excelsiorlef
Member
What the hell happened in here?
The usual
What the hell happened in here?
Either the FBI is leaking directly to Trump advisor Mike Flynn, or Mike Flynn is making the FBI look bad by saying they are leaking to him.
https://twitter.com/RadioFreeTom/status/794269168954699776
https://twitter.com/AdamSerwer/status/794186359263084544?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
Not sure if you have never seen the new or anything but any sort of investigation has FBI sources etc saying shit they shouldn't to Pundits on all sidesEither the FBI is leaking directly to Trump advisor Mike Flynn, or Mike Flynn is making the FBI look bad by saying they are leaking to him.
https://twitter.com/RadioFreeTom/status/794269168954699776
https://twitter.com/AdamSerwer/status/794186359263084544?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
Sorry, America, see you in 30 years or so when the Supreme Court may be able to recover from 3 or 4 Trump nominations.
This is absurd and deeply saddening. I now firmly believe this pos is in a better position to be the next potus than her.
Yes.. but there's a line,She believed he was guilty and defended him anyway.Says a lot about her really, especially because of who she defended.
Apparently not. You only get a trial if attorneys think you're innocent or you find a stone cold assassin like Killary.Where does it say you have a right to legal counsel only if you're innocent? I was under the impression everyone was entitled to a legal defense.
Sorry, America, see you in 30 years or so when the Supreme Court may be able to recover from 3 or 4 Trump nominations.
This is absurd and deeply saddening. I now firmly believe this pos is in a better position to be the next potus than her.
Yes.. but there's a line,She believed he was guilty and defended him anyway.Says a lot about her really, especially because of who she defended.
Sorry to harp on this point even further, but if you're mad that a child molester was not found guilty despite later being revealed that he was, then your anger should be with the prosecution (who in this case mishandled evidence), rather than the person who was legally required to provide a defense.
I wouldn't be surprised if Giuliani was directly involved with this whole New York field office mess.Seems Rudy may have know about the FBI reviewing the emails prior to them going public about it.
Starts an minute 1.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEO7HuDNSvw
I'm not sure how your system works but either way it's strait up shitty, I only heard it in the 3rd debate and I see what's happened this election.
Where does it say you have a right to legal counsel only if you're innocent? I was under the impression everyone was entitled to a legal defense.
It's not shitty, it's essential.
![]()
He doesn't believe in due process. Neither does Trump.
I'm not sure how your system works but either way it's strait up shitty, I only heard it in the 3rd debate and I see what's happened this election.
Come now. Trump is the Law and Order candidate. Why next you'll be telling me he thinks innocent men, exonerated by DNA evidence, should still be in jail.
This is why debating trump supporters is difficult. You can't use reason or facts. I have pretty much given up trying to discuss things like this with Trump supporters/hillary haters that I know. It's frustrating but you can't force someone to not be an idiot
The Brexit myth lives on.
The polls werent wrong about Brexit, and Hillary is winning by too much in polls for it to be within margin of error.