I think it's fucking weird that a game with an aggregate review rating of 70+ is considered 'not very good'.
Games industry is odd.
when Halo games and GTA IV got 10s, then a 7 is plain horrible
I think it's fucking weird that a game with an aggregate review rating of 70+ is considered 'not very good'.
Games industry is odd.
Apparently Lichsteiner's contract expires at the end of the season.
We should get him. Need a proper backup for Rafael.
I think it's fucking weird that a game with an aggregate review rating of 70+ is considered 'not very good'.
Games industry is odd.
I think it's fucking weird that a game with an aggregate review rating of 70+ is considered 'not very good'.
Games industry is odd.
Apparently Lichsteiner's contract expires at the end of the season.
We should get him. Need a proper backup for Rafael.
Apparently Lichsteiner's contract expires at the end of the season.
We should get him. Need a proper backup for Rafael.
Swagger up to 100... or 75 I suppose.
You need a full back actually better than the rat, not a 31 year old Lichtsteiner.
It's not weird, seeing as most of the reviewers use the 5 to 10 scale.
Don Vito once again outclassing all of the 'top' keepers.
when Halo games and GTA IV got 10s, then a 7 is plain horrible
That is weird.
Well it's weird that reviewers do that, not weird that people see the 7 as a bad score.
Well one's a byproduct of the other. But yeah, that was my original point.
I can understand where they're coming from; because films are passive, you can probably just sit there and watch an average one. It is harder to play an average game than watch an average movie (and costs more too).
Games should just be rented out of three or four or something m8.
1 = 0-5
2 = 6-7
3 = 8-9
4 = 10
put me in charge. I'll sort the wheat from the chaff.
I have my job interview in two hours. Nervous.
That is weird.
If Vito was so good he'd be playing for a top club m8
I agree. 1-5 like giantbomb works too.
Good luck with the job interview, what is it?
There are only 2 keepers on that list I'd swap him for.
Neither are playing in Manchester.
okay I see how it is..Apparently Lichsteiner's contract expires at the end of the season.
We should get him. Need a proper backup for Rafael.
Since Aguero joined City, Rooney has more goals and more assists.
Rooney is amazing.
Aguero is the biggest star in the league, though.
Yurt, if both are fit who do you think should start, Pirlo or Verratti?
Verratti
Legend
Since Aguero joined City, Rooney has more goals and more assists.
Rooney is amazing.
Aguero is the biggest star in the league, though.
Including or excluding penalties?
Pirlo.
I like Madonna, but he's not even close to Pirlo's class yet. He's a fucking maniac and might get sent off any minute too
Including or excluding penalties?
Di Matteo: I wanted to take a break from the game after Chelsea. Watched a lot of football and studied leadership and social media.
Mannone is so good he couldn't even get in ahead of Chesney.
Incredible.
*SPLAT*
Mannone only got picked at SAFC because Keiren Westwood died or something. It's all about taking the chance when you get it.
Would you say he got a fair pop at the Arsenal spot?
Jacuzi can't even get in ahead of Ashley Young or Valencia.
How inane, viva.
I'd say the only keepers clearly and plainly better than De Gea are Neuer and Buffon. There may be a few better (Courtois again springs to mind), but it's certainly closer and more contentious.
Courtois has been better than him lately - and he's also really young.
Buffon has started to make mistakes lately. De Gea has made like 2 in a season and a half. Great consistency.
Neuer obv by far the best.
I don't think it has to be taken into account but you have to remember those keepers are playing behind brilliant defensive units. Organised teams with experienced and commanding centre halves. Look at what De Gea has to put up with for fucks sake. Clowns falling over each other in front of him.
The X is better than Y discussions are always painful.
The X is better than Y discussions are always painful.
Courtois has been better than him lately - and he's also really young.
Buffon has started to make mistakes lately. De Gea has made like 2 in a season and a half. Great consistency.
Neuer obv by far the best.
I don't think it has to be taken into account but you have to remember those keepers are playing behind brilliant defensive units. Organised teams with experienced and commanding centre halves. Look at what De Gea has to put up with for fucks sake. Clowns falling over each other in front of him.
The X is better than Y discussions are always painful.
Say whatever you want about Mannone, I don't need my opinion validated by people whose knowledge of him extends as far as Match of the Day.
But saying De Gea is only bettered by Neuer and Buffon. I can't argue with minds as simple as this. It's not fair, it's like bullying the simple kid at school who stunk of shit and made up rhymes when he wiped his arse. And whose dad was a convicted arsonist and looked like a serial killer from the 70s. Looked a bit like David Earl's character in Derek if he had a bald patch.
In fact it is worse. You should be ashamed.
Buffon isn't even that good anymore.
I mean look at him
Mannone would never do that.