Thoughts on race;
Baku is boring. All the drivers were really tentative so as to just finish the race. Outside of two long straights and a 1 stop pit strategy being employed, there was nothing to really bring the track to life. It looked like a Formula E race, except the F1 guys were lucky to have a DRS zone and straights long enough to use slipstream to overtake.
Valencia was a better track than this.
Nico Rosberg: domination, never even looked like anything but. Drove fast but smooth and it was never in question.
Perez: that Force India was really good here and Perez made the most of it. Drive of the day. If he hadn't had a 5 place penalty it would have been interesting to see where he would have been in relation to Vettel
Raikkonen: Did the Heinekken sponsorship wake him up or something? Apart from this typical Raikkonen moment of following Ricciardo toward the pit and getting a penalty, he actually seemed alive at the wheel today. Normally I picture him asleep in there, today he seemed to have some sort of urgency about him.
Can't really talk about Hamilton without talking about the whole 'instructions from the pits' debate. I don't really understand this one because it seems directly contradictory to issues in F1; wanting the drivers to be more responsible for how they drive and secondly safety.
On driving: I can understand orders like 'X is braking 5m later than you' or 'you can carry more speed through corner X' as that is driver coaching but is informing a driver how to rectify the cars software really aiding a driver? I understand people want this whole 'it should be the drivers out there doing everything, not the cars' but it's not the 90's anymore, the cars are loaded to the hilt with sensors, software and numerous configurations for a variety of different aspects of the car. They have teams of engineers to develop this shit, expecting the drivers to know the full ins and outs of the systems. Expecting drivers to troubleshoot, diagnose and rectify software problems on the fly just doesn't really cross me as a necessity, I'd rather the drivers focus on the actual driving (which is what everyone was screaming for in the first place). Obviously they have to have some idea of what's happening there because they are making all sorts of changes over a lap, but that the team can't tell them how to fix a problem or identify it, it just doesn't fit into the same category of a team coaching a driver on how to drive; it's more asking them to act as an engineer on top of the driving itself.
If the rule exists so we can see more driving actually driving and racing based on what they are capable of, it certainly didn't show it today. Instead of getting racing, you had a situation where a driver who was capable of actually racing being neutered and stuck in no mans land; fast enough to not be overtaken, not fast enough to overtake. It basically did the complete reverse of what spectators want to see; racing. Being head down looking at a screen flipping through settings isn't exactly racing.
Then the safety aspect. Doing 300km/h+, not looking at the track and instead playing IT support, I can't see how from the safety point of view, it doesn't come up as bit of an issue. For a sport where hundreds of a second can be the difference between going round a corner or ending up in a wall I would have thought the preference is for drivers to be able to focus on actually driving. No driver is NOT going to go rummaging through the settings if they think or know they can rectify the problem, something a driver could have fixed on a single straight if the team allowed them to took laps of a driver instead not looking at the road but focussing on that instead.
Hamilton is going to have to wear it for that track of course because the rules are the rules, but going forward I don't see how it benefits any driver to be in the dark about system software. I believe that is an area the technical crews should be able to advise on.