First reviews for Trank's Fantastic Four hit.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fantastic 4 should be so fucking easy to write a film script for. They can go to space, under the sea, other dimensions. They can be superheros, explorers, adventurers, time travellers.

The sky is the limit and you have one of Marvels best villians to put against them.

HOW DO YOU KEEP FUCKING IT UP!!
 
"It's clobbering time" is something Ben Grimm's abusive brother used to say before he slapped him about. Comic book fans will love that.

I don't think a single movie fact has ever made me not want to see a movie so badly.

RT score now down to 13%..... Ouch.
 
I think I read somewhere that Marvel can take legal action against a studio if they use their properties in bad faith (ie making a shit film just to hold onto the rights). They'd have a good case here with Fox.
 
It'd be best if you guys don't. That is, if you want the Fantastic Four to not be done by Fox, anymore. I say this as someone who was hoping that this movie would pull through.

Well, the chances I'm seeing this are almost nil, so don't worry there. I only go to movies that I REALLY want to see, that my wife or daughter want to see, or that friends want to see. I don't see this movie fitting into any of those slots.
 
I think I read somewhere that Marvel can take legal action against a studio if they use their properties in bad faith (ie making a shit film just to hold onto the rights). They'd have a good case here with Fox.

Lol, ridiculous

Art is so subjective that this would not hold up in court at all. Maybe if it was direct to dvd and directed by uwe boll or some shit

As shit as this movie sounds some of you marvel guys are pretty corny with these fanboy posts. I trust neoxon is picketing his local theater right now...
 
Had a bad feeling about this movie for a while. Guess I'll let you guys know how bad it is tomorrow night.
If you want the F4 to be done right (I.E. by Marvel Studios), it'd be best if you avoid the movie. Granted, it's your choice, but I'm just giving my two cents.

That being said, F4 is at 22% on RT. The positive review was by Little White Lies.
David Jenkins of Little White Lies said:
Fantastic Four is a really good film, shorn of glib know-all theatrics, faux profundity and the spangly CG that's usually ushered in as dramatic short hand for, "we got nuthin'." It is, as the old saying goes, a proper movie.
I guess the name of the site is fitting.
 
If you want the F4 to be done right (I.E. by Marvel Studios), it'd be best if you avoid the movie. Granted, it's your choice, but I'm just giving my two cents.

That being said, F4 is at 22% on RT, but the 2nd positive review that they're referring to isn't showing up. On the side it's listed as 13%.

Ah, so it's a "give it back to Marvel" type reasoning. Sounds petty.
 
Keep in mind that I was hoping that Fox could pull through. This movie is proof that Fox doesn't know how to make a good Fantastic Four movie.

Does Marvel know how to make good super movies or meh super hero movies? Again it's petty. Should Marvel give up the rights to Thor? They've yet to make a good Thor movie. What about Iron Man? They've made 3 Iron Man movies and 2 were really, really average and borderline just bad.
 
Does Marvel know how to make good super movies or meh super hero movies? Again it's petty.
Guardians of the Galaxy & Winter Soldier alone prove that Marvel knows how to make good comic book movies. Marvel Studios has a great track record & are more than capable of getting the F4 right. Hell, they made Guardians of the Galaxy a household brand.

Meh is better than awful

most Marvel movies are pretty good, Ant-man being the best one this year.
Basically this.
 
Guardians of the Galaxy & Winter Soldier alone prove that Marvel knows how to make good comic book movies.

Which is weird reasoning since they have more than just those two movies. Thor 1, 2, Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2, 3, Captain America: The First Avenger, Age of Ultron.

Can Marvel give away these rights? They're clearly not competent films.
 
Guardians of the Galaxy & Winter Soldier alone prove that Marvel knows how to make good comic book movies.

1399681592682.gif
 
Which is weird reasoning since they have more than just those two movies. Thor 1, 2, Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2, 3, Captain America: The First Avenger, Age of Ultron.

Can Marvel give away these rights? They're clearly not competent film makers.
There's a difference between disappointing & bad. AoU was disappointing, but still pretty good. Thor 1 & Cap 1 were decent, Incredible Hulk was okay, & Iron Man 3 is better than most give it credit for. The only movies that you may have a point on are Thor 2 & Iron Man 2.

I don't see the problem.
 
Which is weird reasoning since they have more than just those two movies. Thor 1, 2, Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2, 3, Captain America: The First Avenger, Age of Ultron.

Can Marvel give away these rights? They're clearly not competent films.

Yeah, okay. So anyways...
Let's talk about older siblings and the abuse they inflict on their younger counterparts.
 
I feel bad that Michael B. Jordan is in this.
And Kate Mara.
And Miles Teller.

I'm not rooting for the movie to fail or anything but reading through some posts it hadn't dawned on me right away what consists of the FF universe and how awesome a lot of it would be in the MCU.
 
Which is weird reasoning since they have more than just those two movies. Thor 1, 2, Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2, 3, Captain America: The First Avenger, Age of Ultron.

Can Marvel give away these rights? They're clearly not competent films.

All of those are good movies, minus maybe the third being meh and iron man 2 being bad.

Fox has made 3 fantastic four movies and all of them were terrible.
 
