LabouredSubterfuge
Member
I understand why the comparisons are made seeing as Dalglish took over from Hodgson but not only does this get posted quite a lot here on FootyGaf (how strange..) it's a pointless comparison because the reason Roy was disliked goes deeper than points gained and goals scored.
Hodgson had us in the bottom half of the table and playing a dire brand of football with the likes of Daniel Agger and Lucas on the verge of being shipped out for low fees because they were not rated by Roy (Poulsen and Konchesky were though). Then we had the multiple press conferences were Hodgson would make an absolute fool of himself and fail to back the players - Lot of people remember Hodgson being happy with a defeat at Goodison and that shit quite simply doesn't fly here in Merseyside. The tipping point came when we lost to Wolves at Anfield and looked genuinely clueless for 90% of the game.
Hodgson is a good manager for the smaller clubs (Insert joke about Liverpool being a mid table team here) and that's where he should of stayed. We all know Dalglish hasn't been the success we had hoped in the league but any one of us would take him over Hodgson every single day of the week.
We have Rafa to thank for that.
I realise your defence is much improved under Dalglish (possibly due to Clarke), but can you really say you're happy with the style of football you're playing going forward?
I know my opinion doesn't count because I support the enemy and thus I'm clearly trolling, but I find Liverpool hard to watch because they have a very direct brand of football at the moment. Little happening in open play bar a spark from Suarez. Are you happy for that style of play to continue?