dakkumauji
Member
I was trying to get a birthday event but my FE game hates me so I guess here's just Owain showing who's boss over the 3DS.
So Happy Birthday, best character!
Somewhere else I saw people talking about starting Fire Emblem GBA again and now I'm itching to play it. I don't know where my copy is though :<
you already know Path of Radiance and Radiant Dawn are better, Lunar15
Then again, it's not like number of reps equals a healthy franchise. Look at Star Fox.
FE GBA Hard mode actually changed some of the levels. The desert ones adding sandstorms meaning you couldn't see far around stands out the most to me. Don't think any of the other FEs in the U.S. have changed around entire strategies for a level in Hard mode like that since.
who cares
Radiant Dawn still has better map variety, also fog of war is bullshit anyway
how about a room full of dragon laguz
done
When you got op units, it's nice to see them wrecking stuff.When you get to the endgame tower in Radiant Dawn, it's like the creators just threw up their hands and said "Well, let's just throw fucking everything at the player."
I love it.
When you got op units, it's nice to see them wrecking stuff.
how about a room full of dragon laguz
done
I'm super glad that a lot of people like FE in this thread. However, this is a smash bros thread, so I would like to take this opportunity to remind people that there is actually a Fire Emblem Community Thread.
IT DOESN'T GET ENOUGH LOVE ;_;
Welcome! This thread is a little slow at times....sometimes there's just not a lot of FE news to talke about. At the least the Smash presence gives it some life.
Your favorite FE games are some of my least favorite, but similar to you I like pretty much all of them so I can deal. And that's a really nice collection. I wish I had the means/willingness to collect stuff.
you don't really like FE8, 10, 13, 7, or 5...?
or am I reading this wrong
Well then...
Hi FireEmblemGAF! Since I've only recently been approved for membership, I haven't had time to post here. I suppose I'll tell you how I discovered Fire Emblem or something, since I really don't know what else I could say.
*awesome description of FE fandom*
my personal top 4 is Radiant Dawn, FE12 (I'm not typing that whole title out), Awakening, and Path of Radiance, probably in that order
FE7 for most overrated game
Any hope in bringing back the complex system in Thracia 776 and Genealogy of War?
Those two are my favorite Fire Emblem games, especially with the unique gameplay and difficulty that came with it.
I'd love to have a remake akin to the DS remakes of Marth's games since the Jugdral games deserve it.
Regardless I hope we get a more complex Fire Emblem after this past one.
I always thought it was weird that FE GBA decided to have a ten chapter tutorial of sorts and still not really manage to explain supports very well. Yeah yeah, you can't support in the early chapters, but it feels like a weird omission.
So I have a question about Fire Emblem Awakening...
Does it severely limit you on money the way previous FEs did?
I was playing a hard playthrough of FE:SS and backed myself into a corner by trying to level up characters in the Tower, but ended up running out of money to replace my weapons, and was unable to progress any further in the story.
Now in FE:A, is this the same type of situation, or should I play knowing I have a little more financial freedom?
Also does this FE have missable items if I don't get them on the first pass?
So I have a question about Fire Emblem Awakening...
Does it severely limit you on money the way previous FEs did?
I was playing a hard playthrough of FE:SS and backed myself into a corner by trying to level up characters in the Tower, but ended up running out of money to replace my weapons, and was unable to progress any further in the story.
Now in FE:A, is this the same type of situation, or should I play knowing I have a little more financial freedom?
Also does this FE have missable items if I don't get them on the first pass?
It might be hard to continue on the marriage system, since the plot has to be incredibly tied to it. However, increased rewards for having supports will probably stick around. It's one of the series best and most defining features, yet sometimes they would obscure it so much. Bringing it closer to the forefront is overall a great thing.
Everything about Awakening is ridiculously easy imo, at least to those who are veterans to the series.
Shadow Dragon a lot of people didn't care for the art style (at least compared to the GBA style), the story (well, it's an older game) and some weird design choices involving Gaiden chapters.
Shadow Dragon is going $50 used.
I thought the marriage system was pretty much "thrown in" in Awakening already. Lucina really doesn't have an important story role aside from one scene after her identity is revealed, and every other child is completely optional and have no roles at all in the main story.
The next game they could attempt to go for a main story that actually is tied to the marriage system in a big way, like FE4's was, with an actual timeskip for the 2nd generation, which would get their own time to become the story's protagonists.
not worth it x_x
not worth it x_x
Anyone trying playing FE:A just going from chapter to chapter? The game encourages grinding and class changing so much I wonder if playing it like a more traditional FE game could be done on the higher difficulties.
not worth it x_x
I said it in another thread, but man, now's the time to bring back 4 now that the marriage system is so popular. Of course, it wouldn't be all happy-go-lucky like Awakening can be at some times.
Also, I just realized that Awakening has no recruitment theme. Weird.
Is Shadow Dragon that bad?
me said:Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon. A game that is as Fire Emblem as you can get... if you are reading this in the 1990's. The game is a straight and faithful remake of the series first outing, "Dark Dragon and the Sword of Light", released for the Famicom in 1990. And that is where it's problems start: It is just as the game was in 1990. Sure, you have your Weapon Triangle now, sure, the graphics are a lot better than they were back then, but at the core, this is a early 90's game. If you are ok with that, then I cannot stress this enough: Buy this game. It is a good game all by itself, but it just fails in comparison to other Fire Emblem games. A lot of the features a Fire Emblem fan has gotten accustomed to are missing in this title. Character development is almost nonexistent, the story is incredibly linear and rather dull from today's perspective, and the beloved support conversations from the GameBoy Advance games are not here either, taking away the character's depth. Despite that, however, it is still quite enjoyable as a turn-based strategy game.
If you have ever played an other Fire Emblem, you should either be prepared to play something that feels pretty old, or you should want to dwelve into the franchises history. If you are interested in how it started, this is the way to go. If you look for a nice strategy game for the DS, this is the way to go. But if you think you get a high quality Fire Emblem with this game, you should probably stay away from it.
No, it does. It's just unlike most other recruitment themes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BOdqZjOTMs
Is Shadow Dragon that bad?
It's not that bad, but it feels outdated - I couldn't believe the requirements for recruiting new characters were to let your existing characters die. Fuck that, no-one is left behind (apart from Jagen).
It felt weird when I played it, like I could tell it was a Fire Emblem game, but not similar to the ones I was accustomed to. Plus the artstyle is a little ech.
That's horrible. What kind of requirement is that!?
In fairness, they introduce it very early on - you can't progress past the first chapter(?) unless you send someone to be a decoy and die. I assume it was in the very first game, and Shadow Dragon just recreates it faithfully.
Still nonsense mind, although I guess it sort of makes Ironman runs a little less tougher (since characters you lose can be replaced).