Is the spear the most protected move ever?
Cena kicked out of one immediately after an entire Elimination Chamber when Edge cashed in
Is the spear the most protected move ever?
I'm also very confused as to why they did Reigns/Bryan at all. It didn't help either guy and it probably pissed people off Re: Roman more
Okay, two things on this beautiful Monday morning:
1. Having seen footage now, the Act vs. Yoshiko thing looks like a stiff work to me.
2. Seeing people say "Daniel Bryan should have kicked out of the spear because Roman Reigns kicked out of the Shining Wizard" makes me realize that WWE has conditioned their audience very well with their terrible 50/50 booking style in which nobody really looks strong because everyone gets a chance to win.
Yeah, I think that was the idea. The reality was that it showed that Roman can be carried through a decent match. Lesnar/Roman is going to stink.
They aren't doing that match because HHH needs his ego fed, probably.
Cena kicked out of one immediately after an entire Elimination Chamber when Edge cashed in
Okay, two things on this beautiful Monday morning:
2. Seeing people say "Daniel Bryan should have kicked out of the spear because Roman Reigns kicked out of the Shining Wizard" makes me realize that WWE has conditioned their audience very well with their terrible 50/50 booking style in which nobody really looks strong because everyone gets a chance to win.
If one person is allowed to kick out of finishers then I want both people to be allowed to kick out of finishers. Otherwise there should be no kicking out of finishers, period.
Is there anything that would really satisfy anyone though? They're not telling you how you're supposed to react, they're telling you the reason they're having the match.Did you listen to Cole's commentary after the match? "Reigns has redeemed himself, proved he is the one to main event WM, etc". If you want to know the intended reaction, the commentary always spells out out how you are "supposed" to react.
Basically they somehow thought this would satisfy everyone that thinks Reigns is rubbish and make them fans.
Either way I fully believe Roman does not leave WM31 with the title. Either Brock is going to win (if he re-signs) or Roman will beat Brock and then Rollins will immediately cash on and beat him.
They aren't doing that match because HHH needs his ego fed, probably.
It's one thing to be proud of yourself for winning a fight. It's another thing entirely to just start punching a person in the face who is considerably smaller than you when they're not really expecting it. Pathetic.
Also, give this shit a rest. Taker-Sting isn't happening because it doesn't make any sense to do it this year. Who wins that match? Does Sting lose his debut, or does Taker lose two in a row? If Taker is 21-2, then both guys that beat him are less valuable than if it is just one. Next year, that match will make sense. This year, it doesn't. Get the dumb ego argument out.
Is there anything that would really satisfy anyone though? They're not telling you how you're supposed to react, they're telling you the reason they're having the match.
I didn't see the show last night. I went to go see Roseanne do stand up. Overall, how was the show? Worth watching some of the matches on the Network?
If one person is allowed to kick out of finishers then I want both people to be allowed to kick out of finishers. Otherwise there should be no kicking out of finishers, period.
I agree with this. It really weakens the one person if his finisher is kicked out of and he can't kick out of his opponent's. Personally, I think kicking it of finishers should be a very, very rare occurence anyway.
Do you guys think Id get in trouble at work if I made Val Venis' theme my ringtone?
Punk never gets his mania main event but Reigns gets one after being carried by Bryan.
But in a one-on-one contest, one wrestler SHOULD be weaker than the other wrestler. That's how pro wrestling worked before WWE conditioned their audience to have an "any given night" mentality. That's how you make stars. Hawk no-selling Lawler's piledriver is a good example.
Two more things:
1) nobody ever gave a shit about Undertaker vs. Sting until idiot fans misread a vignette and worked themselves into believing they want that match.
2) I guarantee you that Yoshiko will get "fired," then Act will campaign to rehire her so that she can get her revenge in a no ropes barbed wire match.
That's fair. You're right, one wrestler should be strong and one should be weak. I'm still of the mind that kicking out of someone's finisher should still be very rare and saved for special & important matches.
WWE has hyped up the idea of Sting vs Taker multiple times in the past and built the two up as huge cornerstones of their respective companies (there's even a Monday Night War episode dedicated purely to those two), Sting has also said he wants to face Taker. Suddenly HHH comes in and starts a WWE vs WCW feud with Sting and proclaims that he is the absolute embodiment of WWE. This has HHH ego masturbation all over it.
Sting vs Taker is the absolute best match to have as a follow up for Undertaker's first Mania loss because of the massive unpredictability of it.
Don't you think that Roman Reigns vs. Daniel Bryan was a special and important enough match to do that?
My predicted Mania card so far
Roman Reigns vs Brock Lesnar (c) - WWE Title
Sting vs HHH
Seth Rollins vs Randy Orton
Undertaker vs Bray Wyatt
The Usos vs Cesaro/Kidd (c) - Tag Titles
Dean Ambrose vs Bad News Barrett (c) - Intercontinental Title
John Cena vs Rusev (c) - US Title
Daniel Bryan vs Shaemus
Stardust vs Goldust
Paige vs Nikki Bella - Divas Title
Andre The Giant Memorial Battle Royal #2
I want to put Miz vs Mizdow on here but I think that might be a Raw after Mania type thing
That's also very possible.
Don't you think that Roman Reigns vs. Daniel Bryan was a special and important enough match to do that?
Nobody in their right mind would think Sting vs Taker would be a match worth a shit.
Nobody in their right mind would think Sting vs Taker would be a match worth a shit.
Nobody in their right mind would think Sting vs Taker would be a match worth a shit.
Nobody in their right mind would think Sting vs Taker would be a match worth a shit.
so, does HHH beat Sting to complete the burial of WCW?
I really have no interest in Sting or Undertaker being at this year's Mania. I really don't.
Better than Taker vs Husky Harris
No? When's the last time HHH won a match?
I'm not saying the match doesn't make sense. It just doesn't make sense for this year. It would be bad booking. And probably a terrible match. It makes way more sense to do it next year in Dallas as a retirement match for both. Stop with the dumb Triple H hate. I'm all for tearing him down when he deserves it, and this is absolutely not one of those times.
so, does HHH beat Sting to complete the burial of WCW?
No? When's the last time HHH won a match?
I wonder if WWE commentary would improve if they didn't know the finishes? Maybe they would be more invested in the match or get excited for big spots.