TheRealTalker
Banned
you mean every one of those soldiers shot and killed civilians?
yeah I said I was leaving this thread
I am out
you mean every one of those soldiers shot and killed civilians?
Who also came out in unanimous support of Erdogen.Actually the wording has almost universally not used his name but rather "democratically elected government"
Who also came out in unanimous support of Erdogen.
These poor soldiers.
Greece or Bulgaria are always your closest options. Neither countries are among the richest in the EU (yes, an understatement), but they have proper internet (essential for your occupation), and well, don't have their Erdogans in power. So far.This country was mess but now... I can't even speech!
I must run from this hell. I'm an digital artist and can't live in Turkey anymore, i was already planning to run but now, i must do it soon, realy soon. Maybe someone can help me to find a job in nice country, i can work so hard for run this shit place. I dunno, i'm just trying my change here.
They even closed Paypal in Turkey and i was earn money with this way...
Some sample of my draw:
<snip>
Previous coups led to democratic elections.No, a successful military coup does not mean "democratically elected"
It is a very clear statement.
After the coup had failed.Who also came out in unanimous support of Erdogen.
Previous coups led to democratic elections.
The current state of the country is a "democracy" in name only.
I feel the same. I left Turkey years ago and have no intention of ever going back. Thinking about just cancelling my citizenship since I already have a Canadian citizenship as well.
America has never liked to deal with democracy in Muslim countries in the past when it wanted to change something. Before Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, a military coup was successfully implemented in Pakistan, similarly before the American second invasion of Afghanistan again Pakistan was put under military rule and Americans did all the dealing with a single dictator.
So I m sure this coup attempt by Americans was partoff their strategy for middle East. Now after its failure they must be scrambling for new strategy.
Btw if some one has seen the press release by the state department they might have noticed that it mentioned this coup as an uprising.
A "democratically elected government (which wasnt democratically elected" and that has killed much more than 100 people and jailed even more? Ah yes, such a nice democratic government for sure.poor soldiers?
you've got to be kidding me
do you realize that these cunts attempted a coup against a democratically elected government that has left more than 100 dead?
the liberal rhetoric on this forum is turning into plain and simple stupidity, and this thread is the perfect example
phony activists man, posting from their Iphones about human rights on the Internet while heading to the next pokestop
what a time to be alive
Yes, it was during the coup, but the statement does not mention Erdrogan. It does not mention ANYTHING specific. It's a deliberately vague statement designed to keep us the fuck out of things. It's Diplomacy 101.They made this statement during the coup. As the US's declaration of support for the current regime. They were in no way hedging their bets for the "winner".
Previous coups led to democratic elections.
The current state of the country is a "democracy" in name only.
After the coup had failed.
poor soldiers?
you've got to be kidding me
do you realize that these cunts attempted a coup against a democratically elected government that has left more than 100 dead?
the liberal rhetoric on this forum is turning into plain and simple stupidity, and this thread is the perfect example
phony activists man, posting from their Iphones about human rights on the Internet while heading to the next pokestop
what a time to be alive
Wrong again.After the coup had failed.
There are other statements diplomats use to express their desire to "keep us the fuck out of things".Yes, it was during the coup, but the statement does not mention Erdrogan. It does not mention ANYTHING specific. It's a deliberately vague statement designed to keep us the fuck out of things. It's Diplomacy 101.
poor soldiers?
you've got to be kidding me
do you realize that these cunts attempted a coup against a democratically elected government that has left more than 100 dead?
the liberal rhetoric on this forum is turning into plain and simple stupidity, and this thread is the perfect example
phony activists man, posting from their Iphones about human rights on the Internet while heading to the next pokestop
what a time to be alive
People in my extended family in Turkey have basically gone into hiding. I'm getting updates from Facebook that the Antakya Synagogue has been closed and that they're keeping indoors until things have settled down.
They didn't declare support. It is worded in a way where the US can retroactively claim it supported the winning side either way.There are other statements diplomats use to express their desire to "keep us the fuck out of things".
Declaring support for one side is the antithesis of this sentiment.
poor soldiers?
you've got to be kidding me
do you realize that these cunts attempted a coup against a democratically elected government that has left more than 100 dead?
the liberal rhetoric on this forum is turning into plain and simple stupidity, and this thread is the perfect example
phony activists man, posting from their Iphones about human rights on the Internet while heading to the next pokestop
what a time to be alive
My goodness. I'm done with you.They didn't declare support. It is worded in a way where the US can retroactively claim it supported the winning side either way.
Erdrogan wins = we support his "democratic" government"
Coup Wins = we want to see democratic elections ASAP
poor soldiers?
you've got to be kidding me
do you realize that these cunts attempted a coup against a democratically elected government that has left more than 100 dead?
the liberal rhetoric on this forum is turning into plain and simple stupidity, and this thread is the perfect example
phony activists man, posting from their Iphones about human rights on the Internet while heading to the next pokestop
what a time to be alive
They are the ones doing the killing of them.
Stockholm syndrome much?The police and most factions of the army were fighting the coupsters and half of the country stormed the streets in protest and some were willing to die to prevent this coup. Do you genuinenly think that anything good would've come out of this if it succeeded?
