You won't elaborate because my statement is true. He did not play as well for about a 2 month stretch, that's undeniable, but just how poorly he played and his overall form for the entire season has gotten "worse" with each passing month. The reality is that even an injured David Silva is better than 99% of the other midfielders in the world but all of the sudden you're even going so far as to suggest Cazorla is better than him. It's pretty laughable.
Whatever. You can believe I'm being a revisionist but no, I thought he was very much in need of a rest and pretty dire from December to March.
The reality is that 99% of midfielders are worse than an injured David Silva? Oh man.
The Cazorla thing is opinion, there's not much in it. But he scores a little more, carried Malaga to fourth last year and is more versatile. I think Silva's fantastic but to argue that Cazorla is marginally better isn't out of the realm of possibility.
Not like calling Wonderwall the greatest song ever written or whatever you said. I kind of made a mental note to dismiss whatever you said from now on when you said that, so it's not surprising to see such aggressive arguing for a biased opinion on City. You've been doing it quite a lot the last few days. I assumed a lot of the banter the last few days has been tongue in cheek but you're very quick to come and defend something, so whatever. We'll agree to disagree.