I'm not sure how that's relevant to a discussion about America.
Just pointing out that the US is far from unique in this instance.
I'm not sure how that's relevant to a discussion about America.
A comment on the article in the OP linked another article estimating there are 50,000 illegal Irish immigrants alone in the US? Damn. 50,000 is like estimated illegal immigrant count for all of Japan total, how are this many people living in the US undocumented?
It's most likely difficult to do legally in most countries.
Other countries aren't the United States. We're a nation of immigrants. People fled persecution to create this place.
Also, other places aren't the US or like the US. We're the biggest economic and military power in the world. For an intents and purposes, we are the center of the world. So other countries are irrelevant to this discussion.
I'll take the somewhat unpopular position, here on GAF, and somewhat agree. Well, sorta. I'm fine with the current interpretation of the 14th Amendment and I'm fine with it being changed.
My biggest concern, if you can call it that because I'm not concerned about illegal immigration, my biggest thing, about the whole immigration thing is that I think it need to make sense. Trump says not paying taxes makes him smart. It does. Having a child in the United States when you're from another country and taking advantage of our birthright citizenship also makes a person smart. Gaming the system is what America is fucking about. If a majority of Americans truly desire a change to the 14th Amendment and an end to "anchor babies," or whatever offensive term is used now, I can live with that but I think the mature thing to do is make that change first and then change the immigration policy. People with children here, like it or not, are now parent's of American citizens and breaking up families is a terrible thing to do. We shouldn't do it. All it does is puts that family in a worse place. So long as we have birthright citizenship people will try and take advantage of that. And I don't even mean that in a bad way. I would do the same damn thing. It's not even a damn loophole or anything, it's plain as day language so I don't even know if it's taking advantage of the system or gaming anything.
So I guess my stance is, ultimately I'm ok with or without birthright citizenship, but I'm against breaking up families of American citizens, so if we want to deport people change the 14th, if we don't want to change the 14th then we need to accept that as a result of that people will have kids over here and we should leave them and their families alone.
I'll take the somewhat unpopular position, here on GAF, and somewhat agree. Well, sorta. I'm fine with the current interpretation of the 14th Amendment and I'm fine with it being changed.
My biggest concern, if you can call it that because I'm not concerned about illegal immigration, my biggest thing, about the whole immigration thing is that I think it need to make sense. Trump says not paying taxes makes him smart. It does. Having a child in the United States when you're from another country and taking advantage of our birthright citizenship also makes a person smart. Gaming the system is what America is fucking about. If a majority of Americans truly desire a change to the 14th Amendment and an end to "anchor babies," or whatever offensive term is used now, I can live with that but I think the mature thing to do is make that change first and then change the immigration policy. People with children here, like it or not, are now parent's of American citizens and breaking up families is a terrible thing to do. We shouldn't do it. All it does is puts that family in a worse place. So long as we have birthright citizenship people will try and take advantage of that. And I don't even mean that in a bad way. I would do the same damn thing. It's not even a damn loophole or anything, it's plain as day language so I don't even know if it's taking advantage of the system or gaming anything.
So I guess my stance is, ultimately I'm ok with or without birthright citizenship, but I'm against breaking up families of American citizens, so if we want to deport people change the 14th, if we don't want to change the 14th then we need to accept that as a result of that people will have kids over here and we should leave them and their families alone.
They probably came here legally and overstayed their visas. Which is actually a bigger issue than border crossings.
Other countries aren't the United States. We're a nation of immigrants. People fled persecution to create this place.
Also, other places aren't the US or like the US. We're the biggest economic and military power in the world. For an intents and purposes, we are the center of the world. So other countries are irrelevant to this discussion.
Yeah I guess a lot of non-Americans view the situation as a bit odd because of the lack of an American lens to view it through.
Do you think there should be any requirement for becoming a US citizen then?
You guys can't decide international comparators are valid only when it suits your argument. Apart from the indigenous people, Canada, Australia and New Zealand are all countries of immigrants. Like most developed countries though they enforce their immigration laws to a greater extent than the US.
What does being the "economic and military power" of the world have to do with anything? Your social services are pretty shit btw.
It's like something out of V For Vendetta. 20 years, has a family of US born and raised kids... is there not a natural way of naturalisation in cases like this.. automatic even? Madness.
My small point would be that a person enjoying the benefits of citizenship unfairly when someone following the rules does not get that benefit is the difficult part to swallow.
The connection between the US having a minimal welfare state and its minimal immigration enforcement is an interesting thought. Would people trade jus soli for universal health care and a larger social safety net? Would there be such an aversion for greater social programs?You guys can't decide international comparators are valid only when it suits your argument. Apart from the indigenous people, Canada, Australia and New Zealand are all countries of immigrants. Like most developed countries though they enforce their immigration laws to a greater extent than the US.
What does being the "economic and military power" of the world have to do with anything? Your social services are pretty shit btw.
Just pointing out that the US is far from unique in this instance.
