Society said:Funny thing is, most of the trolls are coming from the Sony camp.
Doesn't matter what camp they're coming from, it appears some people just simply don't like handhelds
Society said:Funny thing is, most of the trolls are coming from the Sony camp.
GoForce 4500 doesn't seem any more impressive than PSP graphics chips. It does wipe the floor with DS, though.Nvidia's GoForce 4500 appears to wipe the floor with both the DS and the PSP.
jarrod said:
Gek54 said:Burnout3 for PSP has already been confirmed.
haha, yeah, by that logic (judging solely on tech specs), there are no, and never will be, a good looking DS gamesLooks horrible. The only good looking PSP game so far is Coded Arms.
Why would Burnout on PSP not be online?But it's not online! I feel that would take too much away from the experience!!111!
Oh, but of course. Whatever is most convinient for you, CybaDifferent expectations
Marconelly said:Oh, but of course. Whatever is most convinient for you, Cyba
Hey, I have to earn this tag right there on the left!Marconelly, i don't think you've ever posted in a positive DS thread without mentioning PSP, or posted in a negative PSP thread (like this one) without somehow putting down the DS
So you're saying they should be judged equally? That people should disregard that PSP is significantly more powerful?Marconelly said:Oh, but of course. Whatever is most convinient for you, Cyba
ghostface said:Because Cyba is openly a Ninboy, while I've seen you try to make it look like you're unbiased.
Doesn't work very well though.
Haha, are you crazy, everyone knows I'm a Psyborg. Just maybe not as crazed as some other 'borgs and 'bots... The difference, I think, is that I really don't have anything against Nintendo or Microsoft. I don't hold any grudge against them. It's just that I prefer Sony's consoles and (of course) games it has to offer.Because Cybamerc is openly a Ninboy, while I've seen you try to make it look like you're unbiased.
Doesn't work very well though.
Sho Nuff said:I saw this running today. It had a LONG way to go. Very clunky, not smooth, and polys on the road kept dropping out (!).
Sho Nuff said:I saw this running today. It had a LONG way to go. Very clunky, not smooth, and polys on the road kept dropping out (!).
Chittagong, can you elaborate on this? What exactly was explicitly expressed in GDC?Although I recall that it was rather explicitly exressed in GDC this March at the PSP info session, I'm still surprised of low the polygon count for PSP seems to be. In logic it's not unlike N64 which had many advanced graphic features built in with "no performance hit" but had a crappy polygon rate.
Marconelly said:Chittagong, can you elaborate on this? What exactly was explicitly expressed in GDC?
Lost Weekend said:The response to this title is just like I predicted in some other thread about a month ago. If you buy a $300 handheld, you expect current gen graphics. If you don't get them, (because more detail causes a bigger performance hit which drains the battery or whatever excuse) you get pissed and question your investment. This could be a problem.
It is going to be more of a concern for game developers, as there already are games that deliver on the promise of looking simillar or even better in some ways than the simillar PS2 games.The response to this title is just like I predicted in some other thread about a month ago. If you buy a $300 handheld, you expect current gen graphics. If you don't get them, (because more detail causes a bigger performance hit which drains the battery or whatever excuse) you get pissed and question your investment. This could be a problem.
krypt0nian said:Totally with you there Lost. It makes too much sense.
The only game that looks "better" than what you find on PS2 is Coded Arms and apparently it doesn't look too hot IRL. It's also looks incredibly boring.Marconelly said:It is going to be more of a concern for game developers, as there already are games that deliver on the promise of looking simillar or even better in some ways than the simillar PS2 games.
Coded Arms, Hot Shots Golf, and RR are just some that pop to mind that at least in some way look better than their PS2 counterparts and look the same or simillar in other ways (and I'm talking actual comments from IGN and other people who played them in person) HSG has better image quality, RR and Coded Arms look simillar to the games of their kind on PS2...The only game that looks "better" than what you find on PS2 is Coded Arms and apparently it doesn't look too hot IRL. It's also looks incredibly boring.
But the IGN impressions also mentioned that the environments and character models had been downgraded. The PSP version also has spot shadows whereas the PS2 version has proper shadows. Besides, the PS2 games aren't that impressive to begin with.Marconelly said:(and I'm talking actual comments from IGN and other people who played them in person) HSG has better image quality
cybamerc said:But the IGN impressions also mentioned that the environments and character models had been downgraded. The PSP version also has spot shadows whereas the PS2 version has proper shadows. Besides, the PS2 games aren't that impressive to begin with.
kpop100 said:Guess chance of you buying a DS is nil if the PSP games don't even meet your standards graphically.
Different expectations.kpop100 said:Guess chance of you buying a DS is nil if the PSP games don't even meet your standards graphically.
If you are hyping something to death and it doesn't deliver, you should be prepare for the backlash.