1. Chelsea. They will loose to City but they made smart signings and Mou is a master at picking wins against smaller teams.and that eventually will save Chelsea.
Wenger won't budge until he is able to get the player he wants. He has always been this way and even though we are currently in a good position he isn't going to let that sway him.
At this point I have accepted this is the way it will be until Wenger retires.
And it could end with Wenger having a longer trophyless streak than Moyes was Everton manager.Wenger won't budge until he is able to get the player he wants. He has always been this way and even though we are currently in a good position he isn't going to let that sway him.
At this point I have accepted this is the way it will be until Wenger retires.
People keep saying City's away form is duff but they haven't lost in all competitions for 20 games now.
Also guys. Give me a sexy song to play in the background tomorrow while I'm in a thong and downing a dirty pint.
If Chelsea loses to City it's over.
Who have City played away from home in the past 20 games?People keep saying City's away form is duff but they haven't lost in all competitions for 20 games now.
Also guys. Give me a sexy song to play in the background tomorrow while I'm in a thong and downing a dirty pint.
A minor blimp. City's away form is gonna be crucial.
Not it's not weird.pls
It's Laurel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thea >>>> the mother >>>>>> the dudes
I want to kiss her eyes
is that weird
But I don't think he even has an idea of what striker he wants to buy otherwise surely we would have put a bid in for them now, we've had three transfer windows and we've had the money.
We went for Villa last January and didn't sign him in the summer because we wanted Higuain, we stopped trying to sign him when we thought we could get Suarez and after that we went after Ba because we were running out of time and there was no one else. We've had three months since the last transfer window to identify a striker that could improve the team and start negotiations, to come away with nothing just simply isn't good enough.
I love Wenger and I want him to stay but for the love of god he needs to wake up and realise our current crop of strikers are the worst he has ever had while managing the club.
Who have City played away from home in the past 20 games?
If Chelsea loses to City it's over.
Diego Costa is gonna solve all our problems next year.
Loyal guy. Lazio is shit and we're ahead of Milan this season (for now). Milan only wanted him on loan anyway and there's no way we're selling him less we have a proper replacement for him. He's been with us for a while now, is well integrated in the team and he is good. If we sell him it should:Biabiany refused Lazio and Milan. Dude is high.
Seun don't worry about Molinaro, he's the least of your problems.
Not it's not weird.
But she looks way too classy and normal. I like them slutty like Thea.
Thats a pretty low bar.It's not just us though. Chelsea couldn't find one either. They just aren't out there. He isn't going to buy unless they are better than Giroud.
It changes every window. Who knows who will be available in the summer. You have to be ready for anyone and sometimes it's worth taking a gamble and waiting till the end of the window. Imagine if we hadn't waited and instead of Ozil we got Cabaye.
Thats a pretty low bar.
http://www.liverpoolfc.com/news/latest-news/154441-boss-my-confidence-in-current-squad
Would 'ye look at that. A full interview already about the lack of new signings and how we didn't need them anyway.
@CardiffCityFC 5m
City confirm departure of striker Andreas Cornelius who returns to FC Copenhagen for an undisclosed fee. #DeadlineDay pic.twitter.com/fp9COxa735
Woodens boner just poked jesus in the face
http://www.liverpoolfc.com/news/latest-news/154441-boss-my-confidence-in-current-squad
Would 'ye look at that. A full interview already about the lack of new signings and how we didn't need them anyway.
People keep saying City's away form is duff but they haven't lost in all competitions for 20 games now.
Also guys. Give me a sexy song to play in the background tomorrow while I'm in a thong and downing a dirty pint.
We may get Benzema next summer when Madrid bring in their mega man.It's not just us though. Chelsea couldn't find one either. They just aren't out there. He isn't going to buy unless they are better than Giroud.
It changes every window. Who knows who will be available in the summer. You have to be ready for anyone and sometimes it's worth taking a gamble and waiting till the end of the window. Imagine if we hadn't waited and instead of Ozil we got Cabaye.
I'll put it on the list
3-2 at WBA
1-1 at Saints
3-2 at Bayern
3-1 at Leicester
4-2 at Fulham
3-2 at Swansea
2-0 at Newcastle
3-0 at West Ham
5-1 at Spurs
We may get Benzema next summer when Madrid bring in their mega man.
Mou the grinder will keep picking up points.
Why?
My Transfer Window Of The Year award goes to Fulham. Mullersten is going to keep them up for sure now.
Seriously? Giroud and Benzema? Have you taken a look at the French NT? They both are equally bad.I'd be happy with that.
He's an improvement over our current players but that's not saying much. What's good about him is that he isn't a scorer only; he assists as well.I'd be happy with that.
Why do people keep repeating this? He dropped points at home 2 days ago.
Giroud is a better finisher but Benz is much faster and more versatile in front of goal....and what I said above as well.Seriously? Giroud and Benzema? Have you taken the look at the French NT? They both are equally bad.
He could be part of the solution, but still need the big physical threat... So Lukaku will need to stay or another player of his type brought in. I don't get the rumors of Lukaku leaving, if there's any truth to it, it must be because of a falling out with Mou, which wouldn't surprise me that much with how much shit Lukaku is talking.
Because they've been poor in addressing that problem themselves. You're in bad company. Not a particularly good excuse.
Seriously? Giroud and Benzema? Have you taken a look at the French NT? They both are equally bad.
I'd be happy with that.
Why do people keep repeating this? He dropped points at home 2 days ago.
When a team plays with 11 men behind the ball its tough to score. Most of the teams are gonna struggle scoring against those tactics.
And you think it is more to do with negligence or incompetency than with availability?
They quickly addressed the other areas they were lacking in.
People keep saying City's away form is duff but they haven't lost in all competitions for 20 games now.
Also guys. Give me a sexy song to play in the background tomorrow while I'm in a thong and downing a dirty pint.
I absolutely think it's negligence.
They have all that money, which as you say they've spent, and yet they still don't have a top striker. They should have sorted it by now.
I don't quite understand your argument - that there aren't good strikers out there?
And that's how most teams are going to set up against them. So if he can't do it against West Ham why do you think he is going to grind out results and keep picking up the points?
Dont think many teams will set up exactly like that...with 9 players inside their own box. Only Allardyce can make his team do that.
Hardly any tough games. They have to play pool, arse and us away now. There is a good chance they will drop points there and Mou the grinder will keep picking up points.
And you think it is more to do with negligence or incompetency, rather than with availability?
With all these permanent deals I am curious to know whether there is any buy back clauses in their contracts. I mean why would you spend years developing youngsters and then just flog half the team in one window.Cole is a perm deal.
Rene pls. .
We sold RVP in the summer of 2012 and still haven't brought anyone to replace him I would definitely say that falls under negligence or incompetency.
It's obvious Mourhino wants a striker. He talks about it constantly.
What strikers are available right now that are better than Giroud?