Red Arremer
Member
I'm sorry but my gaming hard drive literally just died. I'll have to reinstall Steam and EU4 real quick, and I hope I won't delay the game too much.
I'm sorry but my gaming hard drive literally just died. I'll have to reinstall Steam and EU4 real quick, and I hope I won't delay the game too much.
That sucks, my hardrive is also on the verge of giving up, real loud all the time and almost 100% disc usage.
Mamluks AAR:
It was also nice to experience a session with no disconnects and minimum lag overall (the only one who made game drop to speed 1 was Red Arremer, and only once). Thank you based FACE.
you mean the Common Sense expansion?
MP has been a little more flickering this last session, but it worked really great when those with turd computers and internet dropped out
fuck Burgundy in particular.
Brandburgian AAR:
Fuck this game, fuck Pomerania, fuck Saxony, fuck Lithuania, fuck Utrecht and fuck Burgundy in particular.
I sense some enmity in this post.Brandburgian AAR:
Fuck this game, fuck Pomerania, fuck Saxony, fuck Lithuania, fuck Utrecht and fuck Burgundy in particular.
Change in Development: 480 -> 610
He failed as a man, as an ally, as a friend, and put shame upon your waifu
Mamluks AAR
Vassalized Yemen, took the rest of Hejaz, integrated Iraq, took Funji or whatever that randomly popped up and began westernizing. Figured I might as well do that, since KingSnake is a bit held back by swahili ingame and RL internet tech at the moment, and moving on the Ottomans seems a bit risky right now.
Turd Sultana died one month after initiating the W-process and investing all adm points to get to 0 stability and to deal with a stupid westernizing event, so I'm a bit yolo on national unrest etc atm.
Also: I have more development than Japan, lelelelelelel.
The Chapel is amazing. I love the East to Westernisation one, showing what Spirited is doing wrong! Coalition is also too damn good.
that's not a guaranteed westernization in multiplayer. Also my current plan is BADASS.
Stefan's Portugal.
Isn't westernizing off of Finnmark pretty BADASS?
Looking at the map it's pretty far into the future though, maybe even 20-30 years
Yay AI. At least I can say it took 6 rivals surrounding me to defeat me. Hell, now that the Teutons border me again (thanks Red!) I might get a seventh rival. I should get an achievement for that.
Eurotrip 1538
Paradox should borrow an idea from the Veritas et Fortitudo mod: players can gain legitimacy by putting the king in charge of the army and winning battles. At least that way there's an obvious tradeoff: you gain legitimacy but there's a chance of your ruler dying in battle (though depending on his stats that might not be a bad thing). Also, I would be okay if legitimacy was part of an idea set. (IMO, Paradox should add a centralization idea group which includes increased legitimacy, decreased autonomy, more tax income, and maybe something like better loyalty or less influence from the estates). At the moment, any nation that gains legitimacy from national ideas has a huge, underrated advantage. Another suggestion is that nations shouldn't suffer a legitimacy hit for royal marriages at low legitimacy.AAR:
I had a decent session, where I first regained my old Ferrarian land, and then decided it was time to finally get back at Genoa for getting me in that stupid war with the ottos last time. Since every viable province in Italy would cause me a huge coalition, I decided to take Ragusa instead. At the end of the session, I finally got the unavoidable Civil War, since there is nothing i can do to increase legitimacy. Their armies are huge, and their troops are great, lets just hope they wont brake my country. Seriously, the legitimacy system needs reworking, I have had bad legitimacy for what feels like forever, and there is basically nothing I can do to increase it, ultimately getting me into situation like this. Fucking hell. I
Provinces gained: Modena, Ferrara, Ragusa
Allies Gained: Venice
Allies lost: Genoa
Paradox should borrow an idea from the Veritas et Fortitudo mod: players can gain legitimacy by putting the king in charge of the army and winning battles. At least that way there's an obvious tradeoff: you gain legitimacy but there's a chance of your ruler dying in battle (though depending on his stats that might not be a bad thing). Also, I would be okay if legitimacy was part of an idea set. (IMO, Paradox should add a centralization idea group which includes increased legitimacy, decreased autonomy, more tax income, and maybe something like better loyalty or less influence from the estates). At the moment, any nation that gains legitimacy from national ideas has a huge, underrated advantage. Another suggestion is that nations shouldn't suffer a legitimacy hit for royal marriages at low legitimacy.