I don't think I've ever seen a marvel movie in the mcu that was just plain terrible. The closest maybe was thor 2
It's pretty clear now that fox has no idea what they are doing with this franchise. Hell at least Sony made 2 good spiderman movies
 
Which is weird reasoning since they have more than just those two movies. Thor 1, 2, Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2, 3, Captain America: The First Avenger, Age of Ultron.

Can Marvel give away these rights? They're clearly not competent film makers.

Keeping up with the subpar posts i see Spatula.
 
All of those are good movies, minus maybe the third being meh and iron man 2 being bad.

Fox has made 3 fantastic four movies and all of them were terrible.

Even the MCU's subpar films like Iron Man 2, Incredible Hulk and Thor 2 are watchable and not horrible films.

Marvel Studios has not made a truly bad film yet.
 
There's a difference between disappointing & bad. AoU was disappointing, but still pretty good. Thor 1 & Cap 1 were decent, & Iron Man 3 is better than most give it credit for.

You would think people would be upset with disappointing movies but not with Marvel movies. This is why it's petty. Marvel movies, by their fandom, get a pass (just like any other fandom) so when you hear remarks regarding giving it back to Marvel it comes off as petty.

All of those are good movies, minus maybe the third being meh and iron man 2 being bad.

Fox has made 3 fantastic four movies and all of them were terrible.

Marvel has made 2 Thor movies and they were bad. Can Marvel give away the rights away already? This logic only goes one way: straight to Marvel.
 
I think I read somewhere that Marvel can take legal action against a studio if they use their properties in bad faith (ie making a shit film just to hold onto the rights). They'd have a good case here with Fox.

A studio doesn't spend $100M+ on a film with no expectations of success.
 
You would think people would be upset with disappointing movies but not with Marvel movies. This is why it's petty. Marvel movies, by their fandom, get a pass (just like any other fandom) so when you hear remarks regarding giving it back to Marvel just come off as petty.
And the reviews actually back it up. AoU got a 74% on RT & a Certified Fresh badge, none of which are things a bad movie can get. And people were disappointed by AoU, but that's because it came after a stellar 2014 (Guardians & Winter Soldier) with super-high expectations. Yeah, Marvel could have done better, but it was still a solid movie.

And again, I was one of the people who were hoping that Fox could pull through & make a good movie with the F4 reboot. I guess I just didn't see the writing on the wall.
 
You would think people would be upset with disappointing movies but not with Marvel movies. This is why it's petty. Marvel movies, by their fandom, get a pass (just like any other fandom) so when you hear remarks regarding giving it back to Marvel it comes off as petty.



Marvel has made 2 Thor movies and they were bad. Can Marvel give away the rights away already? This logic only goes one way: straight to Marvel.

I like the Thor movies....they aren't bad, maybe just okay, but not bad.
 
Give the rights back to Marvel? Boring.

I've got a better idea: just give all the superhero movies to Ang Lee. That would be fun and worth watching.
 
Keep in mind that I was hoping that Fox could pull through. This movie is proof that Fox doesn't know how to make a good Fantastic Four movie.

Given Marvel's track record for villains I dont think you would see any improvement in Doom's portrayal at least if the rights were to shift.
 
You would think people would be upset with disappointing movies but not with Marvel movies. This is why it's petty. Marvel movies, by their fandom, get a pass (just like any other fandom) so when you hear remarks regarding giving it back to Marvel it comes off as petty.



Marvel has made 2 Thor movies and they were bad. Can Marvel give away the rights away already? This logic only goes one way: straight to Marvel.
The Thor movies are not bad though. Neither is Age of Ultron.
 
Which is weird reasoning since they have more than just those two movies. Thor 1, 2, Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2, 3, Captain America: The First Avenger, Age of Ultron.

Can Marvel give away these rights? They're clearly not competent films.

Hey look, somebody who can't tell the difference between "mediocre" or "bad".

RT Scores:

Thor: 77%
Thor 2: 66%
Iron Man 2: 72%
Iron Man 3: 79%
Captain America: 79%
Age of Ultron: 74%

Fantastic Four: 20%

Here we learn the difference between what you like and what a lot of people are saying about a film you haven't seen yet. Consensus bro.
 
Well, it is their material. Not sure what you're trying to say here.

That the rights go one way and no one is critical of Marvel movies to the point where they want the rights given to someone else. I understand Marvel owns the rights, but it's petty to want the rights given back if the movie is bad considering Marvel does have bad movies.
 
That the rights go one way and no one is critical of Marvel movies to the point where they want the rights given to someone else. I understand Marvel owns the rights, but it's petty to want the rights given back if the movie is bad considering Marvel does have bad movies.
Then you & I have very different definitions of bad. Allow me to use a fellow GAFer's post as proof of my point.
Hey look, somebody who can't tell the difference between "mediocre" or "bad".

RT Scores:

Thor: 77%
Thor 2: 66%
Iron Man 2: 72%
Iron Man 3: 79%
Captain America: 79%
Age of Ultron: 74%

Fantastic Four: 20%

Here we learn the difference between what you like and what a lot of people are saying about a film you haven't seen yet. Consensus bro.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom