• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

EU profits as Trump turns away from trade - European Commissioner

Status
Not open for further replies.

Usobuko

Banned
The United States' new hostility to free trade deals under President Donald Trump is benefiting the European Union, the bloc's top trade official said Tuesday.

After Trump's withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal in late January, "many countries are now turning to us, because they believe protectionism is not the right answer," European Commissioner Cecilia Malmstrom told German business newspaper Handelsblatt.

"We are already negotiating with almost all of them, or preparing conversations" with the countries around the Pacific Rim that had signed up to the US-led treaty, she went on.

Since Trump's election, the Commission has sped up talks with Mexico, South American trade bloc Mercosur, and Japan, is preparing possible talks with Australia and New Zealand, and has a completed deal with Vietnam on the table, Malmstrom noted.

"We have a well-stocked pipeline," she said.

source

Reminder that Trump's likely EU ambassador would love for it to go away and Marine Le Pen visiting Trump Tower last month. Good luck EU, don't let them get what they want at your expenses.
 

UberTag

Member
So many wins for the rest of the world thanks to Trump. They're going to win so much, they may even get tired of it.

Shame about the States, though.
 
uk:
iP42wHz.gif
 

border

Member
Exactly how is the death of TPP benefiting European countries? They all compromised on TPP, but now believe they can get better deals, so they are negotiating everything on a country-by-country basis?
 
Exactly how is the death of TPP benefiting European countries? They all compromised on TPP, but now believe they can get better deals, so they are negotiating everything on a country-by-country basis?

TPP doesn't include EU.
Now EU can be included.

Don't mix up TPP and TTIP.
 

tuxfool

Banned
Exactly how is the death of TPP benefiting European countries? They all compromised on TPP, but now believe they can get better deals, so they are negotiating everything on a country-by-country basis?

The TPP is the Trans Pacific Partnership. Nothing to do with the EU.

TTIP is the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. That is dead due to Trump, and it had its pros and cons. It certainly wasn't an outright win.

With the TPP dead, pacific nations are looking to create other deals to sell into large trading blocs. If they can't sell into the US, they're more than happy deal with the EU (in addition to China's TPP alternative).
 

wildfire

Banned
It's like watching the decline of the USA in fast forward.


We aren't going to decline fast economically.


We have too many geographical advantages.



In fact we are posed to get even more powerful in 10 years if the oil producing countries get into internal tumoils at the same time the aging population of China puts alot of pressure on their young adults unable to deal with the burden because of the 1 child policy greatly limiting their numbers.


We are declining in power politically at an fast pace.
 
We aren't going to decline fast economically.


We have too many geographical advantages.



In fact we are posed to get even more powerful in 10 years if the oil producing countries get into internal tumoils at the same time the aging population of China puts alot of pressure on their young adults unable to deal with the burden because of the 1 child policy greatly limiting their numbers.


We are declining in power politically at an fast pace.

That appears to be another China will fall for sure rhetoric like history is an invisibile hand, busy with putting China down.

More important than a large younger population would be having a highly educated youth, something that is not gonna improve under Trump. Automamtion will do the rest improving the efficiency of an average worker massively.
 
"many countries are now turning to us, because they believe protectionism is not the right answer," European Commissioner Cecilia Malmstrom told German business newspaper Handelsblatt.

Uh..isn't the EU a protectionist entity?
 
Uh..isn't the EU a protectionist entity?
They were much more protectionist than the USA, and in fact with the UK gone I don't actually expect the EU to finish many good free trade agreements, as the UK was probably their biggest champion of them. France, Italy, etc will push for managed trade deals, but maybe Germany will actually push for free trade.
 

jelly

Member
Uh..isn't the EU a protectionist entity?

If you mean protecting their own goods from being sold as if they were from EU countries like cheese, wine for example then yes and what trading bloc/nation doesn't have their interests to some degree as a priority. Trump's protectionism is different than what other countries do in trade deals. Compromise so both parties benefit.
 

dumbo

Member
Exactly how is the death of TPP benefiting European countries? They all compromised on TPP, but now believe they can get better deals, so they are negotiating everything on a country-by-country basis?

TPP was billed as the 'blueprint for all future trade deals'. It was largely defined by the US, specifically large US corporations seeking additional protection (for IP/profits/law etc).

Once that was signed, any other treaty that those nations signed would need to be compatible with TPP. The result is that the EU would be slowly pressured into accepting that nonsense from the US.

With TPP off the table, things are obviously a lot rosier for the EU (and arguably the entire world if you think TPP/TTIP sucked).
 
TPP/TTIP were neoliberal nightmares. We are lucky that Republicans went into full partisan politics regarding to everything Obama related, so they killed it although the trade deals couldn't be more Republican like.
 

kmag

Member
Yes, the largest free trade zone in the world is a protectionist entity.

Well it is to be fair. All trade blocs are protectionist to some extent, I mean it's the entire purpose of forming a trade bloc (the simple rule of free trade is the biggest trading entity has more power to define trade)

Internally in the single market the EU isn't protectionist, to external parties it is (mainly in the area of agriculture, the CAP for instance is extremely protectionist)
 
With the US out of the picture we can have the EU lead actual free trade agreements and not the dystopian nightmare that the US had in store for us with TPP and TTIP (Thanks Obama lol) Hopefully when you guys kick out the Republicans and return your country to its senses everything is already set up so that you can join us and get the benefits.
 

kyser73

Member
Guys, I hate to burst your bubble on the EU, but while many of its member-states are solid social-democracies with good welfare safety nets, essentially free health care and so on, the EU itself is as neo-liberal as it comes, with competition rules and privatisation happening as they do elsewhere - railways, energy & so on are all in the frame for it over the next 10-15 years.

Regarding the CAP...no more or less protectionist that the US, and the post-way famine in Europe is still an abiding memory for many EU politicians. Not that it isn't a complete clusterfuck that massively distorts the food market in Europe, fucks developing market growers and so on...
 
Well it is to be fair. All trade blocs are protectionist to some extent, I mean it's the entire purpose of forming a trade bloc (the simple rule of free trade is the biggest trading entity has more power to define trade)

Internally in the single market the EU isn't protectionist, to external parties it is (mainly in the area of agriculture, the CAP for instance is extremely protectionist)

Forming a large trade bloc to gain more bargain power for trading deals isn't a form of protectionism. Protectionism is the policy of restraining trade between countries, something that isn't the case with the EU - quite the opposite.

One of the main goals of the EU is to etablish trading deals between other countries, that those deals aren't wet dreams of neoliberals and anglo saxons is a good thing and an argument for the EU.
 
Forming a large trade bloc to gain more bargain power for trading deals isn't a form of protectionism. Protectionism is the policy of restraining trade between countries, something that isn't the case with the EU - quite the opposite.

One of the main goals of the EU is to etablish trading deals between other countries, that those deals aren't wet dreams of neoliberals and anglo saxons is a good thing and an argument for the EU.
Please, I don't think you know how trade deals actually work. You would likely label any non-managed trade deal neoliberal. Let me guess you think Investor dispute settlement is a bad thing? That's probably the worst argument I heard from antiTPP and TTIP people, so I'm curious if you believe that too.
 
Please, I don't think you know how trade deals actually work. You would likely label any non-managed trade deal neoliberal. Let me guess you think Investor dispute settlement is a bad thing? That's probably the worst argument I heard from antiTPP and TTIP people, so I'm curious if you believe that too.

How I'm supposed to see things like Regulatory Cooperation Council or the race to the bottom of standards and norms? Maybe we can also ask Canada how ISDS worked out for them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom