StereoVsn
Member
Which is why it’s silly to propose that Carthage was colonizing Italy in the sense that people mean under colonization now days.Ah, yes. The Phoenicians had a great deal of influence on Greek culture.
Which is why it’s silly to propose that Carthage was colonizing Italy in the sense that people mean under colonization now days.Ah, yes. The Phoenicians had a great deal of influence on Greek culture.
But their source for Yasuke is saying what they believe is true.
We can argue that the name doesn't matter but it's a prime example of how companies like Ubi are only pretending to be culturally sensitive when they haven't the faintest idea what they're doing. We have plenty of non-gendered names but they went with the equivalent of naming a burly viking Samantha.
This is where they’re failing. They really don’t listen at all. They still think that the big global Assassin’s Creed audience is interested in these western focused and politically driven stories that ”push bounderies and matter”."To our players - the ones who have stood by us, supported us and celebrated our work over the years with enthusiasm and constructive feedback - this stance is for you," Coté concluded. "You are the heart of our journey. We create for you, and your support fuels our creativity and strengthens our resolve to keep pushing boundaries, to tell stories that matter. This journey is yours as much as it is ours, and I thank you for being with us every step of the way.
Only Edward’s game was set in the Caribbean, and he was white European.It's funny how he brings up past AC protagonists but fails to mention that in their Italian Ac games, they picked an italian guy. not an indian or an arab or american. in their american AC games, they picked a native american and a white guy, not an italian or japanese or an arab guy. in their african AC game, they picked an african guy. not a white guy. For their greek and english AC games, they picked a greek and for their viking AC game they picked a dude straight out of norway.
What’s so wrong with it in principle that it can’t be justified other than “they wanted to do it”? People don’t have to buy it, but to say that it’s illegitimate in some sort of pseudo legal or “traditional” way is a little unhinged.And yet for some reason, they are choosing an african dude for their very first game set in Asia. you simply cannot justify this and definitely not by bringing up past AC games.
Well I bet they've seen it now but the problem is that these examples happened way after the grand majority of the game was already done with... Also the rare incel victory that was Outlaws lol.
I am sure his stance is going to help sales tremendously!
Edit: What I don’t understand is what the fuck are executives doing!? Concord, Veilguard, this game. After seeing pushback and hell, even before that , why the fuck would they keep pushing while knowing it is doing to tank sales?
It won't be though, it's going to be another super mid generic Ubisoft open world like the last 37 Ubisoft open world gamesThe game might be the best Assassin's Creed yet, but this and their responses is what will be remembered.
I said time periods/historical events that never get covered. Egypt would hardly apply. And when was I rage baiting or whatever it is you're going on about?They have already explored northern Africa (Egypt) in AC origins, genius. If they do another one in Africa, the goal posts with many of you rage-baiting, fake gamers would then shift and you would find other reasons to scream "woke".
For the most part only Asian Americans account for diversity with these people especially in regards to men. Hell, that new scooby doo cartoon is doing the same thing as shadows where they go to Japan and team up with a black boy and a Japanese girl.I'm confused here, japanese asians no longer considered diverse people? Did they remove asian men from the catalog? Is a japanese man now seen as equivalent to the so-called feared Western white man?
Pretty bold to push that ridiculous narrative, underestimating the intelligence of the entire world.
Don't forget
Here hereWhat a prick - I have bought nearly every Assassins Creed game (and have platinumed Black Flag and everything from Syndicate onwards) and I think it sucks that they are trying to fight culture wars with their daft premise for this game. This isn’t about the fans - it’s about a select few bellends telling people what to think. I paid nearly £100 for Outlaws and it is a big disappointment - is there any sign of them being conciliatory at all or is it all just our fault?
If he wants all the people who paid full price for their games in the past to fuck off so they can get new, morally better fans, good for him - but then don’t whine when your stock tanks.
It does not, yet you try to challenge people with it and they get defensive.Can someone explain to me how any of this DEI makes sense from a business perspective?
I said goal post shifting, and that's exactly what you did. Easy work.I said time periods/historical events that never get covered. Egypt would hardly apply. And when was I rage baiting or whatever it is you're going on about?
That was literally the only post I made in the thread, how was I moving goal posts? No idea what you are on about man.I said goal post shifting, and that's exactly what you did. Easy work.
The large majority of people don't know what Assassin's Creed is and have never held a gamepad.
First I’ve heard itI was hoping to read why they have chosen a black man as the main character, but instead do they keep talking about the female main character.
I haven't heard much backlash about this. Does anyone actually have a problem with the female protagonist?
"devastating" impact of Shadows' diversity and inclusivity backlash
The discussions initiated by this "small minority" are having substantial effects on the sales of woke games though. There's a substantial portion of the gaming audiences opposing the wokeficiation of western games by activists. Publishers/developers who are blind to the increasing consumer backlash or ones who double down on the woke elements like this game director to spite the chuds are going to be in for a world of financial hurt.
Western publishers don't seem to know their audience anymore and they've let their development studios get infiltrated by activist who want to push THE MESSAGE. That's fine for an indie game, but when it comes to $200 million AAA games that need to sell at least five million copies just to recoup the development costs, this is a recipe for disaster. They need to understand why Japanese games are now more popular than they've ever been in the last fifteen years while western games are getting rejected by western audiences, because if they don't they'll go under.
Why? Japan isn't a homogeneous country. Though the Yayoi,the ancestors of the current inhabitants tried to genocide the Ainu,the most original inhabitants of Japan that still exists,the Ainu should be depicted in Japanese entertainment more.There's no need for diversity and inclusion in Japan setting, especially at that time. All they had to do was make a cool Japanese protagonist, cash out the big bucks, and avoid all this drama, but they're tripling down and they'll fall massively for it. Now they're looking for petty points. Ubisoft can fuck off and die.
