GHG
Member
Why not just release a day 1 patch if it's not perfect?
Square Enix is weird.
Since when were day 1 patches magical fixes?
Why not just release a day 1 patch if it's not perfect?
Square Enix is weird.
Yeah you'll be waiting for a year or two after launch. Good luck not getting spoiled for story by then.
OT, Its fine if the combat is smooth and fps outside of that not a stuttery mess. Also good to have confirmation that we have a 60fps mode.
You think it's going to be locked on PC?
Probably lower dev time. The extra juice lets them skimp on optimization.I'm really baffled where all these extra resources are going considering games barely look any better than last gen in performance mode.
You are an ignorant.30 fps is dog shit .. good that you liked.. now fuck off pretending your opinion matter most then other opinions as usual on topics that mention 30 fps , pro consoles and forspoken that piece of shit game
Exactly this. This is what having powerful consoles really means.Probably lower dev time. The extra juice lets them skimp on optimization.
what the big deal about 40 fps mode?
is it that much smoother than 30 to be worth it?
Please someone explain to me
what the big deal about 40 fps mode?
is it that much smoother than 30 to be worth it?
Please someone explain to me
30 fps is dog shit .. good that you liked.. now fuck off pretending your opinion matter most then other opinions as usual on topics that mention 30 fps , pro consoles and forspoken that piece of shit game
Hopefully the PC Port will run fine.It will run great when I get it on Steam at 50% off in a few years.
Let me stay on topic and not address the shenanigans going on here. He is doing what Yoshi P does which really isn't good for game developers and being too fucking honest. He didn't say it would drop from 60 to 30 anywhere in the interview he's talking about one-off drops and occasionally. The game was done last year and has been polished since.
Some of the questions the FF team get asked in the interviews are tiresome. 3 years of repeating the same questions about it being an action game, or about exclusivity, or diversity...Yeah Yoshi-P is refreshingly honest, even to a fault. But I always appreciate it.
Game development has to be one of the most stressful jobs. Work ungodly fucking hours on a single project for years, and then get endless emotional abuse from gamers.
It might have to do with the Decima engine being easier to optimize 60fps for?Strange that the incredible power of ps5 can't run this thing at 60 frames but it can run the vastly better looking hfw at 60...
30 fps is dog shit .. good that you liked.. now fuck off pretending your opinion matter most then other opinions as usual on topics that mention 30 fps , pro consoles and forspoken that piece of shit game
IMO 40fps on OLED needs BFI. Then it’s tolerable. But the hit in HDR and loss of VRR is not worth it for me so 60fps it is whenever possible.No is not .... is smother but not near close to the 60 fps experience .... people will say is the second coming of jesus the savior of slowass fps ...but at least to my eyes on a Oled screen 40 fps is just what it is .. 30 fps a little better.
Tested on Horizon FW and RaC Rift apart and went back to the 60 fps mode without looking back.
Someone mention in another thread that 40 fps for oled is the 30 fps mode for Led screens, because 30 fps on oled is broken. Its a good comparison
Since when were day 1 patches magical fixes?
Yep, pretty satisfying. They even had to change my tag after I embarrassed them
aye man have you played the un-patched Callisto Protocol? that shit went through some major tweaks for the launch patch.
It was still shit at launch on PC and Xbox even with the patch.
Don't see many 'meltdowns', but there are predicable reactions in here, using it as platform to console war.again ppl having meltdowns ( like in SM3 thread ) and the game inst even out yet, chill out, at least wait for DF Review on this.
We still have no indication what sacrifices they have made on resolution, draw distance and foliage for performance mode, but hopefully the upcoming demo will make things clearer.But if it's cutting a lot of things like Plague Tale: Requiem's Performance mode, then there might be something to sticking to the Quality mode.
Also, a 40hz option would be nice too.
Youtubers who Played the demo for 4 hours, was saying 60fps in combats, 30-40 in explorationoh no the frame counter said 52 during the df analysis video at 3 minutes 14 seconds yeah gonna pass
The only YouTuber that said this was Max. Unless you have seen another one everyone else said the performance was very good. It is also already known that they played an older build and not everyone played the same build.Youtubers who Played the demo for 4 hours, was saying 60fps in combats, 30-40 in exploration
A lot of YouTubers were saying the console version of Jedi Survivor was locked 60fps but the reality is that it drops to the 30s. Many wouldn't know their arse from their elbow so better to wait for performance reviews if that sort of thing bothers you.The only YouTuber that said this was Max. Unless you have seen another one everyone else said the performance was very good. It is also already known that they played an older build and not everyone played the same build.
By the time it gets to 50% off it should be fine.Hopefully the PC Port will run fine.
It might be a translation/language thing, but it sounds more like it'll be 60fps out of combat with some dips... or I could be totally wrong lolI don't get what the issue is here.
If the game holds 60fps during combat where it's important, then what does it matter if it drops to 30fps out of combat?
This game is basically DMC with RPG mechanics, playing this at 30fps….It might be a translation/language thing, but it sounds more like it'll be 60fps out of combat with some dips... or I could be totally wrong lol
Back to 30fps tho... I think 30fps can be acceptable, we seen that recently but the game has to be exceptional, but it's the switching from 60fps then to 30fps then back to 60fps that will be the issue. I've tried it with a few games, just to see what it would look like... and I tell you switching from performance to res, then back again is pretty jarring, at least initially. I imagine one could get used to res mode eventually, but If that's happening constantly it might turn players off... 60 to 30 is a big gap.
We dont, the ps5 and series x are plenty capable when in the right hands. Garbage like jedi survivoe or this are outliers. Also, doesnt matter how pro your console is, in the end, consoles will always be primarily 30 fps machines as graphical ambitions continue to grow. If you want high framerates and resolutions without sacraficing one, then get a pcWhat the fuck.
And people say we dont need pro consoles.
Not only max, I remember other who said looked as 40fps. The point developer told us this is because the framerate out of combat will be unstable. Probably they are dropping aggressive resolution in combatsThe only YouTuber that said this was Max. Unless you have seen another one everyone else said the performance was very good. It is also already known that they played an older build and not everyone played the same build.
we will seeNot only max, I remember other who said looked as 40fps. The point developer told us this is because the framerate out of combat will be unstable. Probably they are dropping aggressive resolution in combats
Start panicking………………………................................................................................................................NOW!No need to panic juuust yet
In 99% of cases I agree. But TotK patch was magic according to DF. A rare case of day 1 patch making a difference.Since when were day 1 patches magical fixes?
Are they?We dont, the ps5 and series x are plenty capable when in the right hands. Garbage like jedi survivoe or this are outliers.