I respect and appreciate your viewpoint. My small point would be that a person enjoying the benefits of citizenship unfairly when someone following the rules does not get that benefit is the difficult part to swallow.
Also, tax minimization is not illegal. Tax evasion is. Trump is not evading taxes, he is using legal framework to reduce them. The same way every single person does. Illegal immigration on the other hand is illegal and there should be no positive benefit from it, for anyone.
As an aside this whole "nation of immigrants" thing always seems really racist to me. You live alongside the Native American people - suggesting America is a nation of immigrants marginalises them completely.
I mean this seems like a sensible option which is why it's not being implemented.It's a weird situation it seems in the US where people *are* there illegally, but enforcement has been so low that to crack down now seems rough.
At the same time, without any kind of amnesty in place, it is the law. Perhaps a pass for people who can prove they have been there for 10 years without any significant convictions (e.g. not one-off DUIs).
Right, I agree. And it somewhat stems from the 14th Amendment. Like I said, I don't mind it either way, I'm not one bit concerned about immigrants taking jobs or committing crimes or anything of that nature, I'm totally fine with it staying exactly as it is, but a very large reason we don't deport people is because they have kids, which are American citizens, and splitting up a family is bad economically, ethically and optically. So lots of people stay and build normalish lives. Just to become pawns later down the line and have their lives upended again. Like this guy.I don't think most people would be complaining if they caught people who just got here illegally got deported, or people who actually committed serious crimes, but tossing out people like this is just harmful to the US as a whole and quite frankly, pretty goddamn evil.
I respect and appreciate your viewpoint. My small point would be that a person enjoying the benefits of citizenship unfairly when someone following the rules does not get that benefit is the difficult part to swallow.
Also, tax minimization is not illegal. Tax evasion is. Trump is not evading taxes, he is using legal framework to reduce them. The same way every single person does. Illegal immigration on the other hand is illegal and there should be no positive benefit from it, for anyone.
Are we having a racism off? Or are you just venting in are thread about a father being arrested in front of his children?
Oh no I just think people need to stop using that term. It's incredibly insensitive.
EDIT: my google fu is weak
And this is the thread you decided to go on that tangent?
As an aside this whole "nation of immigrants" thing always seems really racist to me. You live alongside the Native American people - suggesting America is a nation of immigrants marginalises them completely.
It's too late. Native Americans were already marginalized a long time ago.
Wow. Really dude?
Remember: they only become derails if you help out
Please do not fall for the troll's red herring.
It was used in this thread so it's valid to call it out.
As an aside this whole "nation of immigrants" thing always seems really racist to me. You live alongside the Native American people - suggesting America is a nation of immigrants marginalises them completely.
NoRéN;231397519 said:Shit sucks and everything but I wonder how many of you actually live in the neighborhoods being cracked down on.
NoRéN;231397519 said:Shit sucks and everything but I wonder how many of you actually live in the neighborhoods being cracked down on.
Should just reply, "If you think 9/11 was bad were you living in NYC or DC? No? Then what do you know?"Should people only be allowed to think this is bad if they live near the people being rounded up?
We can't just say "Yeah it sucks that this guy who posed no threat was ripped away from his family, but don't forget Native Americans!"
As an aside this whole "nation of immigrants" thing always seems really racist to me. You live alongside the Native American people - suggesting America is a nation of immigrants marginalises them completely.
I don't get it.Thats not what I said at all
Should just reply, "If you think 9/11 was bad were you living in NYC or DC? No? Then what do you know?"
NoRéN;231397519 said:Shit sucks and everything but I wonder how many of you actually live in the neighborhoods being cracked down on.
1/3 years is a long time for the short term memory of voters and 2016 taught us that expecting people to vote for non self interests because of empathy is a folly. At best this will get some Hispanic potential voters that were apathetic in 2016 to start voting now, and maybe a few sympathizers. The rest is going to need a better plan to be swayed.EDIT: No, i'm better than that.
It's terrible that this happened, but if any slimmer of good comes out of this it's that this country has seen how truly terrible this presidency is and they vote accordingly in 2018/2020.
First off, "illegal" is incorrect terminology. Undocumented immigrants are not criminals for being undocumented. The case is a civil one, not a criminal one. You're falling for political rhetoric by using the "illegal" misnomer.
It's a weird situation it seems in the US where people *are* there illegally, but enforcement has been so low that to crack down now seems rough.
At the same time, without any kind of amnesty in place, it is the law. Perhaps a pass for people who can prove they have been there for 10 years without any significant convictions (e.g. not one-off DUIs).
Slave patrolmen were just following orders too.Yeah let's blame the workers for the directives given from their superiors. I guess all the ICE workers should just quit right? I mean, who cares about the families they are trying to support, they are all just scum.
Everyone's blaming ICE but surely they're just shmucks doing what they can to make a living, just like the chap in the OP who illegally entered the US. They're only doing it because that's what the law tells them to. If you want a giant amnesty, or to effectively have an open door immigration policy, then you'll need to pass legislation to that effect, not simply expect ICE to selectively interpret the law that exists, no?