Deals for Fernandinho, the Brazil midfielder pictured, and Jesus Navas, the Spain winger, have already been agreed with Shakhtar Donetsk and Seville respectively and should be completed in the coming days. Isco, the Spain playmaker, could follow from Malaga shortly and Diego Novaretti, the Argentine defender who is out of contract at Deportivo Toluca in Mexico at the end of this month, is another firm target.
Perhaps only the pursuit of Edinson Cavani is likely to drag on, although that is understandable given the amount of interest in the Uruguay striker, Napolis desire to keep him and the small matters of that £52 million release clause and the huge salary he would command.
So far so good then for City, to the point where Roberto Mancini could be forgiven for boring the Indonesian maids at his sumptuous villa in Sardinia with tales of how differently things might have panned out for him at the Etihad Stadium had only the club adopted the same approach 12 months ago, a matter the Italian had not been afraid to complain publicly about.
Citys argument for not doing as Mancini wished was simple. Although aware that it was probably naive to expect they would be able to offload most or all of those players deemed surplus to requirements early in the summer, the risk of making a series of signings and then being left with a bloated squad that they could not trim was considered to be greater than the risk of losing out on key targets by waiting first to ship out the deadwood.
It was an unsatisfactory compromise for all, not least Mancini, and the consequences were evident last season as City finished 11 points behind Manchester United in the title race and crashed out of the Champions League group stage with no wins in six matches and the lowest points total by an English club since the competition was reformatted 21 years ago, even if the clubs hierarchy were right to have expected more from such a talented squad.
Still, the edict from Khaldoon al-Mubarak, the chairman, had been clear the club must sell before they can buy, and with no appetite to pick a fight with his ultimate boss, Mancini instead trained his sights on the messenger, Brian Marwood, who was the one to repeatedly deliver the bad news to the former manager.
Balancing the books took precedence, which, given the £97.9 million losses City would come to announce in December last year and the revelation that the wage bill had topped the £200 million mark, was something of a no-brainer, particularly bearing in mind the spending constraints being imposed by Uefas Financial Fair Play (FFP) rules, which come into effect from the 2014-15 season but the monitoring periods for which are already under way.
City, came the message, had to think long-term. They wanted to build a squad that could grow together over time, and running parallel to that create a development system, supported by their impending move to a new 80-acre training complex, that produces talent capable of breaking into a team with ambitions to win the Premier League title and Champions League every season. Sustainability was and is the buzz-word.
Al-Mubarak has banged about it repeatedly and even Ferran Soriano, the chief executive, addressing reporters in New York last month, referenced its importance regularly.
It is why Citys approach in the transfer market so far this summer makes little sense, beyond a short-term desperation to reclaim the title and improve on their dire record in the Champions League, and appears to constitute a deviation from the plan that was being formulated in the last few years to assemble a squad of players with resale value who would be in a position to offer long-term service.
They were wise not to move swiftly in the market this time, aware that last summers approach could not be repeated and no doubt emboldened by the knowledge that a lot of the players they plan to move on this summer are very saleable assets and will help to significantly reduce what promises to be a huge gross spend think Edin Dzeko, Joleon Lescott, Aleksandar Kolarov and, if it comes to it, Carlos Tevez.
But why City have targeted players in their late 20s, some of whom are demanding huge fees, when the squad is already brimming with experienced, established players and if anything needs a greater injection of players in their early 20s is hard to ascertain. Perhaps in the need to strengthen the clubs global brand the emphasis has to be on having a winning team next season, and with the pressure mounting and little time to waste, Soriano and Txiki Begiristain are going for a quick fix.
Fernandinho will be 29 and Navas 28 by the end of next season. Together they will cost around £50 million. The case of Fernandinho who could cost up to £34 million is particularly striking because many thought the days of City paying over the odds for a player in his late 20s were behind them. Novaretti would be a free agent but he too would be 29 by the end of next season.
Cavani who individually will cost more than many Premier League squads turns 27 next February. So far at least, only Isco, who is 21, appears to be the exception.
Of the 20 regular first-team players signed since the Abu Dhabi era started in 2008 who are still at the club, only two who can realistically expect to be there next season Yaya Toure and Gareth Barry were aged over 25 when they joined City. Tevez, Kolarov, James Milner, David Silva, Dzeko, Gael Clichy, Samir Nasri, Sergio Aguero, Matija Nastasic, Javi Garcia, Jack Rodwell and Scott Sinclair had a combined average age of under 23½ when they arrived.
Lescott and Kolo Toure both of whom will depart this summer were 27 and 28 respectively, although at least then City could genuinely argue that their outlook was much more short-term as they sought to build a team quickly that was capable of challenging for silverware.
The only other arrival aged over 25 has been Maicon, who was 31 when he joined City on transfer deadline day last August, but beyond bowing to Mancinis wish to bring in the Brazilian, there was little appetite elsewhere at the club for the transfer.
Moreover, by the time the season starts, City will have only two players under the age of 25 Nastasic and Rodwell; three if Isco signs who will believe they can force their way into Manuel Pellegrinis plans on a regular basis. Contrast that with their likely main two challengers for the title next season and Manchester United will have nine and even Chelsea who traditionally have always had a very mature squad will have six.
Micah Richards and Nasri turn 25 and 26 respectively this month, Aguero is 25 while Sinclair, 24, is unlikely to still be at the club.
The average age of the present recognised first team squad, excluding Fernandinho and Navas as well as Kolo Toure, who will shortly join Liverpool as a free agent, and Roque Santa Cruz and Wayne Bridge, who will also be out of contract, is just 26¾. Not old, of course, and well positioned age wise to reclaim the title they surrendered in meek fashion to United last term, but with so many senior players already to call upon, filling the squad with more older players represents anything but a long-term view.
There is also a debate to be had about whether the arrival of someone like Navas is more of a gamble than signing a younger British-based player given that he has spent his entire career at one club and has wrestled with chronic homesickness and anxiety issues in the past. Although he appears to have had those problems under control in recent years, no one can confidently argue that he will settle easily in Manchester when he has never before been asked to uproot and base himself far away from the family he has always had around him.
City may well win the title next season and that, of course, would provide the club with any vindication they need. But the talk about taking a consistent long-term view rings a little hollow at this moment in time.