Carthage was not a tributary of Rome until after the Second Punic War. It was during this war that Hannibal invaded Italy. Prior to that they had been competing empires, vying for control of the Mediterranean. Prior to the First Punic War Carthage had been the stronger of the two empires with control over Sicily and Sardinia. They clashed and Rome won.Yeah, so never. Hannibal didn’t try to colonize Rome. He went there with the intent of beating them on their own turf and draw them out.
Carthage was a tributary to Rome. They were the ones getting squeezed dry. It wasn’t some kind of war of aggression that Hannibal attempted like the others you mentioned.
This echoes the selfless bravery of our Assassin's Creed protagonists," he continued. "They fought for freedom, knowledge and the right to chart their own paths, just as we, as creators…
Hmm? Was Nioh a DEI game? Did anyone actually care about the protagonist being European? The studio is Japanese based too.Not a single person gave a flying fuck about Naoe being female. The last two AC games had optional female leads that were well received and dialogued.
They’re quadrupling down on this horrible Yasuke decision and it’s laughable.
This game and all the other DEI infested games out there can rot.
Sounds good! I look forward to a future Assassin's Creed where you play an historical figure in the Royal Navy as they combat slave traders, including native Africans, in 19th century Sierra Leone. No compromises, right?
I'm confused here, japanese asians no longer considered diverse people? Did they remove asian men from the catalog? Is a japanese man now seen as equivalent to the so-called feared Western white man?
Pretty bold to push that ridiculous narrative, underestimating the intelligence of the entire world.
Sorry, Japan is hardly represented in anything? Lmao, give me a break.This is the weirdest aspect of the entire thing, a nation rarely represented in anything isn’t diverse enough against what exactly?
What questions are those? Please, explain. Because it appears to be about skin colour on every side of this argument.So then it comes down to skin colour which we all know this is about, which raises even more questions.
The main difference is that Nioh developers didn't make the game with DEI politics in mind. Shadows was made with checkboxes to tick and that's what we don't like.Hmm? Was Nioh a DEI game? Did anyone actually care about the protagonist being European? The studio is Japanese based too.
This is the Wikipedia entry about the zee game.
Set during a fictionalized version of the year 1600, the plot follows the journeys of William Adams, an Irish sailor named after and inspired by the historic William Adams, an Englishman who became a samurai. Adams pursues the sorcerer Edward Kelley into the final battles of the Sengoku period during Tokugawa Ieyasu's efforts to unify Japan, an effort complicated by the emergence of yōkai that are flourishing in the chaos of war. Gameplay revolves around navigating levels and defeating monsters that have infested an area; combat revolves around stamina or "Ki" management and different sword stances that are strong or weak against different enemies.
Nioh - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Hmm? Was Nioh a DEI game? Did anyone actually care about the protagonist being European? The studio is Japanese based too.
This is the Wikipedia entry about the zee game.
Set during a fictionalized version of the year 1600, the plot follows the journeys of William Adams, an Irish sailor named after and inspired by the historic William Adams, an Englishman who became a samurai. Adams pursues the sorcerer Edward Kelley into the final battles of the Sengoku period during Tokugawa Ieyasu's efforts to unify Japan, an effort complicated by the emergence of yōkai that are flourishing in the chaos of war. Gameplay revolves around navigating levels and defeating monsters that have infested an area; combat revolves around stamina or "Ki" management and different sword stances that are strong or weak against different enemies.
Nioh - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
"Assassin's Creed has always been about exploring the full spectrum of human history, and by its very nature, that history is diverse. Staying true to history means embracing the richness of human perspectives - without compromise. For example, in Assassin's Creed Shadows, we highlight figures, both fictional like Naoe, a Japanese woman warrior, and historical, like Yasuke, the African born samurai. While the inclusion of a Black samurai in feudal Japan has sparked questions and even controversy, Naoe, as a fictional character, has also faced scrutiny for her gender.
So then, all of this historical accuracy stuff is trite then? If everyone’s making fun of this guy for his mentality? Either AC is the Fast & Furious of gaming in its mass appeal brainless slop, or it’s a piece of video game art that should be “historically accurate” to fit into the tapestry of auteur projects. Can’t be both.Framing AC slop as a piece of culturally significant art and a vanguard of evolved thinking.
Its a Ubi checkbox game. Strip all the controversy away and its a chore simulator.
No,there real isn't. Assassin's Creed is already a long running game, taking Yasuke or any similar character with be a shake-up for the series instead of designing/writing totally new character.There's a difference between the two games and this quote illustrates that difference:
Nioh, just like your summary states, is a "fictionalized version of the year 1600". Ubisoft has gone back and forth on this, but it appears they are back to Yasuke was a samurai. This point is contentious in terms of its accuracy. We have scholars, historians, and many Japanese people who are asserting this is not an accurate portrayal of their history and we have even more who believe this is just Ubi being Ubi - except this time, the blow back for their virtue signalling was a little more than they expected. Everyone will have their own opinions on that, but Nioh - which is entirely a work of fiction and never pretended to be otherwise - is fundamentally different from Shadows, imo.
No,there real isn't. Assassin's Creed is already a long running game, taking Yasuke or any similar character with be a shake-up for the series instead of designing/writing totally new character.
Where are these experts? Also, you do realize Ass Creed is an action/adventure game,you thought Yasuke inclusion was solely for looks?
Sorry, Japan is hardly represented in anything? Lmao, give me a break.
What questions are those? Please, explain. Because it appears to be about skin colour on every side of this argument.