SallyIsNow
Banned
Yeah. It's great.Is that the one where he says he can get more money somewhere else? That's the only one coming to mind
Yeah. It's great.Is that the one where he says he can get more money somewhere else? That's the only one coming to mind
The issue is they weren't only kicking out in their Mania matches.
They were tiny feather-men so it made sense that they couldn't generate the same force as the heavyweights. Maybe you should pick up a book once in a while, Man God.WCW Cruiserweights are funny. They're the ones that really push the whole kick out of other people's finishers, use other people's big spots as set up moves mainstream, and everyone loved it so it became the indie style. I'm watching some of these matches with multiple avalanche power bombs, Tombstones, running powerbombs, Hurricanranas, etc, etc, and they don't end until someone does their super duper finisher off of the top.
Even in the WWE people usually don't kick out of Finisher unless it a big match or on a big show.I wonder how you go back to one finisher being the end of the match? It'd be better for the long haul, but it seems like it would be jarring in the short term. I mean Styles kicked out of what 4 AAs then it took the super AA to win?
RVD is a guy who, in hindsight, I have no idea why I liked. He didn't have good mic skills. His move set was surprisingly limited. And he didn't have much of a character outside of the R V D taunt. But he did a neat frog splash and had that move where he kicked a chair into a guys face.
For context - my only exposure to RVD is WWE
I wonder how you go back to one finisher being the end of the match? It'd be better for the long haul, but it seems like it would be jarring in the short term. I mean Styles kicked out of what 4 AAs then it took the super AA to win?
You can always go back. WWE went back to PG, abandoned blood, left the worst parts of their sexist product behind, etc. They can -- and should -- go back to simpler wrestling matches. It'll make the special stuff guys pull off all the time actually seem special when they do it.I wonder how you go back to one finisher being the end of the match? It'd be better for the long haul, but it seems like it would be jarring in the short term. I mean Styles kicked out of what 4 AAs then it took the super AA to win?
Rock Austin WM X-7 is the usual suspect, though there have been other historic no sellers like Warrior/Macho Man where he drops the elbow seven times and can't keep him down.
Yep, people need to go back to that, or agree to super finishers that no one kicks out of like the Punt, the 3D, Burning Hammer, top rope versions of your regular finisher, whatever.
I see nothing wrong with kicking out of finishers. It builds tension with both wrestlers, one determined to succeed and the it questions if the other has what it takes to win.
People desperately fighting out/dodging finishers is so much cooler than them taking it and kicking out at barely two.
I mentioned last night that I watched the DDP/Goldberg match at halftime and that has a great solution. Goldberg Spears DDP but he previously injured his shoulder so he can't get up fast. Tries to Jackhammer him but it's blocked, tries again and gets the Diamond Cutter out of nowhere. But DDP has been so badly abused all night that it takes him to an eight count to get over to make the cover, and Goldberg kicks out.
Today he would have covered Goldberg immediately instead of nearly thirty seconds later and the kick out would be meaningless. Back then it was a matter of being too drained to get over there in time.
HHH wasting no time
People desperately fighting out/dodging finishers is so much cooler than them taking it and kicking out at barely two.
I mentioned last night that I watched the DDP/Goldberg match at halftime and that has a great solution. Goldberg Spears DDP but he previously injured his shoulder so he can't get up fast. Tries to Jackhammer him but it's blocked, tries again and gets the Diamond Cutter out of nowhere. But DDP has been so badly abused all night that it takes him to an eight count to get over to make the cover, and Goldberg kicks out.
Today he would have covered Goldberg immediately instead of nearly thirty seconds later and the kick out would be meaningless. Back then it was a matter of being too drained to get over there in time.
This is how finisher kickouts should always be done. There should be a delay in getting the cover, then when you kick out it doesn't diminish the finisher.
.
This is how finisher kickouts should always be done. There should be a delay in getting the cover, then when you kick out it doesn't diminish the finisher.
Also, DDP should have ended the streak and became one of the top faces.
*Sigh*
I don't get how some Nintendo fans don't see how there's a clear problem with their console philosophy.
Besides Rock/Austin and some of the other usual suspects like Warrior/Macho I don't think finisher spam was really that big of a deal for a while...until the HBK/Taker match at Mania 25.
HHH wasting no me
*Sigh*
I don't get how some Nintendo fans don't see how there's a clear problem with their console philosophy.
Nope. Dudes are always kicking out of finishers through 2006. And I imagine it never lets up.
Tech wise?
I was just thinking the other day "this Chris Masters character is whatever, but I'm into this Masterlock business being a devastating finisher..."One of the few protected finishers in that era is hilariously enough the Master Lock.
Sad but true.Shouldn't really be called finishers now, maybe call them signature moves?
They're a company that's clearly behind the curve.
Show's KO punch is the most protected one, isn't it?
Show's KO punch is the most protected one, isn't it?
What is this??3 women's matches on one PPV is a bit much with this women's division.
i dont understand why the worlds laziest punch is so protected
Partially that, and Nintendo just has a philosophical approach to systems that seems to run counter to what consumers actively want these days. Part of their problem is that they like to pretend their competition doesn't exist, which is why they actively avoid going head to head with Sony anymore, when the reality is their competition is slapping them around the ring. People always cite "but the GameCube" as a reason for why Nintendo shouldn't go into a tech war with Playstation or Xbox anymore, but the GameCube was done under by a lot of other big problems - problems that mostly still linger with Nintendo today.
They're a company that's clearly behind the curve.
The dance people do to get out of the rainmaker is the best.Wrestlers dogding finishers or countering them > Wrestlers kicking out all the time any day of the week. A kick out should be once in a blue moon
RVD also has a great heel ECW character and is pretty good at selling. I'm always down for an RVD match. Plus his HBK impersonation is great.
I haven't been a Nintendo fan since the end of the Gamecube era. The lifespan of the Wii was certainly memorable in how it shook things up a bit and made them millions, but I can count on one hand the games that did anything for me. I won't even comment on the Wii U despite the fact I was in line day One. Iwata and Reggie as his NOA mouthpiece soured me on their reputation (I still think Reggie needs to be dropped like a bag of shit on someones front door...never to be seen again).
With that said , there is only so much a race over tech this and tech that can do. As a consumer, assuming all tech being equal, the only thing I then have to differentiate between the 3 consoles are the games. To that end, I think Nintendo agrees and continues to focus on keeping their game designers in the spot light. It makes sense. My only problem there is that they dropped the ball on keeping a healthy lineup of first party games coming out alongside some new IPs (Splatoon was, for me, their best game in years!). The thing about Nintendo games, no one designs games like they can. That is their selling point. Take to Twitch and watch any number of speedruns for games like Mario 64 or Mario Sunshine or whatever.
With that said, I love the idea of the Switch and love what Nintendo is doing on mobile. Fire Emblem Heroes is so fucking great and was the first time I have ever put down hard cold $ into a f2p game. I imagine with that extra revenue coming in, they'll get caught up soon enough but they need the money. I'm hoping and feel they'll win me back as a fan this go around. At least that's my hope.