Gugure Kokkuri-san 01
Incredible. Great voice acting, amazing comedic timing, and fully capable of hitting a bleak and sympathetic tone even with all the fluffy tails and wit floating around.
Gugure Kokkuri-san 01
Incredible. Great voice acting, amazing comedic timing, and fully capable of hitting a bleak and sympathetic tone even with all the fluffy tails and wit floating around.
IS anyone truly caught up on this thread given how quickly it moves during the busy times?
Trinity Seven or whatever it's called has an identical scene in it today. Exciting, right?[On the nudity in Amagi Brilliant Park]
It was 'merely' the director showing us how otherworldly and different this 'magical' girl is. Baffle at her lack of emotions! Gasp at her inability to care about privacy! Etc etc.
Hey guy, an article from Kotaku on anime that's not completely terrible!
http://kotaku.com/making-anime-sure-doesnt-look-easy-1643253327
, but it's the thought that counts, right?Of course that's because it's just taken from a couple Korean blogs
"Making Anime Sure Doesn't Look Easy" Oh, yeah? Drawing thousands of pictures to create animation is trying?
"Making Anime Sure Doesn't Look Easy" Oh, yeah? Drawing thousands of pictures to create animation is trying?
Hearing people describe The Seven Deadly Sins as a budget Fairly Tale is pretty hilarious considering people already describe Fairy Tale as budget One Piece.
Hearing people describe The Seven Deadly Sins as a budget Fairly Tale is pretty hilarious considering people already describe Fairy Tale as budget One Piece.
Akatsuki no Yona Episode 1:
Boy, did this pick a bad season to exist in, although I do like the Dynastic China setting, everything else was just duller then dishwater. I think I shall pass on this title.
anime saved!
Hearing people describe The Seven Deadly Sins as a budget Fairly Tale is pretty hilarious considering people already describe Fairy Tale as budget One Piece.
Akatsuki no Yona is bad? Why do I even bother caring about anime.
1. Caesar is a garbage companion and Joseph is better in his Grandpa form.
2. The introduction of stands is literally the best thing to happen to the series and I'm glad Araki pushed Hamon aside once he had done all he could with it. There's about 2 or 3 uses of Hamon left in the entire 8 part series so say goodbye now.
People kept saying Old Joseph > Young Joesph but so far that's been a HUGE LIE. Y'all a bunch of liars! I'm also not sure what makes Caesar shit but whatever. Finally, while I agree that Stands were clearly the right way to take the series, I don't think the transition has been handled as well as it could have been. There's no reason the two couldn't coexist. If Part III is to be the Hamon's last hurrah, at least make Old Joesph suck less!
This series really was the beginning of the end for Sunrise when you look back.
I will stand behind Tiger and Bunny all day long. I definitely put it up there as one of Sunrise's best and actually legitimately good, unlike CG. It has a lot of problems, but the quality of character writing there is so good that those problems never bothered me.
Watamote 11
This episode actually did an alright job of showing the deeper seeded insecurities of our MC. I think the strength of this particular episode though was that it had people for Tomoko to interact with, which is something this show desperately needed. Acting like a moron and having so much inter-monologue can only work for so long. And their jokes were pretty decent this time around.
Also this episode had a whole bunch of references to KyoAni anime from Haruhi, K-On and Clannad. So it automatically won points just by that alone.
I completely forgot to mention this in my post, but I agree entirely with this criticism. I understand that the park is supposed to be run-down but frankly, it doesn't even look convincingly distressed. It lacks the detail and character of truly well drawn decay, compare and contrast with the Flowers of Evil. It takes considerably more work to make something like old than new so I can understand why most shows take corners when portraying "run down" buildings but they should have put more effort in here. Everything was just too clean and bland and considering that the amusement park itself is the key location they needed to give it some character.
Bad shows don't become good by referencing good shows.
I would certainly agree that straight up decay wouldn't be the correct look, but it still seemed really sterile and dull. You're certainly right to single out his living room though, it looks like something a C-tier studio would have created.The tone of these two shows are so dissimilar that invoking decay would be a pretty bad thing to do, in Amagi's case. It was fitting for what it was - sort of an interregnum between prosperity of the old and that promised in the future with kanye's arrival. It can be fixed up; there's hope for it still.
Now kanye's home was fugly:
satoshiroom.jpeg
mayakaroom.png
RIP
He also looks like a hobbit entering Bag End due to some fucked up perspective.
Not really? If you want to talk about modern Sunrise, the real reference point should be Gundam SEED.
For better and for worse, that had much more of an influence on the studio than Code Geass ever did.
Then again, it is basically a fallacy to assume that old-school Sunrise wasn't rather uneven too.
I would certainly agree that straight up decay wouldn't be the correct look, but it still seemed really sterile and dull. You're certainly right to single out his living room though, it looks like something a C-tier studio would have created.
Lay off the racism Lilith. You're a teacher!
Code Geass 01
Interesting yet silly premise. Let's see where this goes.
Wanted to try this at one time but I hear it gets bad after a while. + The character designs are Clannad level of atrocious.
