PS3 FIFA GAF god knows where. Too many Torres-esque players. We need Quiche back.
PS3 FIFA GAF god knows where. Too many Torres-esque players. We need Quiche back.
That was Hixx too, he is a cunt.
I have no idea if you can see this!
That was Hixx too, he is a cunt.
I have no idea if you can see this!
HELL YEAAAAAAAAAAAH
Oh shit it was.
This is a brilliant vendetta.
When Avram Grant's Chelsea reached the final in Moscow in 2008, the professor realized that Ignacio's research might help Grant. He put the two men in touch. Ignacio then sent a report that made four points about Manchester United and penalties.
- Van der Sar tended to dive to the kicker's "natural side" more often than most keepers did. This meant that when facing a right-footed kicker, Van der Sar would usually dive to his own right, and when facing a left-footed kicker, to his own left.
- Ignacio emphasized in his report that the "vast majority of the penalties than Van der Sar stops are those kicked to a mid-height (say, between 1 and 1.5 metres), and hence that penalties against him should be kicked just on the ground or high up.
- Cristiano Ronaldo was another special case. Ignacio wrote int he report, "Ronaldo often stops in the run up to the ball. If he stops, he is likely (85%) to kick to the right-hand side of the goalkeeper." Ignacio added that Ronaldo seemed able to change his mind about where to put the ball at the very last instant. That meant it was crucial for the opposing keeper not move early. When a keeper moved early, Ronaldo always scored.
- The team that wins the toss before the shoot-out gets to choose whether to go first. Teams going first win 60 percent of the time.
...once you know the content of Ignacio's note, it's fascinating to study the shoot-out on Youtube. The Chelsea players seem to have followed his advice almost to the letter, except for poor Anelka.
...
At this point, Cristiano Ronaldo stepped up tot ake his kick for United. Watching on TV, Ignacio told his wife the precise advice he had given Chelsea in his report: Chelsea's keeper shouldn't move early, and if Cristiano paused in his run-up, he would most probably hit the ball to the keeper's right. Cristiano did indeed pause in his run-up.
To Ignacio's delight, Petr Cech stayed motionless - "not even blinking," in the Spanish football phrase. Then, when Cristiano Ronaldo duly shot the Cech's right as predicted, the keeper saved...
What's astonishing - though it seems to have passed unnoticed at the time - is what happened after that. Chelsea's next four penalty takers, Lampard, Cole, Terry, and Kalou, all hit the ball to Van der Sar's left, just as Ballack and Belletti had done. In other words, the first six Chelsea penalties went to the same corner.
[It then goes on to to talk about Ashley Cole partially disregarding the advice but since it was well struck managed to smash it in anyway]
Van der Sar had dived to his natural side four times out of six. He hadn't saved a single penalty. Five of Chelsea's six kicks had gone in, while Terry's, as the whole world knows, flew out off the post with Van der Sar in the wrong corner.
But after six kicks, Van der Sar, or someone else at Manchester United, figured out that Chelsea was pursuing a strategy. As Anelka prepared to take Chelsea's seventh penalty, the gangling keeper, standing on the goal line, extended his arms to either side of him. Then, in what must have been a chilling moment for Anelka, the Dutchman pointed with his left hand to the left corner. "That's where you're all putting it, isn't it?" he seemed to be saying. (This is where books fall short as a medium. We urge you to watch the shoot-out on Youtube.)
Now Anelka had a terrible dilemma. This was game theory in its rawest form. United had come pretty close to divining Chelsea's strategy: Ignacio had indeed advised right-footed kickers like Anelka to put the ball to Van der Sar's left side.
So Anelka knew that Van der Sar knew that Anelka knew that Van der Sar tended to dive right against right-footers. What was Anelka to do? He decided to avoid the left corner, where he had presumably planned to put the ball. Instead he kicked to Van der Sar's right. That might have been fine, except that he hit the ball at mid-height -- exactly the level that Ignacio had warned against. Perhaps Anelka was at sea because Van der Sar had pressured him to change his plans at the last moment. Van der Sar saved the shot. Alex Ferguson said afterward, "That wasn't an accident, his penalty save. We knew exactly where certain players were putting the ball." Anelka's decision to ignore Ignacio's advice probably cost Chelsea the Champions League.
[note: I left out the bit about Terry being an idiot so they're not attributing it all to Anelka haha]
Who cares? He will shit on us too if he came unless we matched his ambitions but from Suarez point of view the Liverpool situation is shit. That team is useless and even with Suarez won't make top 4 next season. Why waste the best years of his career away there?I'm not as convinced, Lightning. Madrid don't seem to give a fuck about him and are a gentleman's club.
Just remember if he transfers to us it'll be Arsenal that he'll be shitting on in two years
Hahahaha I don't think I was there for this
Who was it who did that?It was me and Quindarka alone, we won 6-0.
But here, we can have a highlight from when we were all there.
Yeah, it'll be pretty justified if we haven't shown any ambition if he comes here. Just please don't be racist/aggressive.Who cares? He will shit on us too if he came unless we matched his ambitions but from Suarez point of view the Liverpool situation is shit. That team is useless and even with Suarez won't make top 4 next season. Why waste the best years of his career away there?
The same reason why Cesc was justified to leave. We need to bring in Suarez but it can't end there, if it does we won't compete either and same result for us.
Who was it who did that?
It was me and Quindarka alone, we won 6-0.
But here, we can have a highlight from when we were all there.