It would have led to a fucking civil war, that's what would've happened. Even as a Turk who is extremely opposed to Erdogan, a more authoritarian regime under Erdogan is something I would pick over a civil war any day of the week.
Fuck Gülen who was willing to steer this country into utter chaos or an authoritarian regime under Erdogan (depending on if it succeded or not) by orchestrating this coup
Ah yes, because clearly winning an election gives a ruler complete freedom to trample the Constitution of their nation and suppress some of the most basic human rights of its citizens.poor soldiers?
you've got to be kidding me
do you realize that these cunts attempted a coup against a democratically elected government that has left more than 100 dead?
the liberal rhetoric on this forum is turning into plain and simple stupidity, and this thread is the perfect example
phony activists man, posting from their Iphones about human rights on the Internet while heading to the next pokestop
what a time to be alive
poor soldiers?
you've got to be kidding me
do you realize that these cunts attempted a coup against a democratically elected government that has left more than 100 dead?
the liberal rhetoric on this forum is turning into plain and simple stupidity, and this thread is the perfect example
phony activists man, posting from their Iphones about human rights on the Internet while heading to the next pokestop
what a time to be alive
For accurately describing the amorphous statement the US put out that covered it's diplomatic bases while not directly committing a bet to a dog in the fight?My goodness. I'm done with you.
America has never liked to deal with democracy in Muslim countries in the past when it wanted to change something. Before Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, a military coup was successfully implemented in Pakistan, similarly before the American second invasion of Afghanistan again Pakistan was put under military rule and Americans did all the dealing with a single dictator.
So I m sure this coup attempt by Americans was partoff their strategy for middle East. Now after its failure they must be scrambling for new strategy.
Btw if some one has seen the press release by the state department they might have noticed that it mentioned this coup as an uprising.
Come to Germany
Btw. do you have any idea why turkish people who have been to Turkey once and actually have a German citizenship, grew up here, "live" German support Erdogan?
As a digital artist you could probably work from most European countries.
Also love the art style on some of these
Bionic warrior <3
Greece or Bulgaria are always your closest options. Neither countries are among the richest in the EU (yes, an understatement), but they have proper internet (essential for your occupation), and well, don't have their Erdogans in power. So far.
Oh wow, the Turkish minister of labor is on gaf :O
@140journos
Çalışma Bakanı Süleyman Soylu, Habertürk canlı yayınında konuşuyor: "Bu darbenin arkasında Amerika vardır."
@aykan_erdemir Aykan Erdemir hat 140journos retweetet
#BREAKING - #Turkish Minister @suleymansoylu announced on @HaberturkTV that #UnitedStates is behind the coup attempt
I was going to post precisely that: Erdogan will use Incirlik as a way to get Gulen, and Kerry's statement was pretty much "just give a good excuse to comply please, anything palpable will be fine".
Speaking of which, I got an alert earlier saying the US base had its power cut off and had been sealed off. Anyone know if there have been further developments?
Pretty scary when you have a member of cabinet throwing around rhetoric like that in the midst of this shitstorm.
They didn't declare support. It is worded in a way where the US can retroactively claim it supported the winning side either way.
Erdrogan wins = we support his "democratic" government"
Coup Wins = we want to see democratic elections ASAP
This is blatantly obvious because they did not name any specific parties.
There was a certain irony to Erdogan encouraging protests.All the Erdostans pearl clutching over the terrible amount of life lost in this coup but failing to mention Erdogan's bombing and killing of Kurds and his beating and killing of protestors.
All the Erdostans pearl clutching over the terrible amount of life lost in this coup but failing to mention Erdogan's bombing and killing of Kurds and his beating and killing of protestors.
No, the US stays the fuck out of it publicly until there's a victor. This is how diplomacy works- you do more harm than good publicly picking a side because it completely fucks with the internal politics of the other country.Nonsense. A military coup is the opposite of "democratically elected govt". Furthermore, considering the situation in the region, the US was not going to benefit from a coup.
There is little doubt the US had to support Erdogan.
Could you not form a company or LLC in said country and make that your way to stay as you employ yourself in a company you made in their country?That would be awesome, but you are joking right, right?
They are seeing Erdogan like a prophet. They are also brainwashed with islam and probably AKP feeding them.
Also there is 9 million people cannot read and write but they choose our future.
Hope i can.
Glad you like it, thanks.
Thanks for the tip. But i need to find a job for permission to stay.
Yes, but there's no reason to believe that a military dictatorship would be handling the Kurdish situation any better. If the past is any indication, they would not.
I'd rather see the US be closer to Russia than Turkey. Russia is fighting ISIS while Turkey is helping them, in spite of being targeted by the group.
We need to pack our nuclear weapons from there and send them elsewhere.
Maybe not. But I have no doubts the end result will be worse for Kurds in the future than a coup reset would have been.
Erdogan has replaced the entire judiciary and will now replace the military. When he becomes increasingly unpopular he's going to turn to nationalist politics again and use the Kurds as his political punching bag.
Is there are scenario that doesn't spell worse for the Kurds?