Kyousougiga ONA's 1-5
While watching this old ass and long PV for KG, I realised with dread that I haven't seen a large number of those cuts. The duel, the chess game, few shots of that mysterious rabbit and more. Having already watched the episode 0 which, as I take it, is pretty much the original ONA. I went for the 5 short episodes that were released later. And unfortunately, no sight of scenes that caught my attention in the PV. Oh well. It's clear there were some major rewrites in the story as thefight is nowhere to be found in the TV show if I recall correctly. They changed Aramata's origin too. The 5 eps served later as the groundwork for first 5 episodes of the 2013 series. Sans some short cuts that didn't make it. Overall the TV show is the version to see with episode 0 to be watched after finishing it or at least after episode 6.Inari vs Lady Koto
That's how they explain all the stuff Okabe has to do.Wait,who said Mayuri's death is connected to SERN-controlled future? I don't see why you can't have another timeline where SERN controls the future but Mayuri is alive.
I guess it's a form of sekai-kei? If I'm getting the idea of sekai-kei right? ... And if there is an agreed-upon definition of sekai-kei in the first place?it still kind of irks me that it's basically an 8 character universe.
I've seen the movie, but that's not how I remember it. I seem to rememberWhile it is a bit contrived in that way, have you seen The butterfly Effect? Same idea.
Similarly, no matter what someone did in that movie there was always one predetermined outcome on that set of timelines that had to happen no matter what the person did to try to change it.
I'd put it somewhere with Back to the Future: as a time travel story, it has some serious holes, but it still manages to be fairly engaging if you choose not to think too hard about the SF aspect.I'll admit from what I've seen so far, the show's definitely not perfect. If I thought really hard about it, I probably could point out many flaws with its time-travel shenanigans.
But even so, I think the concept in of itself is interesting and the conflict that happens later on with Okabe and the dilemma that most of the side characters go through is effective enough to carry the show.
It seems a lot of people do that, and I think that's unfortunate. Although, considering how writers (especially in movies and on TV) generally handle the material, I can certainly understand why the bar has been lowered...I generally use the rule of thumb that if time travel/dimension hopping is introduced as a plot element or is a major plot element not to think about it too much as there will always be plot holes in time travel/dimension hopping stories. This is true not just for anime but for manga, games, movies, books, etc.
So, I decided to flick through Cross Ange 01. I want to see if this show really is Fukuda at his SEED-iest. A few things...
- It looks like a Fukuda trainwreck. The first episode does not give me a good impression at all. It could be deliberate. I want to believe that Cross Ange is setting up all this awful shit so the show does a complete 180, plot-wise and turns out to be good, and people praise it as the second coming of Code Geass S1. .
Haven't done this before and it seems to be a big thing around here lately but...does anyone fancy doing a watchbet with me? I promise I won't let you watch a terrible show!
Enclosing my MAL for good measure.
I don't know..... what show did you have in mind betting people? :]
They are completely wrong about Seven Deadly Sins.mHearing people describe The Seven Deadly Sins as a budget Fairly Tale is pretty hilarious considering people already describe Fairy Tale as budget One Piece.
[Steins;Gate]
That's how they explain all the stuff Okabe has to do.He's in an Attractor Field/group of timelines that leads to a SERN-controlled future... but also, for some reason, comes with Mayuri dying that one summer no matter what. The solution he's given? Going back to the original Attractor Field (where Kurisu is the one who dies... and we get World War 3 instead). And he does so by preventing the SERN-controlled future.
I guess it's a form of sekai-kei? If I'm getting the idea of sekai-kei right? ... And if there is an agreed-upon definition of sekai-kei in the first place?
Basically, all that complicated and muddy "real world stuff" that the audience (assumed to be relatively socially awkward?) doesn't know or care about is ignored altogether or merely a caricatural piece of cardboard (), and in the end everything will depend on the main character and his/her (but probably "his"!) relationship with the few members of his social circle anyway...SERN = absolutely evil part of the absolutely evil Committee of 300 that's always up to no good and that's all the exposition you need and get
I've seen the movie, but that's not how I remember it. I seem to rememberthere was no one predetermined outcome, just a protagonist changing history in order to try and "make things better" and finding out over and over again that he simply can't predict the long-term consequences (hence the title). Which always turned out to be horrible in the movie, yes, but in vastly different ways.
(... And until, in a reverse It's a Wonderful Life fashion, he reasons that his love interest would be better off had she never met him in the first place (or had he never been born, in the other ending), and bingo, that one works. Negativity saves the day!)
I'd put it somewhere with Back to the Future: as a time travel story, it has some serious holes, but it still manages to be fairly engaging if you choose not to think too hard about the SF aspect.
What's unfortunate is that Steins;Gate does put more emphasis on the science aspect than Back to the Future, and that sets higher expectations in that area...
It seems a lot of people do that, and I think that's unfortunate. Although, considering how writers (especially in movies and on TV) generally handle the material, I can certainly understand why the bar has been lowered...
The only time travel stories that come close to making sense are the ones where trying to change the past is futile. And even then, you can still end up with grandfather paradoxes.
Goldfish Warning! Episodes 1-46 + the Movie (21 mins) or Ojamajo Doremi the choice is yours.
The only time travel stories that come close to making sense are the ones where trying to change the past is futile. And even then, you can still end up with grandfather paradoxes.