Fit chicks vs. Average Joes. Who'll win?

I can't be the only person who misread the title as "fat chicks", right?
 
Spoiler
wLNV3oO.png
 
And these chicks have mass, a far cry from the usual Hollywood casting. And they still get trounced. Give them all 40 pound rucks, a disassembled mortar and radio to carry, and 3 days marching through the mountains, lets see who wins :P
 
Not really surprised. Guys are naturally stronger, bigger, weigh more, and when it comes to psycho power they definitely would go Rambo crazy more than the avg female. And even compared against fit chicks who work out, the women really need to be abnormally or exceptionally in shape to beat an avg dude.

That one guy in the green shirt didnt look that avg. He looked pretty fit. The other two guys were much more avg.
 
Last edited:
winjer said:
Some people really don't understand just how big the difference is between men and women, in terms of physicality.
Even kids are faster and stronger than full grown female athletes. A recent example...


www.outkick.com

Switzerland Women's National Soccer Team Got Smoked By U15 Boys Team

As part of their preparation for the upcoming Women's Euro 2025 tournament, Switzerland's National Team lost to the Luzern's U15 boys' team in a friendly match, 7-1.
www.outkick.com www.outkick.com

Click to expand...

Never mind evenly aged men and women competing. High school kids and half drunk tennis players can beat top teams too. It's not a fair competition unless the women are really jacked up pros against total slobby guys. Or it gets to a point if the mens team is young enough, they just cant compete against adult women. Guys are just bigger, stronger and more skilled.

This goes back a bit, but there was a time the Canadian Women's Hockey Team played in a mens league. They were one of the worst teams in the league. I remember seeing the standings and they were something like 6-23. I forget when it was and what league that was. Pretty sure it was a league out west.

And there's articles there was some kind of exhibition hockey game against high schoolers (I forget if it was Canada or US womens team). The mens team couldnt hit and they had to play shorthanded ALL GAME. So the womens team effectively had a PP the whole game. I know for sure the women didnt win. I'm pretty sure it went to OT and it was either a 3-3 draw or guys won 4-3.

en.wikipedia.org

Karsten Braasch - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

 
Last edited:
winjer said:
Some people really don't understand just how big the difference is between men and women, in terms of physicality.
Even kids are faster and stronger than full grown female athletes. A recent example...


www.outkick.com

Switzerland Women's National Soccer Team Got Smoked By U15 Boys Team

As part of their preparation for the upcoming Women's Euro 2025 tournament, Switzerland's National Team lost to the Luzern's U15 boys' team in a friendly match, 7-1.
www.outkick.com www.outkick.com

Click to expand...

I wonder how many personal fouls those boys had against those ladies :P

It's only in recent years when people just never go out and see anything with their own eyes that this odd narrative of "women are just as physically capable as men if they had equal training" took root. It's blatantly obvious on the field in ANY sport once the kids hit puberty. I agree that this physical superiority shouldn't be assumed to reflect intellectual superiority of men over women as that is clearly and demonstrably false. Though in a competitive environment there does seem to be a bias for men, perhaps due to aggression and focus devoted to the game that females in general can not match (Chess, Go, shogi, though things like spelling bees are more balanced) for various reasons, some biological but likely largely cultural. But when you get to physical sports that aren't necessarily strength/endurance based, like darts for example, we still see men dominating. Is it because of culture dissuading women from even playing? Or are there still neurological differences for men that give them an edge? Even something like croquet, which seems like it would be a gender neutral sport, has a disparity. You have to range far into things like sewing competitions to find a deep female bench, here I suspect it is the cultural aspect at play (like it may be for darts) where men simply don't even try, rather than men have some inferiority in sewing.
 
If someone looks like they have awesome muscles they have probably dehydrated themselves and are generally feeling like shit. If someone does a lot of sport they might also have a laundry list of recurring injuries or even brain damage. You really can't judge a book by its cover.
 
Look at any sport where they have objective, time or distance based measurements and look at the records. Boys start exceeding the women's world records around the age of 15 or so. A good 17 year old high school kid is better at track and field than the greatest woman olympian ever. But then guys have another 5-10 years to reach their physical peak.

The gulf is totally enormous but we need to pretend it doesn't exist.
 
Last edited:
jason10mm said:
I wonder how many personal fouls those boys had against those ladies :P

It's only in recent years when people just never go out and see anything with their own eyes that this odd narrative of "women are just as physically capable as men if they had equal training" took root. It's blatantly obvious on the field in ANY sport once the kids hit puberty. I agree that this physical superiority shouldn't be assumed to reflect intellectual superiority of men over women as that is clearly and demonstrably false. Though in a competitive environment there does seem to be a bias for men, perhaps due to aggression and focus devoted to the game that females in general can not match (Chess, Go, shogi, though things like spelling bees are more balanced) for various reasons, some biological but likely largely cultural. But when you get to physical sports that aren't necessarily strength/endurance based, like darts for example, we still see men dominating. Is it because of culture dissuading women from even playing? Or are there still neurological differences for men that give them an edge? Even something like croquet, which seems like it would be a gender neutral sport, has a disparity. You have to range far into things like sewing competitions to find a deep female bench, here I suspect it is the cultural aspect at play (like it may be for darts) where men simply don't even try, rather than men have some inferiority in sewing.
Click to expand...
For sure.

Only way women win in a physical sport is if they are truly leagues beyond some old or fat guys who can barely move. But assuming the mens team are avg guys with some avg height, weight and agility, those natural advantages over women will clearly show unless the womens team are amped up Olympians or something.

