I don't buy this woe is me Chelsea have a thin squad stuff. They won the league at a canter and have spent £150million and felt they could get away with selling Matic and Costa.
They should be fine with that.
Still think Spurs will win though.
I never once heard this crock about "oh they can't win the league because they have Europe to contend with" until Liverpool nearly won the league in 2014. Before that, City, Arsenal, United, Chelsea never had a problem winning the league and also getting it up for Champions league games.
In fact, are Chelsea last year and Leicester not the only times to ever win the league whilst not being in the CL. Blackburn too, but special circumstances tbf.
Is Hazard available yet?
If not, then Chelsea will be stuck in the middle like in the previous fixture. Willian is kinda soulless these days and Pedro is inconsistent.
I don't buy this woe is me Chelsea have a thin squad stuff. They won the league at a canter and have spent £150million and felt they could get away with selling Matic and Costa.
They should be fine with that.
Still think Spurs will win though.
City would be ready to pay Messi's 300 million release clause. This would be nuts haha.
Laughing about an injury is very inappropriate...
...but I have to admit It's fcking hilarious.
We've sold a lot of first team players and not really replaced them, the squad is probably ok to compete in the league again but we are in 3 other competitions.
We sold Mikel, Oscar and Ivanovic in January, netting £60m plus whatever in wages but didn't replace them, Conte made very few changes in the league last season, we basically only used about 15 players.
The squad is short, we also have a net spend of £20m this summer so far which will go negative if the Costa deal i've seen touted is legit.
We have no backup left wing back, 3 central midfielders, and 4 central defenders (bare in mind we play 3 at the back) if we get a mild injury crisis we have a lot of issues. Club should be buying when we're selling so much
Well if you just take the defensive personell then yes we have some great names.That may be true, but you don't really believe that this is what your defense is capable of, do you? And "defense" was kinda unspecified as it is a word with broader meaning. I meant specifically your defense players.
Right now you have to implement Tolisso in your game - besides a couple of injuries and what not -, thus it's not really surprising that not everything is going well.
City would be ready to pay Messi's 300 million release clause. This would be nuts haha.
Pretty sure every club is ready to pay his releases clause.
This comes down to an issue our club structure I think and our absolute short-termism:
Why are we being linked with Ryan Bertrand when we have Rahman out on loan? (Not to mention Bertrand used to be a Chelsea player...)
Why are we being linked with Van Dijk when we just sold Ake?
Why are we being linked with Danny Sideways-Pass Drinkwater when we just sold Chalobah and loaned out RLC and Lewis Baker?
It's like we're constantly treading water with the squad which makes no sense whatsoever given the size and success of our football club.
I agree, it especially remains to be seen how well Boateng is going to do his work. That's why I don't believe that he will play more than Hummels.Well if you just take the defensive personell then yes we have some great names.
Problem is though, boateng has not playing well since 2015. he had some very bad injuries in that timeframe.
Hummels was great last season for us. Süle is just 21. martinez is a wild card. Plays 2 great games. Then gets injured for one month
But our defense is worse under ancelotti. Pep's and heynckes' were much superior even with a worse squad because of their tactics.
Heynckes had to work with dante lol
I really don't understand Chelsea loaning out their brightest young players (or seling them) when you are so short. Even Abraham looked like Swansea's best player v Man U.
I really don't understand Chelsea loaning out their brightest young players (or seling them) when you are so short. Even Abraham looked like Swansea's best player v Man U.
Abraham being on loan I don't mind so much - still a very young guy with a lot to learn - and, given we only play one up front, he's not going to get in ahead of Morata or Batshy.
You're right, though, especially in positions where we're weaker.
I don't resent guys like Ake, Chalobah and Solanke wanting to move on - it's good for the sake of their careers and I really do hope they do well - because it'll be a lesson to the board that selling these guys (for 20m, 5m and nothing) was a bad decision.
Chalobah is the absolute mindblowing one for me. We sell Matic and Mikel, bring in Bakayoko (who is injured) - immediately one player down in that position, and even though we've got MORE games this season we then sell Chalobah for peanuts.
Now we have Kante, a suspended Fabregas and an injured Bakayoko for the game vs Spurs...
Really can't wait for Solanke to score the winner against Chelsea. He looks a real talent.
Studge assist for the bonus points
Telling that de Jong can't get onto the bench in front of a winger who's made 4 appearances for us total.
Don't get why we gave him minutes in pre-season if we just want him gone.
Really can't wait for Solanke to score the winner against Chelsea. He looks a real talent.
https://www.lequipe.fr/Football/Actualites/Jean-michael-seri-prochaine-recrue-du-barca/827007
L'équipe saying Barcelona about to pay Seri's 40M clause
Yeah he does... EURGH
There's a great article floating around in this thread (or maybe the last) about Chelsea's youth policy in great detail from a fellow Chelsea fan. Super well researched, very in depth and very, very interesting.
And trust me - while the rest of the league/world mocks Chelsea's policy on loans and selling etc - NO ONE hates it more than the fans do. We would love to see Ake, Chalobah, Solanke, Christensen, RLC etc in the team.
Yeah the worst thing is that it's really successful. They have state of the art facilities and win bags of trophies at youth level.
Solanke just won the world cup and got player of the tournament. And by the time the tribunal is done, we'll probably owe like £3m.
He was invisible during the Napoli game midweek. Is he that good really?Bargain
He was invisible during the Napoli game midweek. Is he that good really?
Hope Chelsea perform a miracle later.
He was invisible during the Napoli game midweek. Is he that good really?
Hope Chelsea perform a miracle later.
If this thread isn't buzzing over Huddersfield vs Newcastle then moving to community really has killed it off.
Chalobah was funny as fuck yesterday, leaving that ball for Arter
Chalobah was funny as fuck yesterday, leaving that ball for Arter
Isn't that a foul? don't know what the rules say about verbal trickery
I'm not very bothered about Ake. The club already has better players for the position, and with both Christensen and Zouma, that have a way bigger potential that Ake, it's not a big loss. I just really hope Zouma can have a injury free season now, and come back strong.
Chalobah however makes me sad. He is a solid player in a position that Chelsea are weak as fuck in right now. At least there is supposedly a buy back clause, but I have my doubts if that will ever be used anyway. It makes sense if he really wanted out though, which you can understand. At the end of the day, the fault for that is on Conte for not showing him very much trust last season, and the blame for that, can also partly be pointed at the board for.