I agree. MARU was great. Envelope needs to be... returned to sender!
her voice acting - quality in Lagrange was pretty much Maka-tier, and she doesn't even have Omigawa's deliciously unique voice to make up for it.
I agree. MARU was great. Envelope needs to be... returned to sender!
Ah, I meant simply the first episode of SAO, not the series as a whole, I should have clarified that properly. >.<
As for your second paragraph, I disagree completely, but that's just me. I personally like the character designs in Magi a lot more, and I thought the decision to compress so many early chapters into one episode was a very good choice, since as I've already mentioned, early magi is not that good. the scenes with ugo and the plant monster were better animated than anything in the first ep of SAO as well.
This is a very dumb thing to say, especially when there are shounens that do deliver quality from the get-go.
This is a very dumb thing to say, especially when there are shounens that do deliver quality from the get-go. It's fine if you recognize the potential in something, and the series manages to follow through with it, but to say that's the standard by which shows should be judges is incredibly non-sensical. There are far more series with good potential that then gets squandered than there are series that manage to follow through with that potential. It's far more intellectually honest to simply admit "These shows sucked at first, but the author managed to single out the positive aspects and capitalize on them" than to try to twist their poor beginnings into "Oh, this means this will be good (maybe, at some point in the distant future)!"
Eww. Just ewww.her voice acting - quality in Lagrange was pretty much Maka-tier, and she doesn't even have Omigawa's deliciously unique voice to make up for it.
Which are these shounen that deliver quality from the get go?
Fullmetal Alchemist
Ill give you that one, but that show never felt like it was even the same genre to me
Shounen is not a genre.
How many episodes of Magi are planned ?
battle shounen is definitely a genre
Action/Adventure, you mean.
This is a very dumb thing to say, especially when there are shounens that do deliver quality from the get-go. It's fine if you recognize the potential in something, and the series manages to follow through with it, but to say that's the standard by which shows should be judges is incredibly non-sensical. There are far more series with good potential that then gets squandered than there are series that manage to follow through with that potential. It's far more intellectually honest to simply admit "These shows sucked at first, but the author managed to single out the positive aspects and capitalize on them" than to try to twist their poor beginnings into "Oh, this means this will be good (maybe, at some point in the distant future)!"
BLue Exorcist!
Agonizingly slow for the first half of its run.
BLue Exorcist!
I thought we were mentioning actually good episode 1's of the genre?
I thought we were mentioning actually good episode 1's of the genre?
im sorry but what? you can get a taste of the style and world building early on in a show
if its got good production values and is based on quality source material then there is absolutely no reason to disregard potential.
Which are these shounen that deliver quality from the get go?
I agree with most of this, but stories aren't always made up from one episode to the next. I don't see what's wrong with saying, "The show has a good concept and there are promising things about it (like the source material), but the author/director gave it a weak first episode."
I thought we were mentioning actually good episode 1's of the genre?
In this case Cosmic was referring to the source material itself, not the adaption. And if something has good production values and is based on quality source material, it should be good quality as well.
As for series that deliver quality from the very beginning,
Blue Exorcist, FMA, JoJo, and Beelzebub all had very strong beginnings, just to name a few.
Again, cosmic was referring to the source material itself, not the adaption.
MARUUUUUUUU
Hating on Kaori Ishihara smh
She's on my Chiaki Omigawa list.
I probably did come across as overly negative in my impressions. I did indeed find it underwhelming compared to my fairly high expectations based from the source material but it's still leagues above and beyond anything SAO could ever hope to deliver. I'd say it's worth checking out if you've had no prior experience with the franchise but the manga really would be a better option.Wonzo basically said it was ass. His impressions are the worst I've seen though.
I probably did come across as overly negative in my impressions. I did indeed find it underwhelming compared to my fairly high expectations based from the source material but it's still leagues above and beyond anything SAO could ever hope to deliver. I'd say it's worth checking out if you've had no prior experience with the franchise but the manga really would be a better option.
Cat flipping a table? Where do you find these things??
First episode of SAO was pretty stellar.
After rewatching Sword Art Online this week, I do not think I would have episode 1 of SAO as steller. It was basically as boring as watching someone play an RPG. It was just an intro to the world, and I think the anime really took off when they faced the first boss.
The first episode of SAO had promise. A real shame about the rest...First episode of SAO was pretty stellar.
Early parts of shounen should be judged on potential, not actual quality. Quality is only icing on the cake, and I'd say Magi delivers some of that as well. It really becomes something special when Balbadd happens.
a great first episode doesnt make it any more promising imo
when you're expecting a long running story involving many characters and elements, you need time to see how it all comes together.
we are in the anime thread discussing the premiere, so i assumed we were talking about the first episode.
of the mentioned shows which stayed good all the way through? not counting jojo since it just aired, i don't think any.
I'm pretty sure he's referring to the adaptation. After all, Uchip was talking about the first episode of One Piece and cosmic expanded that to shounen in general. He may have referenced the manga, but it was to explain that the material the adaptation is based on is good.
Well, whichever one he was referring to doesn't really matter. I don't see why authors aren't allowed to have a good overall concept in mind since the beginning but a weak first chapter/episode/whatever.
Agreed. The first episode was necessary and had some nice touches, but it was boring as sin.After rewatching Sword Art Online this week, I do not think I would have episode 1 of SAO as steller. It was basically as boring as watching someone play an RPG. It was just an intro to the world, and I think the anime really took off when they faced the first boss.
Sword Art Online suffers generally for being too bland.
Bland environment, bland main character design, bland story, bland music.
Accel world was way more fun.
He also said that he was retiring from the Manga thread and that he wasn't particularly thrilled by the negativity in the SAO thread/in this thread.
Guys, I'm worried about Articalys not appearing since his last post in here... did he say something more on IRC or anywhere else?
I'm not dead or anything, just real tired... anyway this is a pretty good summary...
They've started republishing the manga here in Brazil earlier this year, so I'm buying them monthly. By the time they reach volume 30 or so here I'll already be up to the latest anime episode, so hopefully I won't notice the pacing problems you mentioned.
MARUUUUUUUU
I want to Fuck my Brother #1234232 doesn't have that, I assure you.
This is a very dumb thing to say, especially when there are shounens that do deliver quality from the get-go. It's fine if you recognize the potential in something, and the series manages to follow through with it, but to say that's the standard by which shows should be judges is incredibly non-sensical. There are far more series with good potential that then gets squandered than there are series that manage to follow through with that potential. It's far more intellectually honest to simply admit "These shows sucked at first, but the author managed to single out the positive aspects and capitalize on them" than to try to twist their poor beginnings into "Oh, this means this will be good (maybe, at some point in the distant future)!"
I think you may have misunderstood what I said. It's no so much "oh wow, this world has potential, so it will definitely be good" as it's "this could turn into something I like, so I'll stick with it."
Shounen is a gamble because it takes a bigger commitment for something that could be a dud. On the other hand, the payoff is much greater imo if it's a hit.
I never read JoJo because it always seemed so long. Isn't it in like 8 parts?Also, shounen.
25-26.
Ah, I understand where you're coming from now, but I see it a different way. For me, Shounen isn't really a gamble, since if something has a poor start, I simply won't waste my time on it. See: One Piece, Naruto, Katekyo Hitman, and so on. For me, it's "is this actually enjoyable?" if the answer is yes, I continue until it stops being enjoyable. if the answer is no, I just stop there.
nooooooooooooooooooooo i want it to be longer
nooooooooooooooooooooo i want it to be longer