If it requires a 460 then you can absolutely play it just fine at 1080p at 60ish fps on a 750ti and a i5 3570k oc'd
Evil Within System & Hard Disk Requirements (PC/Consoles), strongly suggests 4GB VRAM
- Thread starter DarkLordMalik
- Start date
If it requires a 460 then you can absolutely play it just fine at 1080p at 60ish fps on a 750ti and a i5 3570k oc'd
SolarPowered
Member
Was that so hard, Bethesda? There we go. Owners of 2GB 600+ cards will have a great time with the game, especially at 1080p.
Should a new thread be made for new news? It'll take a while to shake the stigma of needing a 4GB card now...
Should a new thread be made for new news? It'll take a while to shake the stigma of needing a 4GB card now...
SargerusBR
I love Pokken!
Finally i can preorder this, thanks buddy.
Thank god I can play it then. Its basically the wolfenstein minimum requirements.
SargerusBR
I love Pokken!
I'm ready.
Crimsonclaw111
Member
To be fair, an i7 is also recommended for Mordor and benchmarks show ancient, shit AMD CPUs pushing 100fps with a good video card.
Wait... Wrong thread? Now I'm confused.
-MD-
Member
i7 definitely isn't minimum even if it says it.
drotahorror
Member
I figured as such but the PC version has the black bars as well right?
InfiniteNine
Rolling Girl
The PC version has a toggle for it.
drotahorror
Member
Hah, they found a 460 laying around or ebayed one for cheap and ran a test with it.
These devs just don't have a bunch of different pc's to test this on.
-MD-
Member
Thought it could be only changed through the console? I don't think it'll be an in-game option.
Cool, I had no idea it would be possible at all. I am definitely playing TEW in fullscreen if given the option to do so.
Games need much better system requirement info than the current standard provides. A minimum for each class of cpu would be a good start.
i7 860 is the minimum requirement I guess unless you have an i5 that is faster or an i3 or even a celeron depending on what year you bought the pc.
i7 860 is the minimum requirement I guess unless you have an i5 that is faster or an i3 or even a celeron depending on what year you bought the pc.
alexandros
Banned
Crisis averted, then? After this and the Shadows of Mordor panic I hope that we've all learned a valuable lesson here.
I'd say PC, both your CPU and graphics card are better than the ones powering the PS4.
I'd say PC, both your CPU and graphics card are better than the ones powering the PS4.
DarkLordMalik
Member
Updated the OP with the min specs.
I am going for the PS4 version anyways so the min specs don't make much of a difference to me.
I am going for the PS4 version anyways so the min specs don't make much of a difference to me.
That's why I'm laughing, they seem to be inept at releasing correct info for this game
FrostuTheNinja
Member
I just squeaked by. Absolute minimum requirements. Might have to wait on this one. :/
DeadManWalking
Member
That's not how comparing console to pc works..., but say whatever you want.
alexandros
Banned
Feel free to provide a better method of comparison if you have one. He asked a question based on specs.
That's gotta be it. These are still ridiculous requirements. An i7 as *minimum*? Cant play at 1080p without *recommended*(ie 4GB vRAM)?
C'mon now.
alexandros
Banned
I couldn't help but wonder if this is some sort of ploy from Intel, AMD and Nvidia in order to get more people to upgrade. Then I gave it some more thought and I realised that game publishers would have no reason to agree to something like this since listing artificially inflated system requirements would reduce their game sales. So I ended up on the classic saying "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity".
Bl@de
Member
My Xeon CPU hopes so^^ HT should be used more often. But I guess games just don't care (except Crytek).
EDIT: i7 can mean everything ... from i7 2700k to i7 5960X
Facism
Member
yo can i get a link for this as i have an ancient AMD cpu but a somewhat decent card
That's what I don't get - this is gonna do nothing but scare some people off buying it.
My conspiracy idea was that they are trying to get people to buy consoles, cuz they know people pay more money for the game on console.
I do like the idea that they simply don't have a range of PC's to test this on, though. That sounds plausible to me.
Bl@de
Member
Don't put so much thought in it. Alexandros is probably right. The people releasing it were stupid or lazy like most of the population. It's not healthy to see conspiracies everywhere.
I don't see conspiracies everywhere! lol Far, far from it. I wasn't really being serious as my last comment suggested.
Not having a range of PC's to test on isn't a conspiracy theory, its an entirely possible scenario.
Crimsonclaw111
Member
There's a picture of the benchmarks in the Mordor performance thread but I can't fish it out atm because I'm on mobile.yo can i get a link for this as i have an ancient AMD cpu but a somewhat decent card
alexandros
Banned
My money's on Arkham Knight.
Prophet Steve
Member
Actually the AMD CPUs seem to do a lot worse there. Old Intel CPUs push 100fps though.
GhostTrick
Banned
Bl@de
Member
Nah GTA 5. Remember GTA 4 and Max Payne 3. The Thread is going to be fun. First the wait, then the hyperbole^^
And mid-range one at that. Aside from the I7 the requirements are very tame.
And I5 could run Wolfenstein just fine, I doubt this will be a problem with Evil Within.
http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/wolfenstein-the-new-order-test-gpu.html
Hey guys, do you think the game will work fine with my Asus GTX760?
http://www.amazon.it/gp/product/B00DM9B6FO/
http://www.amazon.it/gp/product/B00DM9B6FO/
Yes, but 2GB of VRAM will mean sacrifices in plenty of areas. The wording suggests 4GB is necessary for console parity in terms of effects and assets.
Dictator93
Member
alexandros;132698183So I ended up on the classic saying "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity".[/QUOTE said:
Lord Phol
Member
I've got:
i5 3570K (ivy bridge) @ 3,4 Ghz
GTX 680 @ 2GB VRAM
16GB RAM
It worked fine for Shadow of Mordor playing on high (with shadows on medium) even though the req were 4GB VRAM. Hoping that's the case here as well. Rather not upgrade until there are more and cheaper 6-8GB VRAM options.
i5 3570K (ivy bridge) @ 3,4 Ghz
GTX 680 @ 2GB VRAM
16GB RAM
It worked fine for Shadow of Mordor playing on high (with shadows on medium) even though the req were 4GB VRAM. Hoping that's the case here as well. Rather not upgrade until there are more and cheaper 6-8GB VRAM options.
CyanideFuse
Member
Do effects get affected that much by VRAM? A fair number of console games have had effects toned down or removed where as I have been able to push them on my 2GB card.
All the fuss over Shadows of Mordor have not really transpired for me. I am running a mix of high/ultra (including DOF and tessellation) with high textures at 60fps for the most part.
I am aware that going further into the future will incur more issues.