Everyone can already see this in any mens or womens league where it can be spliced into age groups or weight classes because it's obviously pretty stupid for college kids to play against 13 year olds, or a 220 lb heavyweight wrestling a 140 lb guy. And these dumb prohibited contests are already in the same sex class.

So men and women competing in the same sport is really the same thing. Just more of a freak show. It's just that people are trying to balance off training and skill for women assuming it can counter beer dudes 80 lb advantage, raw power boost and 6 inches height advantages. Men will also have bigger hands so any sport requiring gripping something will be easier for them too. So it's no surprise guys will win even if they arent trained.
 
Last edited:
Just comes down to raw stats. Women are biologically specced for:

- White Mage
- Black Mage
- Summoner
- Archer/Bard
- Dancer
- Necromancer

They can still play other jobs but theres lots of peer reviewed studies that show how sub-optimal it is.
 
winjer said:
Some people really don't understand just how big the difference is between men and women, in terms of physicality.
Even kids are faster and stronger than full grown female athletes. A recent example...


www.outkick.com

Switzerland Women's National Soccer Team Got Smoked By U15 Boys Team

As part of their preparation for the upcoming Women's Euro 2025 tournament, Switzerland's National Team lost to the Luzern's U15 boys' team in a friendly match, 7-1.
www.outkick.com www.outkick.com

Click to expand...

Yeah but remember the time Bobby riggs lost to Billie jean king?
Proved women are better athletes than men period.
And don't give me any crap about riggs beating Margaret court earlier or a 55 years vs 28 years, or doubles court vs singles, or riggs refusing to take off that stupid jacket,
Women are better athletes and nothing can prove otherwise
 
Sub_Level said:
Just comes down to raw stats. Women are biologically specced for:

- White Mage
- Black Mage
- Summoner
- Archer/Bard
- Dancer
- Necromancer

They can still play other jobs but theres lots of peer reviewed studies that show how sub-optimal it is.
Click to expand...
I would like to add that women have made great strides in the field of Druid, Rogue, and Cleric (specializing in fertility). They also have a proclivity for summoning/communing with demons that make them natural Warlocks :P
 
Most of these ladies look like they probably been shooting up roids and testosterone as well.
 
Last edited:
And it only wasn't a sounding 4x0 because the fat guy screwed on the deadlift against a crossfiter.
 
Last edited:
StreetsofBeige said:
This goes back a bit, but there was a time the Canadian Women's Hockey Team played in a mens league. They were one of the worst teams in the league. I remember seeing the standings and they were something like 6-23. I forget when it was and what league that was. Pretty sure it was a league out west.

And there's articles there was some kind of exhibition hockey game against high schoolers (I forget if it was Canada or US womens team). The mens team couldnt hit and they had to play shorthanded ALL GAME. So the womens team effectively had a PP the whole game. I know for sure the women didnt win. I'm pretty sure it went to OT and it was either a 3-3 draw or guys won 4-3.
Click to expand...

That reminds me of Mike Tyson's fight last year. I wonder if there's a name for that weird feeling of, "what an awkward, expected let down" + "why were so many people expecting something more epic than this" + "in my real timeline, everyone would've thought this was stupid"
 
jason10mm said:
I wonder how many personal fouls those boys had against those ladies :P

It's only in recent years when people just never go out and see anything with their own eyes that this odd narrative of "women are just as physically capable as men if they had equal training" took root. It's blatantly obvious on the field in ANY sport once the kids hit puberty. I agree that this physical superiority shouldn't be assumed to reflect intellectual superiority of men over women as that is clearly and demonstrably false. Though in a competitive environment there does seem to be a bias for men, perhaps due to aggression and focus devoted to the game that females in general can not match (Chess, Go, shogi, though things like spelling bees are more balanced) for various reasons, some biological but likely largely cultural. But when you get to physical sports that aren't necessarily strength/endurance based, like darts for example, we still see men dominating. Is it because of culture dissuading women from even playing? Or are there still neurological differences for men that give them an edge? Even something like croquet, which seems like it would be a gender neutral sport, has a disparity. You have to range far into things like sewing competitions to find a deep female bench, here I suspect it is the cultural aspect at play (like it may be for darts) where men simply don't even try, rather than men have some inferiority in sewing.
Click to expand...

I think a lot of it, particularly for non-physical activities, comes down to competiveness and resilience.

Males just tend to have a greater propensity for competition and are willing to put up with a lot of hardship. Females are more geared towards social acceptance and conviviality (on the surface).

Take cooking for example. For almost all of it, physical strength doesn't matter. It's about skill and a good gut feeling for it. And despite pushes for more females, the field is still dominated by men.

Why? Perhaps it's because the culinary world is a high-octane place, where the pressure can be immense, stakes high, and tempers fray. A certain type of humour comes from this, and from the outside it comes across as nasty. Being competitive helps you survive this. I don't think most women are psychologically (due to biology) equipped for it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Poll
100 Men vs. 1 Gorilla. Who would win?
2 3 4 5
213
3K
sono replied
  • Poll
Bath vs. Shower
2 3
105
4K
basement dweller replied
  • Poll
iPhone 16 vs Google Pixel 9
2
60
1K
Grechy34 replied
  • Poll
Buffy the Vampire Slayer vs Supernatural
2
64
1K
nightfly replied
Unlyftable rapper suing Lyft because she wouldn't fit in the car
2 3
131
8K
Stitch replied
Top Bottom