only be cited as a major use, but many owners even specifically cite it as an HTPC solution when people are asking for recommendations.

Similarly, my involvement has yielded the impression that as far as Mac OS distribution, iMac and their laptop lines seems to be the lion's share of the userbase. The Mini has always seemed to come off as a niche product in their portfolio by the industry, etc.




When you say the total Mac revenue line is available, does it separate things into products? If it does, and there's any indication that you're correct in theorizing it isn't niche, and moreover actually represents a majority of desktop sales I'll be happy to retract my entire theory. Certainly if it is a big seller as a general desktop, there's no reason to assume HTPC competition will have serious consequences. Can you supply the data?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom