Ass of Can Whooping
Gold Member
don't perm me yet mods i'm just getting started
It makes sense if those games were pushing hardware numbers and/or Gamepass subs. But those have stagnated even with the release of StarfieldThe more I think of it, the more Jez is probably right on this.
How does it make sense to allow CoD to be 100% multiplatform, and other developers are forced to remain exclusive? And yet these same studios would have to layoff employees if their games don't reach target numbers/performance. That's totally unfair to their other studios.
So in a way, did Microsoft acquiring Activision essentially make them fully commit to third party in some strange twist of fate?
-Spends 80 billions for Bethesda and Activision to dominate gaming subscriptions.
-Goes 3rd party.
-....HUH?
Good then the fake narrative that it’s shit will end and people will realize it has the best gameplay of any MP shooter on the market.
Starfield was a 7/10 game for me. It is worth playing. It totally ruined the excitement of exploration which was the game's unforgiveable flaw, but it was worth playing. The faction quests were good. I finished it and got 1000 achievement points on PC.
I do hope that they will optimize it to get 60 fps on consoles. That needs to happen.
Bottom line: Starfield missed the mark of being great (or even good) by quite a bit, but it still has some value and will be worth checking out by curious PS fans.
except those that want Gamepass already have Gamepass.Isn't putting their games on every device possible the way to dominate gaming subscriptions? Netlfix is on every device, MS wants gamepass to use the same strategy.
I love youdon't perm me yet mods i'm just getting started
Apex is shit compared to the speed of Infinite.Apex Legends players would probably tell you you're wrong, and they'd probably be right.
Of course. Dumb Xbox fans have not bought the game since they played it on Gamepass, so financially the game was very unsuccessful, so in order to make some money game need to be sold on other consoles.
You want exclusives: buy your games. Devs won’t be making games that are not bought, I can’t even comprehend how Xbox fans don’t understand this very simple fact.
The only prediction post from this fella which will ever come true and they banned him for it!
Fookin lool
As a console maker, probably. Looking at the last two generations, that ship has already sailed. Nothing they have tried has gotten the results they want. However, they are about to open the flood gates for gaming revenue. They have left so much money on the table trying to buy their way into being the market leader and now they are about to start making that back.For MS as a console maker. Might be for the best as they have poor leadership. Xbox One being underpowered, going all it on a rental service, allowing the
Series X to have parity with the PS5 when they could have easily made it stronger, creating the Series S in hopes of funneling into the rental service, etc. Could go on and on.
I think a lot of people are missing the point.Isn't putting their games on every device possible the way to dominate gaming subscriptions? Netlfix is on every device, MS wants gamepass to use the same strategy.
Apex is shit compared to the speed of Infinite.
An investment they just dialed back on long after their 2021 plans.I think a lot of people are missing the point.
Every extra Xbox game sold on other platforms is just a net win for MS if this is their multiplatform strategy.
Spiderman 2 cost over $300 million to make, it isn't very sustainable and even Sony know it hence their investment in GaaS.
Except they will make more money, seems pretty positive to meThere not a spin strong enough to make this a positive for Xbox.
You know they don't sit around a table refreshing video game forums. They want to make money.There not a spin strong enough to make this a positive for Xbox.
Makes more sense than-Spends 80 billions for Bethesda and Activision to dominate gaming subscriptions.
-Goes 3rd party.
-....HUH?
except those that want Gamepass already have Gamepass.
Except they will make more money, seems pretty positive to me
You know they don't sit around a table refreshing video game forums. They want to make money.
Given what happened with Cyberpunk, Microsoft has a lot of work to do before this game is in shape to be on Sony’s platform.
Spiderman 2 cost over $300 million to make, it isn't very sustainable and even Sony know it hence their investment in GaaS.
It's just an example of how expensive game development is today and how the traditional avenue of "put game on shelf, sell game" doesn't hit the same in 2024, but if you have other confirmed dev budgets I could've used as an example instead so you didn't get upset, I'd be open to editing my post.An investment they just dialed back on long after their 2021 plans.
Sorry, but SonyToo™ ain't savin' shit today!
It works for literally everyone but MSIt's just an example of how expensive game development is today and how the traditional avenue of "put game on shelf, sell game" doesn't hit the same in 2024, but if you have other confirmed dev budgets I could've used as an example instead so you didn't get upset, I'd be open to editing my post.