Yeah I did. It was a great game, especially second half. Apkom, Gnarby and Eisfeld have excellent futures ahead of them. Especially impressed with Apkom.That's a wonderful read Shagwell. I love stuff like that.
Yeah, it'll be pretty justified if we haven't shown any ambition if he comes here. Just please don't be racist/aggressive.
Did you watch the game by the way? Some absolute screamers scored + the youth looking incredible. Seriously hyped for Apkom, Gnabry, Eisfeld, Olsson et all.
:lolHixx.
Richards ain't a tank no more.
C'mon man.
It happens once every two years. It shouldn't be once every two years. The ones that count are 2011, 2015, 2019, etc... The B team gold cup sucks.
Who cares? He will shit on us too if he came unless we matched his ambitions but from Suarez point of view the Liverpool situation is shit. That team is useless and even with Suarez won't make top 4 next season. Why waste the best years of his career away there?
The same reason why Cesc was justified to leave. We need to bring in Suarez but it can't end there, if it does we won't compete either and same result for us.
He acts like he misses. Wouldn't think he was under pressure at all.
Yeah I did. It was a great game, especially second half. Apkom, Gnarby and Eisfeld have excellent futures ahead of them. Especially impressed with Apkom.
Crowley is a great signing too. Love what I saw from him the other day.
Gab that to me mug m8 n not online n see wot comes about
Suarez doesn't give a fuck about your history or what you done under Benitez. He cares about today and at present you're shit.Liverpool have 5 CL titles. The last one was achieved after Arsenal won their last trophy, and that was almost a decade ago.
Liverpool won another two titles after that. If they are useless, I don't know what that makes of Arsenal.
So are Arsenal to be honest.Suarez doesn't give a fuck about your history or what you done under Benitez. He cares about today and at present you're shit.
What is the difference between today's Arsenal and Liverpool?Suarez doesn't give a fuck about your history or what you done under Benitez. He cares about today and at present you're shit.
That's a wonderful read Shagwell. I love stuff like that.
Yeah, it'll be pretty justified if we haven't shown any ambition if he comes here. Just please don't be racist/aggressive.
Did you watch the game by the way? Some absolute screamers scored + the youth looking incredible. Seriously hyped for Apkom, Gnabry, Eisfeld, Olsson et all.
HELL YEAAAAAAAAAAAH
That's a wonderful read Shagwell. I love stuff like that.
.
Does anyone know if Chops is still alive in dc's Xcom game? This is important information.
Then you should really read the whole book.
With the way he was playing most certainly dead.
Any of you lads read Soccernomics? Putting aside the shite title it's a really interesting book. Anyway, thought I'd share a little snippet since 'ol Wilbur laments the lack of football talk. It's still somewhat related to Man Utd, buttfuck it doe How Anelka fucked up the CL final of '08:
fuck
The state of Arsenal is not that relevant though. Suarez is not our player and we've lost players for that exact same reason though.What is the difference between today's Arsenal and Liverpool?
You get CL football, we don't. But for you, it just means another trophy that youll compete for with no chance of winning.
If it's anything like that quote, I'm down.There's a lot of really cool stuff in the book if you ever come across it. I'm still on my first go round but if there's any other cool shit like that snippet I'll try to post it.
It's on my list! I've heard good things.Then you should really read the whole book.
How the hell did he do that?
fuck
I have Soccernomics on my desk. Its a dull read.
Any of you lads read Soccernomics? Putting aside the shite title it's a really interesting book. Anyway, thought I'd share a little snippet since 'ol Wilbur laments the lack of football talk. It's still somewhat related to Man Utd, buttfuck it doe How Anelka fucked up the CL final of '08:
Different strokes and all that I suppose. To be fair I read it as a non-fiction book and not as some cohesive story, I pick and choose what interests me. I skipped the chapters on the why football clubs almost never go out of business and why football clubs aren't profitable. But chapters like 'Do coaches matter?', The Economist's Fear of the Penalty Kick', 'The Secret of Claude Makelele', and all that other economists take on actual football stuff is pretty interesting shit in my book.
Plowing through The Inbetweeners. Sadly on the last episode Netflix has available. Jay and his constant football shirts and shit talking means this is how I will envision all of you now.
Oh dude speaking of Emmanuelle Chiriqui yesterday she is totally smoking. I'm watching Entourage right now on HBO GO and it's some episode where her and E are trying anal for the first time hahaha. Her uncomfortable/slightly pained/mostly enjoying the booty banging face is awesome.wow that is incredible.
Woodward, you better sit your ass down with Adnans agent and get a new contract sorted. We can't lose him too.
Any of you lads read Soccernomics? Putting aside the shite title it's a really interesting book. Anyway, thought I'd share a little snippet since 'ol Wilbur laments the lack of football talk. It's still somewhat related to Man Utd, buttfuck it doe How Anelka fucked up the CL final of '08:
Oh dude speaking of Emmanuelle Chiriqui yesterday she is totally smoking. I'm watching Entourage right now on HBO GO and it's some episode where her and E are trying anal for the first time hahaha. Her uncomfortable/slightly pained/mostly enjoying the booty banging face is awesome.
Feed him well. He's a fan of steak.Dailyfail claiming that Zenit want Anderson.
Ugh.
She hasn't done anything of note in ages. Kinda weird.Counting the days until I can see that face live. She's single man, SINGLE.
Feed him well. He's a fan of steak.
Dat Pep-Bayern: