How do you miss out Kagawa and the "next Xavi" Cleverly
Fergie and Gill were in London Yesterday, maybe to have talks.
How can you both forget the one man rock band? BEBE!
£50m Bebe avatar GO!
How do you miss out Kagawa and the "next Xavi" Cleverly
Fergie and Gill were in London Yesterday, maybe to have talks.
Aren't the international friendlies at a really bad time? August 15. Our first PL game is on the 18th...
fuck
Aren't the international friendlies at a really bad time? August 15. Our first PL game is on the 18th...
fuck
Now that Park left Evra for Fabio, Evra might improve his performance to prove himself to Park.
The power of love conquers all.
How do you miss out Kagawa and the "next Xavi" Cleverly
Fergie and Gill were in London Yesterday, maybe to have talks.
RVP to United makes perfect sense. Imagine RVP being surrounded by Valencia, Nani, Rooney and ClevGod?
I have to disagree. If he plays with Rooney then where does Kagawa play?
I have to disagree. If he plays with Rooney then where does Kagawa play?
United GAF know deep down inside that Kagawa is going to play next to Carrick in a two man midfield.
Had a 10 hour kip and I'm still livid with Daniel Taylor; my angry tweet to him last night was retweeted a few times in the interim too, it looks like many people are similarly irritated.
What a dick
Had a 10 hour kip and I'm still livid with Daniel Taylor; my angry tweet to him last night was retweeted a few times in the interim too, it looks like many people are similarly irritated.
@briankettle said:Here's the kind of snide demonisation that passes for journalism at a UK broadsheet when it's in the hands of a (cont)
If anyone wanted to know what the definition of an agenda is, they only have to read a few of Taylor's articles. He's the worst journalist I've seen in a long time, and considering the general level of journalism in this country, someone would have to work hard to stand out as markedly worse - Taylor manages it with ease.Had a 10 hour kip and I'm still livid with Daniel Taylor; my angry tweet to him last night was retweeted a few times in the interim too, it looks like many people are similarly irritated.
We play Gomel tonight, and guess what channel it's on? Fucking premiersports, whatever the hell that is. Costs £10 for a month, and you have to sign up for a minimum of two. So that's £20 to watch Rodgers first competitive match, fuck that. If I wasn't stranded in the middle of the countryside I'd go find a pub, but as it is I'll have to find a stroppy stream on a rural quality internet connection.
I'm with Bungie, RVP to United makes little sense, as does RVP to City (which unarguably makes even less sense). Juventus are the only destination that really need him enough to forego his slight negatives (injury record, age, inflated price relative to contract).
Florentino is the one who has to approve the signs. He's been fooled by Mou enough. Or do you think that Pardeza and José Ángel Sánchez have something to do?
And the fact is that Cazorla didn't reject us, he wanted to come, but Roig didn't want him to leave Villareal. He put Cazorla under big pressure.
I have to say this did give me a giggle earlier.
Have just been reading through the last few pages of the thread and I think what you said about him getting his position (chief football writer, really?) out of luck and knowing the right people is spot on. I've thought exactly the same myself every time I've read one of his pieces - the vast majority of them could be written by anyone with a reasonable grasp of football, except they'd almost certainly be better in that case as they likely wouldn't have the bitter agenda that permeates nearly every one of his articles.
Sachin Nakrani's another one who strikes me as fortunate to be in his position. Everything I've ever read from him has been either wildly inaccurate or just poorly presented.Sound like Daniel Taylor is in meltdown.
Almost as funny as the Sachin Nakrani vs MUFC fans episode...which also come about due to irresponsible reporting from a Guardian football writer.
Slants it as Suarez being against the crowd for booing him, when he wasn't, he was against the crowd booing during the Uruguay national anthem.I've read Daniel Taylor's piece and it's a nothing article. It's also seemingly factually accurate. What's the problem again?
He went to my high school!Sachin Nakrani's another one who strikes me as fortunate to be in his position. Everything I've ever read from him has been either wildly inaccurate or just poorly presented.
It's certainly not factually accurate. "Luis Suárez has angrily criticised the supporters who targeted him for sustained abuse" - he did no such thing. All he did was criticised the booing of the Uruguayan national anthem, which was disgraceful and he was fully justified to cricicise it.I've read Daniel Taylor's piece and it's a nothing article. It's also seemingly factually accurate. What's the problem again?
What's he saying? I can't see it as I've been blocked, you're not allowed to criticse him you see. I can just imagine him sitting at his computer reading his Twitter timeline, repeating "MY ARTICLES ARE PERFECT!" while hitting the block button over and over.Sound like Daniel Taylor is in meltdown.
Almost as funny as the Sachin Nakrani vs MUFC fans episode...which also come about due to irresponsible reporting from a Guardian football writer.
I've read Daniel Taylor's piece and it's a nothing article. It's also seemingly factually accurate. What's the problem again?
Retweeted that before, mentioned last night about analysing just why his piece was out of order, but Kettle's little outline did it perfectly. Ending bit was right too, hope the likes of Tony Evans make sure fleet street know exactly how poor he is.
It really is strange, he just doesn't have any exceptional qualities to qualify him in his position, at his age. I read a question and answer series with a Guardian football writer the other day, and he mentioned how favourably he looks upon Taylor's features, regarding them as something special, or noteworthy. Then I read a few of Taylor's features and was gobsmacked at how average, and unspectacular they were. This was meant to be the man's one redeeming skill and I was fairly certain I could've at the very least matched his output. Mystifying to say the least.
Sachin Nakrani's another one who strikes me as fortunate to be in his position. Everything I've ever read from him has been either wildly inaccurate or just poorly presented.
Slants it as Suarez being against the crowd for booing him, when he wasn't, he was against the crowd booing during the Uruguay national anthem.
PaulLFC said:It's certainly not factually accurate. "Luis Suárez has angrily criticised the supporters who targeted him for sustained abuse" - he did no such thing. All he did was criticised the booing of the Uruguayan national anthem, which was disgraceful and he was fully justified to cricicise it.
Fooled by Mou? Mourinho isn't fooling anyone here, he's repairing out club from within.
Enemigo en la contienda
Cuando pierde da la mano
Sin envidias ni rencores
Como buen y fiel hermano
Does DT have a repeated agenda against Liverpool, Liverpool players or Suarez?
Does Taylor support Utd? Lol
Does DT have a repeated agenda against Liverpool, Liverpool players or Suarez?
Why is he making a wider interpretation of it though, when it's perfectly clear in what context Suarez meant the comments? Every other journalist who's written about what he said seems to have grasped that he was talking about the national anthem and not the booing of him personally, Taylor is either unable to see that or unwilling to.I see, a wider interpretation of the context in which he said "a total lack of respect". Common sensationalist skew to fill some column space. Is this mild sensationalism really worth the ire? Does DT have a repeated agenda against Liverpool, Liverpool players or Suarez?
I see, a wider interpretation of the context in which he said "a total lack of respect". Common sensationalist skew to fill some column space. Is this mild sensationalism really worth the ire? Does DT have a repeated agenda against Liverpool, Liverpool players or Suarez?
But Suarez wasn't talking about the booing of himself. He was talking about the booing of the Uruguayan national anthem. That's what Taylor doesn't seem to get. Not once did Suarez mention the lack of respect being related to the fans booing him.I disagree. They may do what they will since he's a performer, an athlete and they've paid to watch him and his contemporaries compete. They didn't do it to intentionally disrespect Uruguay. He's made a rod for his back in the eyes of th English public, not just in relation to the Evra incident.
Mourinho is a great coach and I'm thank to him we have won La Liga again, but that man doesn't deserve to wear this badge in his chest.
Not that I can remember, and I like to think they sit around laughing about him when the recording light isn't on.Has Daniel Taylor ever been on Football Weekly? I don't remember hearing him.
Well guys, no more Internet during work for me for a few weeks. I'm training/ being trained in prep for my new position. I'll miss you.
Does Taylor support Utd? Lol
Nope. And he is, in tune with Arnie's apprehension of his total lack of footballing intelligence, fucking clueless about how we play.
Didn't see the problem with Red Issue's Klan masks.
But Suarez wasn't talking about the booing of himself. He was talking about the booing of the Uruguayan national anthem. That's what Taylor doesn't seem to get. Not once did he mention the lack of respect being related to the fans booing him.
Seems like United are his second team
he has written two books about Ferguson.
I really don't understand. They were booing Suarez when he had the ball - that is almost expected now, and he didn't once comment about that. They also booed when the Uruguayan national anthem was being played before the game - that is unacceptable and was what Suarez was commenting on.Well either Suarez misunderstood they were purely booing at him and not at the Uruguayan national anthem or he thinks that doing so automatically disrespects the anthem. Not sure I can support him on the latter.
How about we stop booing anthems.
Why is it okay to boo the national anthem?
Not really. On this very page there's clear, irrefutable evidence of his affection for United, so I don't know why you'd make such a bolshie statement.Daniel Taylor is not a Manchester United fan.
He hates Liverpool.
Which to Liverpool fans makes him a "manc".
Not during national anthems it isn't.How about we don't? Other teams being booed out of the stadium by the home fans is part of the game.
How about we stop booing anthems.
I really don't understand. They were booing Suarez when he had the ball - that is almost expected now, and he didn't once comment about that. They also booed when the Uruguayan national anthem was being played before the game - that is unacceptable and was what Suarez was commenting on.
I don't really know how I can make my thoughts clearer than that. Why is it okay to boo the national anthem?
I really don't understand. They were booing Suarez when he had the ball - that is almost expected now, and he didn't once comment about that. They also booed when the Uruguayan national anthem was being played before the game - that is unacceptable and was what Suarez was commenting on.
I don't really know how I can make my thoughts clearer than that. Why is it okay to boo the national anthem?
Arnie said:In fairness, they didn't boo the anthem, per se. They booed Suarez during the anthem, which is still equally unacceptable, and what Suarez objected to after the game. Don't blame LS for not understanding, perhaps he read the Guardian article.
I don't think he's a manc, I just think he's an idiot who lets personal agendas get in the way of being a proper journalist.Daniel Taylor is not a Manchester United fan.
He hates Liverpool.
Which to Liverpool fans makes him a "manc".