DontBeThatGuy
Member
I'd like to see this get some exposure on CNN and places like that, come on.
I never said one way or another. I don't care what you call it, I just find it funny how the #1 thing you guys seem to care about is what to label it.
Re-read my post, you didn't get it. I even prefaced it by saying it was a planned attack motivated by xenophobia but that's not good enough for you regressives.
I never said one way or another. I don't care what you call it, I just find it funny how the #1 thing you guys seem to care about is what to label it.
Re-read my post, you didn't get it. I even prefaced it by saying it was a planned attack motivated by xenophobia but that's not good enough for you regressives.
Words have meaning and it's important to use them correctly.
Oh.
"regressives."
You're one of those.
Re-read my post, you didn't get it. I even prefaced it by saying it was a planned attack motivated by xenophobia but that's not good enough for you regressives.
They are facing domestic terrorism charges, so there isn't much of a debate to be had here, and we can now move on from the too numerous shit posts.
Underrated commentWell they do both have a lot of white vans
I await white country club leaders to properly condemn this.
Said Eric Jackson, FBI Kansas City special agent in charge, "These individuals had the desire, the means, the capability to carry out this act of domestic terrorism."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/10/14/three-kansas-men-arrested-terrorism-plot/92094694/Christians has a responsibility to turn these people on. Christians need to report what they are seeing.
A confidential source attended meetings of The Crusaders and told the FBI about the men's plans, the DOJ said.
Christians has a responsibility to turn these people on. Christians need to report what they are seeing.
A confidential source attended meetings of The Crusaders and told the FBI about the men's plans, the DOJ said.
They are facing domestic terrorism charges, so there isn't much of a debate to be had here, and we can now move on from the too numerous shit posts.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/10/14/three-kansas-men-arrested-terrorism-plot/92094694/
Jesus fucking Christ people the Kansas City SAIC called them terrorists, are you all fucking happy now?
They are terrorists
They are facing domestic terrorism charges, so there isn't much of a debate to be had here, and we can now move on from the too numerous shit posts.
Clearly it was the atheist militias..
I now await links to hundreds of atheist militias..
The Deplorables appear to be watching the #KansasPlot hashtag; I tweeted with it and have already been attacked by 3 separate jerks.
🤔The men, who were arrested in Liberal on Friday morning
Because not calling terrorist actions by white people terrorism is one of the many, many, many...ways our society tries to lessen the severity of these heinous actions when committed by white people when it comes to how they're perceived.
And it should be called out.
Because it's things like your post that allows terrorism to be defined solely as something muslims do.
It also reinforces a denial that they can be victims of terrorism.
Lol @ regressives wtf does that even mean in this context
Words have meaning and it's important to use them correctly.
Oh.
"regressives."
You're one of those.
Do you even know what the word 'xenophobia' means? I am guessing no because it has fuck all to do with religion.
THey tried to kill 120 people, I'm not sure how labeling that terrorism, or not, changes the severity of the that. I guess it depends on how organized you think they are, how many more like minded people there are that seem willing to do such a thing, if that is the case then I could definitely see it. This is the first incident, certainly on this level, that I've seen of a white extremists targeting Muslims. That's not to say that Muslims haven't had to deal with other BS on the day to day basis of course. Again, go ham and call it terrorism people are just going nuts in order to use it as some gotcha political point or something.
Nope..you're thinking of my Joan gif, dope. If you could quote me posting that gif 14 days in a row, I'll take a year ban. Ya won't. But I do LOVE being noticed..
Toodles..🙃
You don't understand jokes, do you?
They care because it's like labeling mass shootings as a mental health issue when it clearly isn't. Militia planning a shooting has a completely different connotation than Terrorist's plot foiled.I never said one way or another. I don't care what you call it, I just find it funny how the #1 thing you guys seem to care about is what to label it.
Re-read my post, you didn't get it. I even prefaced it by saying it was a planned attack motivated by xenophobia but that's not good enough for you regressives.
I never said one way or another. I don't care what you call it, I just find it funny how the #1 thing you guys seem to care about is what to label it.
Re-read my post, you didn't get it. I even prefaced it by saying it was a planned attack motivated by xenophobia but that's not good enough for you regressives.
It's disgusting how it's always a "militia" if they're white. This is a terrorist act. These people are terrorists. Avoiding the label only helps to give future Caucasian, domestic terrorists a pass.
what is a regressive?
Liberal who believes s/he is a progressive, however their ideas are backward, lacking enlightenment. Regressive's believe their ideas are forward thinking and evolutionary however the ideology lacks moral guidance, invoke divisiveness, and is plagued with narrow mindedness. The existence an alternate ideology is unacceptable to a regressive.
ISIS is just one big militia group
what is a regressive?
What is this, the 1990s? Domestic terrorism rearing its ugly head again. Abortion clinics, Olympics, etc. FBI buildings. This is the shit Trump is bringing back.
How does that relate to your usage of the word in this specific thread, Artdayne?Maajid Nawaz explains it quite well in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=68&v=q2s_n6St1OI
His opening point is that there are some liberals that will not speak against bigotry in minority groups because of a desire to defend multiculturalism at all costs.
Maajid Nawaz explains it quite well in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=68&v=q2s_n6St1OI
His opening point is that there are some liberals that will not speak against bigotry in minority groups because of a desire to defend multiculturalism at all costs.
Because not calling terrorist actions by white people terrorism is one of the many, many, many...ways our society tries to lessen the severity of these heinous actions when committed by white people when it comes to how they're perceived.
And it should be called out.