Snake29
Banned
It's not on Game Pass or any other subscription service.
Do you think now it's a good measure?
Final Fantasy is a way more casual game in general which could easily sell more then Starfield which will be on Gamepass day one.
It's not on Game Pass or any other subscription service.
Do you think now it's a good measure?
It actually could because of gamepass, but considering how big Skyrim and fallout are, it could still sell 10 million despite being on gamepass….. idk if FF XVI will sell beyond what XV did, hopefully it does but it depends on marketing post launchFinal Fantasy will end up selling more than Starfield.
It already did in physical sales which is kind of impressive to be honest, or perhaps bad for Diablo 4.
I would imagine Diablo got a lot of digital sales on the 5th platform (PC) though so you'd be right that it probably has no chance overall.
Sure but it's not like FF16 has no digital sales.Its 2023, winning in physical sales is like winning in the the special olympics.
![]()
90% of video game sales in 2022 were digital
Apparently, 90% of video game sales in 2022 were digital. So, where does this leave the future of physical media?www.gamebyte.com
This is a tough call. Microsoft effectively handicapped Starfields customer base in half by making it console exclusive to Xbox. To put this in perspective, Skyrim (an established franchise) sold over 60 million copies as a multi-platform release spanning multiple generations.Final Fantasy is a way more casual game in general which could easily sell more then Starfield which will be on Gamepass day one.
What a title lol, The game actually seems to be performing very poorly.
It's pretty much a given that it will since most XBOX users will play Starfield via Gamepass.It would be a crime if this became true. There's less than a 1% chance this becomes true.
Based on his post history.based on what evidence?
anecdotally, my PSN friends list is lit up with people playing FF16. Haven't seen it this in favor of a single game since God of War Ragnarok.
Physical only #'s
based on what evidence?
anecdotally, my PSN friends list is lit up with people playing FF16. Haven't seen it this in favor of a single game since God of War Ragnarok.
Physical only #'s
Btw, FFXV and FF7R aren't good ways to compare to 16, because one was shown and hyped for like, almost 10 years, please remember versus XII and the other is a remake of the most popular title in the franchise
That you need the digital results of Diablo 4 and those of FFXVI to draw conclusions but, apparently, that doesn't matter to open threads like this...
Ragnarok was around 145,000How does this compare to ragnarok?
only diamonds are forever.In addition I strongly believe that if sqaure said it was a fully playstation exclusive forever it would be alot higher. It wasn't safe that xv would get a pc version at the time and especially not that fast.
If the game had released on PC at launch it would have been far higher as well, assuming a decent PC version that is. There is a rather large FF fanbase on PC considering FF14.In addition I strongly believe that if sqaure said it was a fully playstation exclusive forever it would be alot higher. It wasn't safe that xv would get a pc version at the time and especially not that fast.
What a title lol, The game actually seems to be performing very poorly.
If it's that long it will hurt pc sales. Should have launched day one.Anecdotal but I know two people who want to play it but don't have a PS5. I imagine PC sales will be healthy too since yoshi-p won't skimp on port quality (I assume it will be 12-18 months down the road)
Your argument doesn't make sense, XV had action combat and awful action combat at that. XVI combat is far more engaging and polished.I blame the combat system. Time to go back to turn based combat ASAP.
Turn based would sell even less..I blame the combat system. Time to go back to turn based combat ASAP.
Seriously, this thread is totally misleading
so....is one of those things you can use to fit the narrative you like?